|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
When Jewish Upon a StarPosted on Dec 2, 2011
By Mr. Fish The voice on the other end of the telephone needed to make sure that I was 21. I wasn’t. “I’m 22,” I said, lying, figuring that 19 might as well be 22 and, anyway, this was a comedy club that I was scheduling an audition for, not the Moonlite Bunny Ranch or the FBI. My heroes at the time were Woody Allen, Jackie Mason, Philip Roth, Neil Simon, Irving Howe, Erich Fromm, Allen Ginsberg, Arthur Miller, Abraham Maslow, S. J. Perelman, Paul Krassner, Abbie Hoffman and Groucho Marx. I’d decided, over the previous 18 months while slowly dripping out of college, that if I was ever going to succeed as a Jewish comedian and writer I needed to stop being a South Jersey Protestant virgin fine arts major at Rutgers University with Han Solo hair and Top-Siders and move to New York to have my inner David Cassidy exorcised from my soul, kneed in the stomach and tossed into a rack of dirty trash cans somewhere in Boro Park or Crown Heights. My fascination with Judaism began when I was 14, right around the time I decided the tribe that I belonged to—the one with the John Wayne narration, the street address of Downtown Disney: Reality in 3-Quarter Scale Facade! and the bizarre Ameri-Christian logic, call it blatant nepotism, that had cast super-WASP Charlton Heston in the role of Moses—was neither honest nor intellectually curious enough to reflect the truth of existence nor the dark complexities of the human experience. Judaism, on the other hand, as evidenced by several thousand years of recorded history and vast amounts of art and literature and kvetching, seemed to thrive on a tradition of critical self-analysis as opposed to the self-glorification of Technicolored Anglo-Saxonism. In fact, after a rather intense week over Christmas vacation in which I’d devoured “Der Antichrist” by Friedrich Nietzsche, “The Future of an Illusion” by Sigmund Freud and both “Night” and “The Trial of God” by Elie Wiesel, I suddenly realized that the atheistic evangelism that I so naturally gravitated toward was not only not wholly scientific, but actually found many of its most prominent champions and sympathizers, including Baruch Spinoza, Emma Goldman, Jacques Derrida and Karl Marx, coming from Jewish origins. Even among theists who practiced the religion, rabbis included, skepticism and rigorous debate seemed to prevent the junking up of Judaism with all the superfluous voodoo and super and subhuman mascots and harrowingly hierarchical idolatry exemplified by other religions, such as Catholicism, Consumer Capitalism and Fascism. Every day people are straying away from the church and going back to God.— Lenny Bruce “You know, they’re probably going to have to take some skin off the back of your legs for this,” said my friend, Derek, one day after school while paging through the Yellow Pages in search of a plastic surgeon. I was at his house, as I was most afternoons, drinking a highball glass of NyQuil, which I was doing only because his parents were out and it was almost New Year’s and he was driving. I had been complaining about the size of my nose all day long, saying that I wished I had a bigger one, something more Semitic and less Debbie Reynolds, and he was tired of hearing about it. “I don’t know why they can’t make one bigger,” I said. “They make boobs bigger, for Chrissake!” Then Derek made the comment about the extra skin. Then I changed my mind. “Are you sure?” asked Derek. “Don’t you want to be a bigger boob?” You should have your anti-Semitic head blown off, you fucking piece of dog shit!!!! That was just one of the many suggestions made by one of the people thoughtful enough to email me in January 2009 in response to a cartoon that I’d posted online depicting Holocaust survivors holding up signs in support of the 1,000-plus Palestinians killed during what the Israelis called Operation Cast Lead and what the Arab world called the Gaza Massacre. Who better to speak in solidarity with an oppressed and quarantined and sadistically tortured population, I figured, than another famously and morbidly oppressed and quarantined and sadistically tortured population, the ethnicity of either population being grossly unimportant in the face of their common humanity? Even my older brother, Jeff, was emailing me, although the subject of his correspondence had less to do with defending the actions of Israel and more to do with the resistance tactics of Hamas, which had been firing hundreds of Qassam rockets into Southern Israel in retaliation against the IDF’s never-ending siege of Gaza—rockets that had killed, from 2000 to 2009, 22 Israelis, prompting me to wonder how devastating the retaliation might’ve been had Hamas been launching corn dogs instead, knowing that heart disease is responsible for killing upward of 600,000 people every year. Jeff: (via email) I guess this is what we’re seeing, the final, horrible, inexcusable but typical final stages of a war. To quote Gandhi: “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.” Hamas fights on, Israel fights on, the evil it does is permanent.
