Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 20, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates






American Catch


Truthdig Bazaar
Hugo!

Hugo!

By Bart Jones
$19.80

Empire of Illusion

Empire of Illusion

By Chris Hedges

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Christian Appy on ‘Mekong Diaries’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 16, 2009
book cover

By Christian G. Appy

(Page 3)

    There are important exceptions. In 1965, from Hanoi, Le Lam did some drawings of U.S.-supported torture based on reports from the South. One of them shows a woman lying on the ground, naked to the waist, with two snakes crawling out of her trousers and a third posed to strike her face, an image reminiscent of the torture inflicted by South Vietnamese soldiers on Le Ly Hayslip after she was caught spying for the Viet Cong (as described in her memoir, “When Heaven and Earth Change Places”).

    And artist Huynh Phuong Dong told Buchanan, “As an artist, I went to record the agony of the war. My drawings are history through painting.” His scarlet and orange watercolor, “Crossing the Saigon River Late at Night,” has a kind of lurid turbulence that powerfully signals impending violence without directly depicting it. The same might be said of Vo Dong Minh’s pastels of the Tet offensive. And perhaps one reason we don’t see more images of combat scenes is that they have been eagerly snapped up by private collectors. 

 

book cover

 

Mekong Diaries

 

By Sherry Buchanan

 

University Of Chicago Press, 264 pages

 

Buy the book

 

    Even so, virtually all of this art avoids death and suffering. Dong’s work doesn’t really evoke much “agony”—the goal he claimed—and even Le Lam seems to dismiss the significance of his torture sketches: “A photographer documents atrocities, the artist must portray life.” Still, the serenity of the art remains puzzling. “What calmness of mind,” Buchanan wonders, “allowed them to create stunning landscapes and elegant portraits as B-52s dropped their arsenals?”

    The question she poses circles back on itself, but perhaps extraordinary calmness is a key explanation of this art. As Quach Phong put it, “The soldiers liked to watch me draw. I was calm, it helped calm them down. They asked to have their portraits done in case they died. It made them feel part of history.” Pham Thanh Tam said something very similar: “They liked to have me around to watch me draw. It seemed to calm them, and make them feel special.” After a body of work was completed, the soldier-artists would have an exhibition. They would tie a clothesline between two trees and hang their work with clothespins. It doesn’t take too great a leap to imagine that an art exhibit in the middle of the jungle, in the midst of war, could have a powerful emotional effect.

    Though the artists do not say as much, it is also surely true that there were clear orders from political officers to keep this art as positive and inspiring as possible. These were, after all, artists with a political mission. That they produced great work in spite of constrictions on subject matter is a tribute to their skill and passion. And it is also probable that many, if not all of the artists, shared the official desire to accentuate the positive. As Buchanan suggests, the artists’ personal beliefs and artistic vision seem to have “coincided with official propaganda.”

    Regardless of why and how this art was produced, Buchanan was clearly drawn to it for the effect it might have on Americans. “If people could see these graceful images by the ‘savage’ Viet Cong,” she thought, “they would understand that war is a psychotic episode … not a policy choice to solve conflicts.” That’s dubious at best, I think, but it is certainly true that American culture has produced way too many cartoon images of the Vietnamese “enemy” as a ruthless and fanatical demon. As Gen. Westmoreland said, “The Oriental doesn’t put the same high price on life as does the Westerner. … Life is cheap in the Orient.” 

    And yet, does such an exclusive focus on Vietnamese serenity truly humanize them? My only concern is that it might invite us to an equally reductive conclusion: that the Vietnamese were, even in the midst of war, entirely noble and saintly. That is not unlike the image that surfaced in some quarters of the anti-war movement of the 1960s when valiant guerrilla revolutionaries were said to be so pure they “stole neither a needle nor a piece of thread from the people” (to use the Maoist expression). However disciplined and mentally serene, this was not a nonviolent revolution. Communist commanders ordered countless mass-wave attacks on U.S. and South Vietnamese bases, and their troops generally fought with extraordinary commitment. And, like soldiers in all wars, they could be utterly ruthless. One of them, a guerrilla fighter named Nguyen Thi Gung, was the only woman in her unit and one of its most celebrated members. She was given a decoration with the title “Valiant Destroyer of American Infantrymen.” She is not abashed about the killing she did: “I can’t imagine how many GIs I killed. After all, I detonated land mines and threw grenades, both of which could kill many men at a time.”

