From the October 6 edition of Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor:
O’REILLY: Hi, I’m Bill O’Reilly. Thank you for watching us tonight. Some powerful forces want to influence your vote. That’s the subject of this evening’s “Talking Points Memo.”
While in Washington yesterday, I was able to talk with some very well-informed people, as well as read the latest dispatch from Stratfor.com, perhaps the best information website in the country. Now, this may surprise you, but the Iraq situation, the Foley scandal, and the Woodward book all have one thing in common: November’s election.
The war in Iraq has dramatically changed over the past year. No longer is the primary enemy there Al Qaeda and the Baathists. We are now fighting Iran.
Last summer, the Bush administration was close to a deal that would have brought some stability to Iraq. Shia and Sunni Muslims were close to accepting the new government. But Iran, which now arms and controls some Shia terrorist militias, decided that shouldn’t happen. And Iran’s killer mercenaries began murdering Sunnis in greater numbers. The deal then fell apart.
Now, Iran wants to keep the USA pinned down in Iraq so America cannot rally opposition against Tehran for their nuclear ambitions and other things. It also wants to weaken President Bush in the upcoming election. You remember Iran destroyed Jimmy Carter’s re-election chances in 1980 with the hostage fiasco.
So now Iran has ordered its killers to up the violence in Iraq for the next month, believing that Americans will hold President Bush responsible and vote in the Democrats, who the Iranians believe are not as aggressive in foreign policy.
[...]
O’REILLY: OK. So as long as Foley’s in the news, which is why the left wants him there 24-7, that hurts Republicans, no matter what happens?
MORRIS: Yes. And the only power a president has is to affect elections is not by campaigning—that doesn’t work—but by changing the subject. When Bill Clinton was perceived as being very weak going into ‘96, I encouraged him to bomb Bosnia. Now, he should have bombed Bosnia anyway, should’ve done it two years before, saved a quarter of a million lives. But it had the ancillary effect of making him appear strong, which was crucial in winning that ‘96 election.
O’REILLY: Interesting.
MORRIS: Bush needs to change the subject.
O’REILLY: He needs to do that.
[...]
O’REILLY: Because his father went on CNN, Bush the elder, and said that Woodward was full of hooey. Was that a smart move?
MORRIS: No. You can never win an argument like that. You can just change the subject. And what Bush is doing now is impotent. He’s going around the country talking about tax cuts and talking about the Patriot Act. It’s not campaigning that’s going to change this. What’s going to change it is using the power of the presidency to deal with real international issues and focusing opinion on it.
O’REILLY: All right.
MORRIS: It’s not wagging the dog, but it comes a little close.
Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery
Email 
Print
Share
Email to a friend
Newsletter 
Like Us
Follow Us
Get Our Feed
By Joe R., October 11, 2006 at 6:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Another fascist aggitator spouting off. Only the neo’s are listening now. Can’t believe he still has an audience. Bill is getting spooked because the Repubes may lose big. He may have to pay some taxes. Wish he would get outsourced.
Report thisBy LTJ, October 11, 2006 at 2:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
So, Iran tried to hurt Carter’s re-election chances in 1980? There is also very good evidence that this involved nothing less than TREASON by operatives of the Reagan campaign in their efforts to EXTEND the stay of the American hostages in Iran until AFTER the swearing-in of Reagan as president. And, as we know this is EXACTLY what happened (right down to the minute!). Reagan’s people are on record as saying that this was done to prevent a possible “October surprise” by the Carter campaign involving release of the American Embassy hostages from Iran.
And, we all know from the Iran-Contra hearings that Reagan’s people were certainly not above doing secret deals with the Iranians!!
Report thisBy Wil Morat, October 10, 2006 at 4:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m sure the biggest concerns of Iranians include helping Democrats…the conspiracy theories of the right are obscene.
Report thisBy Socrates, October 10, 2006 at 1:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Iran wants to keep the USA pinned down in Iraq so America cannot rally opposition against Tehran for their nuclear ambitions and other things. It also wants to weaken President Bush in the upcoming election.”
Don’t O’Reilly’s listeners find the glaring contradictions in this? Clearly, the best way for Iran to keep Iraq a total mess is to keep Bush in office.
But what’s worse is that he ignores Iran’s strong relationship with their new fellow Shia gov’t in Iraq. It seems vastly more likely that the Iraqi gov’t itself is running Shia militias along with Iran.
Report thisBy Ken Green, October 10, 2006 at 12:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Strafor.com huh. This is a private “intelligence” firm. Check out info on them at sourcewatch.org:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stratfor
Nothing like unbiased source eh O’Reilly.
Report this