Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 22, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates






American Catch


Truthdig Bazaar

Sutton

By J.R. Moehringer
$27.99

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Mencken, a Curmudgeon for the Ages

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 10, 2010

By Michael Dirda

(Page 2)

In his own time, this prolific reviewer welcomed Scott Fitzgerald and rightly maintained that “No romantic novel ever written in America, by man or woman, is one-half so beautiful as [Willa Cather’s] ‘My Antonia’”. Again and again Mencken argued that nearly all “superior fiction” focused on “character in decay” and typically ended with the hero’s defeat or destruction. In light of this tragic sense of life, he believed that poetry’s purpose was to “soothe our agonies with emollient words”. As a result, he preferred those poets who were down to earth, a bit folksy: Edgar Lee Masters, Carl Sandburg, Edwin Arlington Robinson, Robert Frost. Still, he was drawn to Edna St Vincent Millay for her “voluptuousness” and late in life visited Ezra Pound when the poet was incarcerated at St Elizabeths Hospital for the insane. On the whole, though, Modernism was a closed book to Mencken: “Our poets get into print regularly with stuff so bizarre and unearthly that only Christian Scientists can understand it”.

While he might sing the praises of the authors he admired, admonish those who had lost their way, and vigorously defend any censured by prudes and preachers, Mencken could really lay into those he judged to be second- and third-rate. He describes the sentimental novels of Henry Sydnor Harrison as “100,000 word Christmas cards”. Of one novel from the South he wrote, “Here, obviously, is the best that Mississippi can do, in theme and treatment – and it is such puerile, blowsy stuff that reviewing it realistically would be too cruel”. (Happily, the novel’s author was one Harris Dickson and not William Faulkner.) He’s even more damning about the Kansas littérateur William Allen White, whose works still turn up in second-hand bookshops:

“If William Allen White lives as long as Tennyson, and does not reform, our grandchildren will see the Victorian era gasping out its last breath in 1951. And eighty-three is no great age in Kansas, where sin is unknown. It may be, in fact, 1960, or even 1970, before the world hears the last of Honest Poverty, Chaste Affection and Manly Tears. For so long as White holds a pen these ancient sweets will be on sale at the department-store book-counters, and they will grow sweeter and sweeter. … If you yearn to uplift and like to sob, then the volume [In the Heart of a Fool] will probably affect you, in the incomparable phrase of Clayton Hamilton, like “the music of a million Easter-lilies leaping from the grave and laughing with a silver singing.” But if you are a carnal fellow, as I am, with a stomach ruined by alcohol, it will gag you.”

 

book cover

 

H.L. Mencken: Prejudices: The Complete Series

 

By H.L. Mencken

 

Library of America, 1,408 pages

 

Buy the book

What Mencken particularly loathes is the American tendency to “a highly self-conscious and insipid correctness, a bloodless respectability, a submergence of matter in manner”. Little wonder that he assailed those who would ban Theodore Dreiser’s Sister Carrie and James Branch Cabell’s mildly lubricious comic fantasy Jurgen. Great American fiction, Mencken contended, in what might almost be the prescription for a mid-career Saul Bellow novel, should embrace “the whole, gross, glittering, excessively dynamic, infinitely grotesque, incredibly stupendous drama of American life”. Certainly young people in the 1920s found Mencken liberating. He repeatedly denounced and satirized Prohibition, religious mania, the duplicity of politicians, any appearance of the bogus and self-serving, and every sort of do-goodism. He argued for the rights of the people he called “Aframericans”. Yet he also detested jazz, couldn’t perceive any artistic merit in film – though he did once interview a weary-hearted Rudolph Valentino – and he greatly disliked seeing couples wriggling “to the tune of some villainous mazurka from the Mississippi levees”.

More disturbingly, his essays occasionally disparage the immigrant masses, expound on the benefits of racial purity and the dangers of the mixing of blood, and repeatedly make vast generalizations about the Southerner and the New Englander, the Anglo-Saxon and the German. Though there’s no overt anti-Semitism in Prejudices, Mencken’s diaries and some private autobiographical volumes – not published until after his death – do contain offensive remarks about the Jews. It almost goes without saying that several of his closest friends were Jewish, including George Jean Nathan, his co-editor of The Smart Set and The American Mercury, and Alfred Knopf, his publisher. For some readers, however, the crude aspersions found in these posthumous volumes discredit Mencken’s entire work.

