|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
‘Lost Horizon’ for American OvariesPosted on Jul 28, 2011
(Page 2) The novel asks if we, the “first world,” should be spending billions to develop drugs that might let us have it all (whether that’s a baby in our 60s or, maybe, a life span of 100-plus) when that money could save the lives of millions of existing children in the developing world. In April, a British fertility clinic announced a new technique using liquid nitrogen that allows women to flash-freeze their eggs, a more viable method than the slower-freezing methods of the past. In the U.K.’s Daily Mail, the clinic director said that if women “freeze their eggs at the age of 30, then those eggs will stay that age forever, so they can have a baby even at the age of 50 with no greater chance of miscarriage or Down syndrome than they had at 30.” Here is what Patchett’s straight-talking Swenson would say about that: “Perhaps instead of trying to reproduce themselves, these postmenopausal women who want to be mothers could adopt up some of the excess [children] that surely will be available.” The novel explicitly portrays the difficulty of childbearing for an older woman. Maybe the ovaries would keep working, but how about the hips? The bladder? What about sheer exhaustion? Marina suspects there is something addictive in the “fenneled bark” that “kept the Lakashi women trudging back to the trees long after they were sick to death of babies.” There is indeed a narcotic quality to the Lakashi tree bark, maybe not unlike the American addiction to “having it all,” the delusion that all desires must be fulfilled. Even when we know better, our thoughts gnaw at what we don’t have. Endless possibility is lovely. The secret grove of the elixir of fertility is the most enduring image in the novel. Picture an airy stand of tall trees with “buttery yellow” bark and pale oval leaves sprouting from branches high above the ground. Flitting about in the dappled light are lavender moths, which lay their eggs in the bark. The trees and moths are found nowhere else in the world. The key to fertility lies in the combination of the moth larvae and the bark. Unless they are pregnant, the Lakashi women come to this grove to gnaw on the trees. Of course, Marina imbibes. The fruitful bark, which is “nearly soft, yielding. It offered up the slightest amount of pulpy liquid that tasted of fennel and rosemary. …” Toward the end of the novel, she’s hooked. “She wanted to stuff herself with the bark, to turn herself into medical evidence before she went home. Her goal was to make up for all the bark she hadn’t eaten in the past and anticipate the bark she would never eat in the future.” Alas, she doesn’t try the magic mushrooms. Even more potent than the Bodhi tree bark of boundless babies are the glowing, blue mushrooms, “each cap a perfect golf ball on a tall, slender stem,” growing prolifically at the base of the trunks. “Your passport to spiritual enlightenment,” one of the scientists says in describing the blue caps, central to Lakashi rituals. They too grow only in this grove and can’t be grown in a lab, not even in the same soil.
One of the reasons Swenson and the others keep secret the location of their research is these mushrooms. “This place would be overrun,” says one of the scientists, “drug dealers, the Brazilian government, other tribes, German tourists, there’s no telling who would get here first and what sort of war would ensue. … [T]he Lakashi would be destroyed.” We of the civilized world, Patchett seems to say, are pretty barbaric when it comes to getting what we want. This is a rich novel with many fun twists and lots of questions about desire, entitlement, ethics, childbearing and the limits of nature and technology. Fertility bark? Maybe not. But about those blue mushrooms. …
1
2
Advertisement Previous item: The American Scream: Going Hoarse Without Speaking Next item: God Bless Cantankerous Old Men New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By nat, September 20, 2011 at 4:30 pm Link to this comment
Something is unsettling about having kids at 60…...we weren’t made that way for a
Report thisreason!
By adrienrain, August 7, 2011 at 12:58 am Link to this comment
I’d take it…..........but I wouldn’t have children.
Report thisBy JEA, August 2, 2011 at 12:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I remember listening to a talk radio program years ago (before all the extremism) where the host was talking about older men having children. And as old men were calling in talking about how great it was to have a toddler running around while they were in their 60s, all I could think was how these kids would lose their fathers so young.
Report thisBy Queenie, July 31, 2011 at 12:36 pm Link to this comment
How about fixing the rest of the planet before going off and having MORE children @ age 50 - 60 or whatever. Huh? How about thinking of Mother Earth just ONCE and the destruction over-population is causing right now without adding a mess of orphans to the mix.
Millions of humans are suffering from disease and starvation and some people think adding MORE is beneficial in some way?
Morons.
Report thisBy purplewolf, July 31, 2011 at 9:28 am Link to this comment
We already have women who are giving birth in their 60’s and 70’s now thanks to medical science. One woman in England had 2 children in her late 60’s and died when the oldest child was about 5. This is devastating for her children as this woman had no husband or other children. Who will care for these kids ?
If the PTB could make every woman fertile until death, I believe the radicals who are trying to end all abortion/ birth control now, would make it mandatory that all women would be forced into that situation. Their only goal is to make more and more excessive humans on the planet, never mind that the earth is running out of resources to provide a “healthy” life for all of the current population.
We can hope that this never happens. Women are people, not machines to constantly pop out an endless supply of slaves and cannon fodder for the use and abuse of governments and their minions.
Report thisBy M, July 31, 2011 at 9:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Relax, it’s just fiction.
Report thisBy Textynn, July 31, 2011 at 9:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hormones keep a body young. I would never want to have
Report thisa baby late in life but hormones would make you live
longer, stronger, and keep up sex drives which makes
life more exciting and keeps women feeling “in the
game”. I think it’s great and I don’t believe hormones
are deadly. I think the longer people live the heaver
their toxic load. I think that is the source of the
problems.
By prisnersdilema, July 30, 2011 at 6:59 am Link to this comment
If you have ever enjoyed the privilege of caring for a new born, nurturing a child through
infancy, child hood, and adolescence, you would understand why having children later in
life, is a very bad idea.
The elderly, may have experience to offer as grandparents, but hurting a child requires
high energy and a closer identification with the worlds current living situation.
Having children at sixty means parents would be approaching mid seventies when their
children hit adolescence, I wonder if they would understand the life their child is faced
with or even feel comfortable with the technology.
Once again, the children’s needs were not considered, but they are treated as objects
equivalent to a possession to be acquired. How selfish.
Please don’t rationalize, a response with anecdotal evidence of the wonders of elderly
parent hood, stop kidding yourself with pleasant and comforting dreams, nature has had
it right all along.
The grotesquerie of a nation of aging Octomoms, would be a testament to our depravity,
Report thisand nothing more.
By anna, July 30, 2011 at 6:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hhhmmm. Why bear children until you die and leave them parentless? That is not
Report thisa formula for preservation or “health” . . . unless, of course, the plan is to have the
children inhabit a land akin to Lord of the Flies. Sounds like a “keep them
barefoot and pregnant” plan to me.
By cherilyn, July 29, 2011 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment
Nope, not even close.
There’s one part of the ending that could be said to be predictable. And the hero’s
Report thisjourney/quest elements do continue to the end. But none of the rest that you
say…. Read the book!
By SarcastiCanuck, July 29, 2011 at 11:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Let me guess the rest.The boring maiden destroys the executive branch of the evil pharmaceutical company,finds a handsome male hero who gives her multiple orgasms,vacuums the carpets and slays dragons,brings the world saving drug to the world at no cost to mankind,then dissapears into anonymous bliss with her Old Spice Guy in tow.Ahhhhh,I love a happy ending…..Where can I get some of those blue mushrooms?
Report this