|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
|
|
 The Full CNN/YouTube DebatePosted on Jul 24, 2007
It was only a matter of time before the first ever CNN/YouTube debate found its way onto—where else?—YouTube. In case you missed it or just want to relive the Web-friendly fireworks, here it is for your embedded viewing pleasure. Click here for the official recap. Part 1: Part 2: Part 3: Advertisement Part 5: Part 6: Part 7: Part 8: Part 9: Part 10: Part 11: Part 12: Previous item: Freedom vs. Fear: Truthdig Podcast With Robert Higgs Next item: Olbermann on the Democratic Dust-Up New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
More Exposés, Less Action
Email 
Print
Share
Email to a friend
Newsletter 
Like Us
Follow Us
Get Our Feed
HOME|Digs|Reports|Arts & Culture|Uncovered|Ear to the Ground|A/V Booth|Cartoons
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
By carlito paquito, July 27, 2007 at 4:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
gotta hand it to the native american and kucinich! bar none that’s the ticket, and i’m not talking jon lovitz of which i co starred without the salary:(
Report thisBy Manila Ryce, July 26, 2007 at 7:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@Steve Hammons
A centrist party? The Democratic Party is simply a more moderate version of the Republican Party. They are both right-wing centrist parties already. Creating a centrist party between such similar ideologies will accomplish more bad than good. It will merely give the illusion of choice.
What people actually want is variety. Kucinich and Gravel are the only real liberals running. If we can convince them to run as independents, after the Dems choose their richest corporate sponsor for the presidency, you’ll have a third-party which stands for something.
Report thisBy Hammo, July 25, 2007 at 7:30 am Link to this comment
Although the Democratic candidates all did a fairly good job in the debate, and they are all reasonably adequate candidates, more choices might be a good idea.
It is unclear if Hillary, Obama, Edwards or any of the others could win in a general election, even under current circumstances. And, are any of them really appropriate for the job? Are the Dems going to blow it again? Possibly.
Where is retired Army general Wes Clark who ran last time as a Dem?
Many Americans seem to want a third-party choice ... not a left or right-leaning party and candidate, but a centrist and common sense candidate.
More on this in the article ...
“A much-needed new path for 2008: Time for independent and third-party candidates to emerge, transcend and unite?”
http://www.populistamerica.com/a_much_needed_new_path_for_2008
Report this