Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 20, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates






American Catch


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Arts and Culture

Carla Kaplan on ‘The Mitfords’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 28, 2007
Mitfords cover

By Carla Kaplan

(Page 3)

The duchess’ very British love of American kitsch is one surprise—particularly in light of Nancy’s hatred of America and all things American (“that land of dire hypocrisy, where ... no birds sing, no flowers smell, no food tastes.”  But Deborah herself, or “Debo” as she is known to her sisters, is often surprising.  (She is also the volume’s undeclared favorite, and her generosity of spirit, aversion to conflict, and tendency to see politics and extremism as synonymous all find favor with the editor, who happens to be the daughter-in-law of the ideologically unrepentant Diana Mosley.)  While not known as a writer, Debo turns out to be almost as funny a correspondent as Nancy, Diana or Jessica, with an equally cunning eye (and ear) for telling detail.  For example, from the family’s island, Inch Kenneth, to Diana in Holloway Prison (where Diana was interned during World War II because of her pro-Fascist views), for example, Deborah writes: 

“Darling Honks

Muv [mother] says one can write to you at last, Oh I do so long to see your cell.  I haven’t seen you or your pigs [the sisters’ term for children] for such ages that I’ve almost forgotten what you look like what with one thing and another. ...

I can’t think of anything fascinating, nothing much occurs here.  Farve [father] is either in fits of gloom or terrific spirits, apparently for no reason.  I hope he won’t live here alone in the winter because gloom is usually the form & what it must be like here then I can’t imagine.  Lividry sets in when my goat eats his creepers etc exactly like it always did, he is an eccentric old fellow.

When we were climbing around the caves here the other day I heard the most terrifying sound just like a hermit tearing calico, it so horrified me that we haven’t been round there since.  It has become the stock joke & thing to be frightened of, oh the horror.”

The sisters’ small delights are often most endearing, such as their willingness, even as distinguished middle-aged women, to make ridiculous “Boudledidge” faces and be photographed doing so (Mosley includes two absolute gems, one of Deborah and Jessica at Chatsworth and a later photo-booth one of Jessica alone), their love of sounds and nicknames (each sister had a plethora), their fondness for animals (from chickens, dogs and sheep to stray owls, backyard hedgehogs and turtles, and the miniature horses which Nancy called “insects”), and their frequent self-awareness of the many ironies of their own class and national privilege— what Deborah calls “being a pariah.” 

They are most alarming, on the other hand, in their responses, or rather their relative non-responses, to what we would term the larger and more serious events of life: children’s deaths, husbands’ infidelities, Nazism, concentration camps and so on, things about which, here at least, they have remarkably little to say.  Unity’s impassioned descriptions of Hitler (which take up altogether too much space in the beginning of the book) read like those of a teeny-bopper, wild for one of the Beatles: “Such a terribly exciting thing happened yesterday.  I saw Hitler.  It was all so thrilling I can still hardly believe it.  If only Putzi had been there!”  And again: “The Führer was heavenly, in his best mood, & very gay.  There was a choice of two soups & he tossed a coin to see which one he would have, & he was so sweet doing it.  He asked after you [Diana], & I told him you were coming soon.  He talked a lot about Jews, which was lovely.”  One wonders if she ever understood what was at stake.  Diana, on the other hand, who clearly did understand, evinces a lifelong anti-Semitism, racism and denial of political realities—as late as 1975 she ranted about “Jews who are stopping him [Mosley] from getting a university appointment” and claimed that “most of the violence” involving British Fascists in the war came from “Jews attacking Kit’s people in dark lanes etc.”—which remains as hard to understand as her own confident claim to “hate unfairness,” or her sisters’ clear sense that, personally at least, that statement rang true.  This is a volume filled with such questions and contradictions.  Mosley lets them stand.  In 1996, after Jessica’s death, Deborah wrote: “Reading the obits. of Decca, the Mitford Girls are described, variously, as Famous Notorious Talented Glamorous Turbulent Unpredictable Celebrated Infamous Rebellious Colourful & Idiosyncratic.  So, take your choice.”  And at its best, this book encourages us to do just that. 

“The Mitfords” gets more compelling as it goes along and as the sisters, in the second half especially, become more and more complex (making the simplified tagging system that Mosley cleverly designed to identify each sister—swastika, hammer and sickle, and so on— seem increasingly problematic, ironically creating just the effect of “Nazis all the way,” for example, which Deborah feared in others’ simplifications of Unity).  Their stories of surviving the war to face the indignities of illness and death are especially moving.  It is hard not to be touched by seeing these indomitable and seemingly unstoppable women laid low by blindness, deafness, headaches, tumors and cancers, in part because they focus on the most concrete details of their own decline: “Darling Debo, Debo my hair.  Don’t laugh.  It’s ... a shaving brush,” Diana writes.  They struggle valiantly to keep up their trademark breezy, ironic understatement, and it is impossible, watching them do it, not to cheer them on.

  The sisters speculated that their letters could never be published while any of them were living.  “I also think a vol of letters will have to wait until everyone’s dead, don’t you, because of hurt feelings?” Diana wrote to Deborah.  But in bringing these letters to light now, the remaining Mitfords—the Duchess of Devonshire and Jessica Mitford’s two children, Constancia “Dinky” Romilly and Benjamin Truehaft, especially, all of them public people—have, to their great credit, replaced stock figures with complex and, hence, more three-dimensional women.  “It’s not too easy to know what anyone is really like,” Deborah wrote to Jessica.  But as she also wrote to Diana, “it’s the humanizing we’re after so Carry On Honks.”

Carla Kaplan is the Davis Distinguished Professor of American Literature at Northeastern University, a fellow at the W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University, and a Guggenheim fellow.  Her books include “Zora Neale Hurston: A Life in Letters” and the forthcoming “Miss Anne in Harlem: The White Women of the Black Renaissance.”  She is also writing a biography of Jessica Mitford.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By souljaEXVOTO, December 29, 2007 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I welcome this introduction to the Mitfords and do not begrudge anyone scanning this site the opportunity to click here or not click here; in this case a subject I’m a bit embarrassed for not having known more about sooner. And I think it’s very timely because for example, the recent Christmas family gathering: How many of us found ourselves sitting across the table from unapologetic oblivious Fox watching Republicans?  Did we talk or not talk politics? Did we wonder how it came to be that we share blood?

I applaud your choice of inclusion also for the timely reminder of the pace we expect nowadays, and the dying art of beautiful, thoughtful letters.

I just hate that big hunk of bloody red meat advertisement that always makes me skip quickly to the bottom of the page so my eye doesn’t wander back to that god awful image thus ruining an otherwise pleasant reading experience. (Even if it is about war and carnage). God lose that already!

Report this

By rangertommy, December 28, 2007 at 8:55 am Link to this comment

Sounds like an interesting book, but why is it the headliner for TruthDig?  Not seein’ the connection, folks.  Love your site otherwise, but I sure don’t visit it for this kind of stuff.

Report this

By Expat, December 28, 2007 at 4:39 am Link to this comment

I heard the original interview.  I wonder what it is doing here in Truthdig at this time in our existence.  Does truthdig want to become an English Literature or history site? 

I find levity as I need it in my everyday life.  I follow this site, somewhat dubiously at times, because of the issues, not because I want to know about a family, unless it is relevant to these critical times: Clearly, this is not relevant to anything concerning this most important time in American History.  WTF?

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.