1
2
3
NEXT PAGE >>>
Advertisement Previous item: Corporate Wolf Eats Grandmother Alive Next item: Alan Moore Comes to the Rescue of Occupy Wall Street New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By heterochromatic, December 7, 2011 at 9:37 am Link to this comment
balkas~~~~~ are “sephardo-ashkenazic people [s] are in
Report thiscontrol of” you?
or is it just gas?
By balkas, December 7, 2011 at 9:24 am Link to this comment
in palestina, since ca ‘49, shemites [mostly] are killing shemites. the true jews
and/or hebrews appear to be the shemites which for ca 2-3k yrs and until ‘49 lived
in iraq, magreb countries, egypt, syria, yemen, lebanon.
people called palestinians are descendants of ancient canaanites or hamites,
Report thishebrews, hittites, nabateans, arameans. all of these peoples or tribes where
descendants of noah’s two sons, shem or ham.
what now divides israelites and palestinians is mostly the two cults. and it does not
seem that islamic cult is going to lose the war with talmudic; and much tinier cult.
so, one day israel as a talmudic or judaistic solely state will be destroyed.
expecting this outcome, ashkenazic peoples are not immigrating into this artificial
state and future hell; especially for rabid judaists.
besides sephardo-ashkenazic people [s] are in control of u.s more than any other
ethnos; so why go to tiny, impoverished, much hated a region called israel?
thus, it is an enigma to me why world ‘jewry’ [nonshemitic people] avoids peace in
excanaan—the land of the hebrews-arabs; descendants of shem, noah’s eldest, or
ham, noah’s second son [of course, according to the legend] tnx
By vince remus, December 6, 2011 at 5:57 pm Link to this comment
Your article is extremely valuable and truly radical.
An awareness that people who are truly in favor of
social justice must take a stand against bigotry and
racism no matter the target.
The comments to the article are all making good
Report thispoints relative to the gist of their respective
messages, but how do Israel and Palestine achieve
sustainable peace in the future is the only
discussion that should be taken place if they are to
live peacefully?
By Jacob, December 6, 2011 at 3:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You “forgot” that Hamas has clearly stated that its objective is the destruction of Israel and the establishment of a Palestinian state, extending from the Mediterranean sea to the Jordan river.
You also “forgot” that rocket fire continued even after Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip to the last inch. If, immediately after Israel left the Gaza Strip, all terror activity from that area ceased. Which means no rocket launching, no weapons smuggling, no efforts to send suicide murderers into Israel then all the crossing points would have remained open, there would have been free merchandise exchange, and thousands of Gazans would have been able to work in Israel. This would have made the Gaza economy much stronger and made further Israeli withdrawals from the West Bank much easier.
However, as you are supposed to know, the Palestinians chose to continue their war of terror and continued to fire rockets at Israeli towns and villages on a daily basis. And of course you know that the residents there have 15 seconds to reach shelter from the moment the alarm sound. Imagine the feeling of a mother, who has children at school, when the alarm sounds.
Report thisYou should read the Geneva Convention, which states in Part III, Section I, Article 28: “The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.” This means that when the Hamas combatants fire their weapons and hide among civilians, they are not immune from attack. Also, if civilians get hurt, the responsibility lies with those who hide among civilians and endanger their lives.
As long as the Palestinian terrorists continue with their war, Israel will do its best to protect its citizens, whether you like it or not.
By kazy, December 5, 2011 at 7:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@Lockwood “Contrary to what the article says… it is the lack of critical self analysis that continuously lands Jews in trouble. He believes Israel’s behavior and the behavior of the powerful lobbies that act on its behalf (like AIPAC in the USA and similar powerful organizations in every western country) risk a huge backlash.”
