Crooks and Liars:
Peter King: Chris, I think the administration acted entirely appropriately. The 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case gives them, to me, the absolute right to do this. Theyre in full compliance with all statutes. To me, the real question here is the conduct of the New York Times by disclosing this in time of war, they have compromised Americas anti-terrorist policies. This is a very effective policy. They have compromised it.
This is the second time the New York Times has done this. And to me, no one elected the New York Times to do anything. And the New York Times is putting its own arrogant elitist left wing agenda before the interests of the American people, and Im calling on the Attorney General to begin a criminal investigation and prosecution of the New York Times its reporters, the editors who worked on this, and the publisher.
Were in a time of war, Chris, and what theyve done has violated the Espionage Act, the COMINT act. The time has come for the American people to realize, and the New York Times to realize, were at war and they cant be on their own deciding what to declassify, what to release. If Congress wants to work on this privately, thats one thing. But for them to, on their own, for the editor of the New York Times to say that he decides its in the national interest no one elected them to anything. Remember, this is the newspaper that brought us Jayson Blair. Going back a few years ago, theyre the ones who gave Fidel Castro his job in Cuba. They have no right to do this at all. The First Amendment is not absolute, especially when it comes to something like this, which is a clear violation of statutory law.”
Link
By Kilgore Trout, June 27, 2006 at 2:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
if some one hands me an envelope label “top secret” “classified” or whatever Im going to rip it open and see if theres anything good and if there is incriminating info Im going to shout it from the roof tops. Its not my duty to keep this information a secret. I never signed an confidentiality agreement. The only person who broke any laws is the person who leaked the information. If you dont want this information getting out then dont let it out, dont blame the media for your failures. Or much better yet if you dont want people to know about your illegal activities, STOP DOING ILLEGAL THINGS!!!
And of course the other part is if they are soooo concerned about leaked information why havent they fired rove/cheney and tried them for treason?
This is about trying to control the media through fear, nothing more.
Report thisBy R. A. Earl, June 26, 2006 at 11:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“The First Amendment is not absolute…”
Really? Who says? YOU? Who appointed you as interpreter of the First Amendment?
Damn I’m sick & tired of pompous, overpaid, arrogant, ignorant, RIGHT WING politicians who are in power, TEMPORARILY, only because they cheated and got away with it.
FYI, King, the NY Times has a hell of lot more credibility AND clout than you and the present Administration will ever have. Why don’t you just heed the old saying… Keep your mouth closed and you may be thought a fool; open it and REMOVE ALL DOUBT.
Report this