Top Leaderboard, Site wide
July 10, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Where Does the Buck Stop?




Gays in the Military
The Most Dangerous Book


Truthdig Bazaar
George Orwell: Diaries

George Orwell: Diaries

Edited by Peter Davison
$39.95

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Allen Barra on Cornelius Vanderbilt

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 22, 2009
book cover

By Allen Barra

(Page 2)

Instead, Stiles takes a much more daring approach and presents Vanderbilt as a hero, not a hero as in a Hollywood film or even the cartoonish Ayn Rand type, but more like a classic figure with all of his virtues and flaws rendered in sharp relief. Here was a man who, in building his steamship trade, “had acted like a Viking prince, taking his fleet wherever trade or plunder seemed most promising, freely abandoning markets for a price.” At the same time, “There was something Homeric in this uneducated man’s conception of himself. ... Like Odysseus he would face ocean storms, river rapids, tropical fevers, and the crocodiles and sharks of Nicaragua’s waters. These trips would further open his eyes to the world and enhance his heroic reputation.” And if he was a tyrant, “at least he made the trains run on time—and profitably.” 

This Viking/Greek sailor put a uniquely American tinge to the notion of great wealth: he was no member of “an affected aristocracy, the patricians of puffery.” To Jacksonian Democrats, writes Stiles, “who championed laissez-faire as an egalitarian creed, he had epitomized the entrepreneur as champion of the people, the businessman as revolutionary.”

 

book cover

 

The First Tycoon: The Epic Life of Cornelius Vanderbilt

 

By T.J. Stiles

 

Knopf, 736 pages

 

Buy the book

The pseudo-brokers in the movie “The Boiler Room” would better have stopped watching scenes from “Wall Street” and read “The First Tycoon”: “When I have some money,” Vanderbilt once said, “I buy railroad stock or something else. But I don’t buy on credit. I pay for what I get. People who live too much on credit generally get brought up with a round turn in the long run. The Wall street averages ruin many a man there, and is like faro.” Tell us about it, Commodore.

In perhaps his most significant accomplishment in “The First Tycoon,” Stiles celebrates Vanderbilt’s colossal achievements without succumbing to the Commodore’s spell: “With the wave of one hand he created tens of millions in new wealth; with a wave of the other, he crushed his enemies; with cold-eyed calculation, he gambled with the lives of millions. The American people were fortunate that he gambled so well, but they had no say in how he placed his bets. Black Friday posed a great question: What was the place of a railroad king in a democracy of equals?”

It’s a question that hasn’t been answered 132 years after his death, but there should be no confusion of the issues. The ways in which Cornelius Vanderbilt created enormous wealth helped create enormous wealth for an entire country. He helped make New York into the city we have come to know and spurred San Francisco into a major city by providing tens of thousands with the transportation to get there after the California gold rush in 1849. He was the major impetus behind the most important business of the 19th century—railroads—and by ferrying so many future Californians to Panama, he can be regarded the grandfather of the Panama Canal. 

In short, as Stiles puts it, “Probably no other individual made an equal impact over such an extended period on America’s economy and society. Over the course of his 66-year career, he stood on the forefront of change, a modernizer from beginning to end. He vastly improved and expanded the nation’s transportation infrastructure, contributing to a transformation of the very geography of the United States.”

His fortune was nearly incalculable; by the time of his death in 1877, “virtually every American had paid tribute to his treasure.” His power was immeasurable. (A statement falsely attributed to him by the popular early 20th century historian Matthew Josephson—“What do I care about the law? Hain’t I got the power?”—was nonetheless accurate.)

Given that wealth and power, Vanderbilt could easily have been a madman or the soulless despot that Mark Twain thought him to be. What’s amazing is the degree to which his fortune seemed to sober him. He made and played by his own rules—“the gentleman’s code of business combat.”  Vanderbilt did not believe in the creation of wealth by simply rearranging numbers on paper or manipulating Wall Street. To the greatest capitalist the world has ever seen, unfettered trade and unrestrained competition never meant a world without rules.

Allen Barra is a contributing editor to American Heritage and writes about sports and the arts for The Wall Street Journal. His latest book is “Yogi Berra, Eternal Yankee,” just released by W.W. Norton.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Spiritgirl, May 26, 2009 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment

I may not ever read this, but it does give a different side of one of the founding dynasty patriarchs.  Although he may have founded his empire on hard work and thrift, I wonder what he would have made of the thieves that currently run Wall Street?  Or that his heirs too are gaming the system - because they are “to the manor born”!? 

The sad truth is that the wealthy have rigged the system to favor themselves, and have convinced the average man voting that it is the ones griping about the unfair system that are the problem, not that the rich are ripping off the average Joe!

Report this

By samosamo, May 24, 2009 at 9:38 am Link to this comment

I haven’t read this and not that I never will but it is enlightening, this review, when I see mention of ‘unfettered trade’, ‘crushing his enemies(competion), ‘not spending more that he made in a week’ and ‘the father/inventor of corporations and I guess the ‘unfettered’ part is what brings me up to today and the metamorphosis to a ‘control fraud’ based method of ‘doing business’, that converts the measures to prevent runaway fraud, extortion, grand larceny and the destruction of a democracy now being practiced in the ‘modern’ day version of corporate america as the new and amazingly accepted way of ‘doing business’.

And I guess though in actuality he was not the first in all of this, he maybe perfected it to work to his advantage and thus began, those after him, working to game the system to get and take more than is healthy for a real society to benefit from what would be a less hostile world to live.

No excuses from me, I look at anyone wanting to ‘do business’ that has the faux ‘win-win’ moniker attached to it as just another charlatan trying to rob any and all people of their possessions because it kind of says they have the right to do so and you don’t have the right to oppose or object.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.