So that’s the reason why Jews are always in trouble - because they’re not self analytical enough because if they were more self critical, they wouldn’t be in trouble all the time and there would be no antisemitism - or less of it? Wow!! Who knew? Do you really believe that? That’s amazing. First of all, the above reference of Jewish Lobbyists and Israeli policy has no more to do with being a Jew than those brutal African dictators have in being black or American policy makers who are Christians. We sure do go out of our way to separate Islam and Muslims from their brutal dictators and their violent regimes. But Jews? Not so much. I think if you really want to find a common denominator in the brutality and greed and destruction that exists in this world try looking at the gender: MEN. They’re all men and I think we should round them all up and lock them away and we would see a lot of the world’s problems lessen. It’s funny that no one attacks that very glaring culprit. Secondly, you don’t hang around a lot of Jews it seems. Never was their a group of people that questions EVERYTHING - even God’s motivation for doing the stupid things he does sometimes. Try reading just a bit of the Talmud and then tell me Jews don’t engage in an excessive amount of critical self analysis to the point where you want to blow your brains out. I think that there’s something a bit more behind Jews getting into “trouble” than meets the eye here, that perhaps you and this Gilad guy seem to think that Jewish people bring about their own destruction, that they cause others to hate them. I think that’s what you’re trying to say. That there’s something inherently not likable about Jewish people. I think you have maybe a love/hate relationship with Jewish people. Or maybe just a hate relationship.
Report thisBy balkas, December 4, 2011 at 10:28 am Link to this comment
and the people holding a sign supporting murder of 1k shemites were
selves shemitic???
and most supporters of the those shemitic butchers were nonshemitic
[or nonsemitic christians] and nonshemitic [but semitic]
talmudists/mosheists.
it seems that euro-asians with the mosheic cult believe that noah had
Report thisfour sons and not just three and that the oldest and most important was
sem and shem.
arabs stemming from shem and the ashkenazim from sem; thus are
semites and i am antisemitic for saying this. good, anything—just don’t
call me an antishemite—thank u.
By M Henri Day, December 3, 2011 at 10:31 am Link to this comment
I note, «heterochromatic», that you share «EmileZ»‘s interest in a certain part of the human anatomy (perhaps you share the pseudonyms as well ?) and his/her lack of discretion in making said interest a matter of public knowledge. Good on ya - do keep on trying !...
Henri
Report thisBy John Poole, December 3, 2011 at 9:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Speaking truth to power: America’s epithat:
What a tragedy for all humans that the the little boy along the parade route in a
distant land watching King America roll past had to be a “raghead” kid wearing a
suicide vest. Are the “homelanders” listening?
Mr Fish was the little kid we should have listened to years ago.
Report thisPS. No! I don’t know him or wish he was my son or cousin.
By M Henri Day, December 3, 2011 at 4:30 am Link to this comment
With a grandmother like that, one can’t go wrong (I say, before realising that your brother Jeff shared her with you)....
Henri
Report thisBy heterochromatic, December 2, 2011 at 7:09 pm Link to this comment
Nobody who ever attended Rutgers would be eating Velveeta rather than Cheeze
Report thisWhiz!!!
By Lockweed, December 2, 2011 at 6:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There is a new book out by the Israeli-Briton Gilad Atzmon. Atzmon served in the Israeli army in 1982 and after his experiences became a critic of Israel. He is a popular Jazz musician and interesting (and controversial) writer.
Contrary to what the article says, “Judaism, on the other hand…seemed to thrive on a tradition of critical self-analysis as opposed to the self-glorification of Technicolored Anglo-Saxonism”, Atzmon believes it is the lack of critical self analysis that continuously lands Jews in trouble. He believes Israel’s behavior and the behavior of the powerful lobbies that act on its behalf (like AIPAC in the USA and similar powerful organizations in every western country) risk a huge backlash.
His book is called “The Wandering Who?”. Its criticism of separateness and chosen-ness (the “Chosen People”) appears to be a major part of the book. I haven’t read his book, but I plan to do so.
Report thisBy EmileZ, December 2, 2011 at 6:34 pm Link to this comment
A giraffe walks into a bar and says…
“The highballs are on me!!!”
Get it???
Get it???
(“Hat tip” to Steve Albini)
Gandhi’s version of non-violent tactics was so extreme that it was in fact incredibly violent.
He expected his followers to “walk smilingly in to a barrage of machine gun fire” (I don’t remember the exact quote, but words to that effect), and viewed their deaths as a cause for celebration. He sent letters to their families congratulating them when someone was killed.
For him, I suppose, after the first mass-murder or two, there was no going back.
He also said that if you don’t have the “moral courage” to use non-violent tactics, it is your duty to employ others in the face of tyranny and oppression, including violence, and to do otherwise is to be less than human.
(“Hat tip” to Norman G. Finkelstein)
Report this