    My point is that we need to consider the possibility that the romantic wartime art was not merely an escape from war, but served the war. Perhaps more effectively than the cant-filled propaganda of political speeches and poster art, these works may well have connected deeply with a people who undeniably believed they were participating in a sacred cause linked to a long history of struggles for national independence and unification. Vietnamese culture has a powerful strain of romanticism that coincides with other “isms,” sometimes serving them, sometimes not. Ho Chi Minh himself deeply reflected that strain. Consider this short poem he wrote in 1948 called “Full Moon in January.” It was written in the midst of war against the French:

    Now comes the first full moon of the year

    Rivers rise in mists to join spring skies.

    We talk of strategy in high places.

    Yes, sell the compass, come on the boat of the full moon.

Perhaps Heinemann’s right: We lost because we didn’t understand that they were poets.   

Christian G. Appy, a professor of history at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, is the author of “Patriots: The Vietnam War Remembered From All Sides” (Penguin).

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Robert, January 21, 2009 at 6:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I read the book review posted on this site on Friday.  I immediately went out and bought the book at my local bookstore.  I finished the book within 2 days.  I was thoroughly impressed by the emotions that spilled out the pages by those who experienced this war.  The stories behind the painting/drawings were heartfelt.  It just shows that war is as psycological as it is physical.  It also goes to show the human toll war takes on everyone involved - as well as their family members. I will read this book again because it tells a story from a perspective that is usually ignored.

Report this

By xyzaffair, January 19, 2009 at 1:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I get really angry when I see the intransigence of Vietnamese refugees in the U.S. who violently protest the slightest acknowledgement of the current government in Vietnam.  Protesters in Orange County, CA, the largest Vietnamese community outside Vietnam, vandalized an art exhibit that displayed the red star flag and a repair shop whose owner displayed a portrait of Ho Chih Minh.  They claim such displays stir up painful memories.  What about those still in Vietnam who had family members killed by the mindless U.S. carpet bombings?  There are two sides to the issue, and these protesters should take the time to examine both.

Report this

By James E Taylor, January 18, 2009 at 11:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The art and science is a true indicator of
man humanity, much more so than teaching man to kill
one another.  One of the major problem in our schools,
are the lack of teaching the spiritual virtues to the
students.  Growing up in the thirties and forties we never had the kinds of problems you see from the schools today because, student not only respected their teachers, but each other also.  Each school day were open with all students and teachers beginning the day with devotions and songs.  How much more to have someone to recite a poem.

Report this

By since1492, January 18, 2009 at 5:55 am Link to this comment

We lost because we didn’t know anything about them, or their history, let alone their poetry and art work. We were given USO shows more for distraction than for inspiration.
Hoa binh

Report this

By JayRoot22, January 17, 2009 at 5:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fascinating piece giving further insight into the differences in approach to morale uplift and maintenance between the Viet Cong and their G.I. counterparts during the “American War” in Vietnam. It’s clear that Sherry Buchanan’s book will shed new light on the conflict and our huge gap in understanding our so-called “enemies” during that war. For that reason alone, “Mekong Diaries” would appear to be a valuable resource, but as fascinating as this piece is, I am a bit baffled by the “official” nomenclature that Christian Appy uses for the southern guerrillas usually known as “Viet Cong” (which, I believe is simply Vietnamese for “Vietnamese Communist”)as the People’s Liberation Armed Forces. I had always thought that they were officially known as the National Liberation Front for Vietnam. Or was that assumption incorrect all along?

Report this

By rav, January 16, 2009 at 9:48 am Link to this comment

A unique and real’ view. There is a beautiful ugliness to war, from this perspective. I havn’t persued this view of war and I think this article has sparked my need to look further as with your comment. Thank you

I will look to aquire the Mekong Diaries’ I think will be a good start.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, January 16, 2009 at 7:28 am Link to this comment


“How else to explain the will of millions of Vietnamese to fight for years?”

That’s normal territorial-trooping-primate behavior.  If the Vietnamese invaded the U.S., the Americans would have resisted for years.  In fact, the Vietnamese actually did fight smaller nations or tribes within their borders who didn’t care to be assimilated for years.  Humans are not very different from chimpanzees and baboons in this area.

Poetry may shore up the spirits of the warriors, but it doesn’t guarantee victory—the Japanese forces in World War 2 seem to have been fond of it.  Germans and Americans (the preponderance of whom descend from Germanic tribes) seem to prefer their verse with music.  Did “Lili Marlene” win the war, or lose it?

Report this

By rav, January 16, 2009 at 6:18 am Link to this comment

There is alway’s some new thing to learn about war and culture, this in particular is unique. Artistry and poetry grafted into the vietnamese soldiers fields of war for morall and balance. 
  I must say we Americans are a bit off the mark when it comes to morality and Balance in war.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.