LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
January 8, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Navel-Gazing in the Grand Old Party

Why Do So Few Speak Up for Gaza?

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Israeli Voices for Peace

Gauging Obama’s Silence on Gaza

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Tragedy Repeats Itself

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
ENTER_ALT_TEXT

Visit to a Small Planet

by Gore Vidal
Fine, Collector's Copy $250 - SOLD OUT

more items

 
A/V Booth

The Full CNN/YouTube Debate

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jul 24, 2007
debate

It was only a matter of time before the first ever CNN/YouTube debate found its way onto—where else?—YouTube. In case you missed it or just want to relive the Web-friendly fireworks, here it is for your embedded viewing pleasure.


Click here for the official recap.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

Part 11:

Part 12:

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By carlito paquito, July 27, 2007 at 3:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

gotta hand it to the native american and kucinich! bar none that’s the ticket, and i’m not talking jon lovitz of which i co starred without the salary:(

Report this

By Manila Ryce, July 26, 2007 at 6:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

@Steve Hammons
A centrist party? The Democratic Party is simply a more moderate version of the Republican Party. They are both right-wing centrist parties already. Creating a centrist party between such similar ideologies will accomplish more bad than good. It will merely give the illusion of choice.

What people actually want is variety. Kucinich and Gravel are the only real liberals running. If we can convince them to run as independents, after the Dems choose their richest corporate sponsor for the presidency, you’ll have a third-party which stands for something.

Report this

By Hammo, July 25, 2007 at 6:30 am #

Although the Democratic candidates all did a fairly good job in the debate, and they are all reasonably adequate candidates, more choices might be a good idea.

It is unclear if Hillary, Obama, Edwards or any of the others could win in a general election, even under current circumstances. And, are any of them really appropriate for the job? Are the Dems going to blow it again? Possibly.

Where is retired Army general Wes Clark who ran last time as a Dem?

Many Americans seem to want a third-party choice ... not a left or right-leaning party and candidate, but a centrist and common sense candidate.

More on this in the article ...

“A much-needed new path for 2008: Time for independent and third-party candidates to emerge, transcend and unite?”

http://www.populistamerica.com/a_much_needed_new_pa th_for_2008

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Season's Greetings From Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.