Bob Woodward vs. Laura Bush

			December 6, 2009 Log in / Register
			Text Size

Troy Jollimore on Karen Armstrong’s 'The Case for God'

The Ratio

How the Anti-Semites of Hezbollah Have Sent Anne Frank Back Into Hiding

Why Obama's Strategy Won't Succeed

War and Peace

How the Anti-Semites of Hezbollah Have Sent Anne Frank Back Into Hiding
By Robert Fisk

Why Obama’s Strategy Won’t Succeed
By Eugene Robinson

Obama on His Own
By Dan Becker and James Gerstenzang

Obama’s Surge in Afghanistan Hardly a Surprise
By William Pfaff

Free Tuition for Harvard Law Suspended

Crunch Time for the Climate

Who Wants to Be a Big Brother?

U.N. to Investigate Climate E-Mail Controversy

A Chilean Icon Is Reburied

November Surprise: Job Loss Eases

‘Left, Right & Center’: Obama’s Undoing?; Tiger’s Foul Play

A California Climate Change Primer With Your Host, Gov. Schwarzenegger

Obama: ‘I’m Open to Every Demonstrably Good Idea’ About Job Market

Good Grief, Barack Obama!

The iPhone as Musical Instrument

Poe’s Poems Fetch Big Bucks at Auction

Troy Jollimore on Karen Armstrong’s ‘The Case for God’
By Troy Jollimore

‘Heat’ From Christian Law Firm, FCC Behind ABC’s Lambert Shut-Out

Financial Meltdown 101

A Dig compiled by the editors of Truthdig

Vetting Sarah Palin

A Dig compiled by the editors of Truthdig

Now They Tell Us: The American Press and Iraq

By Orville Schell, Michael Massing
$9.95

Bob Woodward vs. Laura Bush

Crooks and Liars

Bob Woodward defends his reporting on the White House against a Laura Bush smear, essentially calling the first lady’s honesty into question.

Watch it

Transcript from Crooks and Liars:

QUOTING LAURA BUSH: Andy Card also went on television and said that’s not true. And let me just say the one thing about that book: Those quote of mine, were in quotes, and the author didn’t call me and fact check. And it just didn’t happen.

KURTZ: Your response?

WOODWARD: Well, first of all, Andy Card, as you know, has gone on television and said the quotes are accurate. And that they did happen. And the first lady is saying that what she said and—again, there is a way, and a habit they have in the White House of you write something and then they kind of pick it up one step, then they deny the version that they say you wrote.

[...]Well, what I wrote in the book is that Laura Bush was concerned about Rumsfeld, and concerned that he might be hurting her husband. You only have to live in the United States of America to know that’s a possibility. It’s not surprising that she would have some concern.

I did not say and did not report in the book that she favored the ouster of Rumsfeld. The White House then takes that and says, the book says she favored the ouster of Rumsfeld. And then they deny that. It’s—but, you know—Card is not…

KURTZ: That’s something you say you didn’t report.

WOODWARD: That’s right. It’s not an unusual technique. But Card repeatedly has said publicly that the quotes are accurate.

KURTZ: Critics of the president, as you know, said that in their view you were too soft on the administration in your previous two books and now you’ve finally come around. And you were in a state of denial about administration incompetence.

WOODWARD: Well, they haven’t read the books, the first two books. The first book showed how Rumsfeld had no plan for the Afghan war. The second book, as I recall, “The New York Times” did two front page stories on “Plan of Attack,” saying that the book jolted the White House because it exposed the rift between Colin Powell and Cheney and other things. Certainly the White House is not going to embrace something that necessarily jolts the White House.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS: laura bush white house woodward

Related Entries

October 22, 2009 ‘Get Motivated’ With George W. Bush
April 2, 2009 Silence Meets Despair of Afghan Women
January 5, 2009 It’s ‘Laura’—‘Mrs. Bush’ if You’re Nasty
September 9, 2008 The RNC, CliffsNotes Edition
August 30, 2008 ‘W’ Teaser: Dubya Went A-Courtin’

Email to a friend

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: James Dobson Identifies Cause of Homosexuality

Next item: Stewart Debates 'Civil War' Semantics

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Mr.Tuttle, November 28, 2006 at 2:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Woodward is no longer a journalist, he is a book seller. When he feels the public wants to buy a book that favors Bush he writes that book. When he feels the tide change and now favors calling bush out as a fool and not fit for the job he writes that book.

Governments Lie.
Expose those lies and you are a journalist, go along with the lies and you are a coward and as much of a crook as the government you supposedly cover.

Woodward is a coward.

Report this

By AnnaCatherine, November 28, 2006 at 12:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Laura Bush has changed her story before. She first thought that singing the National Anthem in Spanish was a swell idea. She found out that George saw it differently. She instantly changed her opinion to English only. This happened on a news interview that lasted just a few minutes.My guess is that she is discouraged from thinking on her own much less talking about it. People who are controlled by others are not credible. I believe she was concerned about Rummy, but should have kept it to herself.The truth backed her into a corner. Too bad.

Report this