While H. L. Mencken can be truculent and mouthy in a terribly American way, he always viewed himself as a cut above the common herd, indeed, as a kind of libertarian aristocrat. He felt that most of us really were boobs. “The average American is a prude and a Methodist under his skin.” In one of his most famous pieces, “The Sahara of the Bozart”, he depicts the post-Civil War South as a wasteland, empty of culture, education and literature, where “the arts, save in the lower reaches of the gospel hymn, the phonograph and the chautauqua harangue, are all held in suspicion”.

Though Mencken might look to be nothing but a cigar-chomping pug, his values were those of a noble and proudly independent gentleman. “What ails the beautiful letters of the Republic, I repeat, is what ails the general culture of the Republic – the lack of a body of sophisticated and civilized public opinion, independent of plutocratic control and superior to the infantile philosophies of the mob – a body of opinion showing the eager curiosity, the educated skepticism and the hospitality to ideas of a true aristocracy.” Above all, like any self-sufficient aristocrat, he loathed big government. “All government, in its essence, is a conspiracy against the superior man: its one permanent object is to police him and cripple him.” Mencken insists that “the ideal government of all reflective men, from Aristotle to Herbert Spencer, is one which lets the individual alone – one which barely escapes being no government at all”. (Here he sounds like a proto-Ayn Rand.) American history, he notes, is sadly little more than “a history of minorities put down with clubs”.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, December 13, 2010 at 2:07 am Link to this comment

Mencken was bright it seems from his writings, and incorrect in many summations ( as we ALL can identify within ourselves if one can stoop that low in humility ).

He found himself on the outs of his society, perhaps because he knew too much of some realities, and juxtaposed he too knew too little of the things only discussed but not experienced.

Like much of the banter on Truth Dig between folks who think themselves to be high thinkers and credentialed learners… oh hypocrites are we, myself leading the procession.

Anyone here ever read “Lies My Teacher Told Me” by James Loewen?  A great correction the revisionists of U.S. history, the cowards.

For folks who ‘see’ or believe, this book adds to the paradigm shift and the AdMINI$tration’s attempt to continue as a dominant force much akin to empires of old. 

Continuity of Government was what the coup was called on Sept. 11th.

It is NOT the book for racist conservatives concerned only with wealth and position having their capital resources further subduing the immigrant labor force, both domestic and abroad.

Sins of omission this book is, an enjoyment and tough truth pill to swallow at the same time.

“You take the red pill, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

Report this

By felicity, December 12, 2010 at 1:42 pm Link to this comment

And of course it must be remembered of Mencken that
like the true cynic he was, he didn’t even believe
himself.

Report this

By montymouse, December 11, 2010 at 10:20 pm Link to this comment

Mencken. He’s an American writer, not a British one. I am a Brit. His critical verbage, which is above, sounds very over the top and easy to produce even if you have never been exposed to what you are criticizing. A man who learns German to read Neitzche, whom I had to read to understand our present age, is potentially a Nazi. I can’t see anything in the above article that would make me want to have anything to do with this writer. He sounds like a man who was all style and no content.

Report this
Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, December 11, 2010 at 5:23 pm Link to this comment

What a pleasant discovery… for this fellow to be called a curmudgeon and possibly be historically coined as such because he ‘saw’ in his time what most ignore or accept blindly, is sad.

If this stuff is considered heavy… my how the reading level has plummeted for mankind, for this ‘banter’ is merely the introduction to what really ‘is.’ 

As Clinton put it- “That all depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.”

Report this
Egomet Bonmot's avatar

By Egomet Bonmot, December 10, 2010 at 9:57 pm Link to this comment

Beg to differ, Rico, the Prejudices volumes are as easy to read as anything you’d pick up at the airport.  If anything it’s the elitism that would grate with Truthdig readers.  Mencken is wonderful in small doses—any more than that and the class anxiety starts to shine through.  OK, we’re not Europe, got it.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, December 10, 2010 at 6:37 pm Link to this comment

Mencken is way too deep for the average TDer. Don’t bother.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.