|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
What Does Your Feminism Look Like?Posted on Dec 7, 2011
Excerpted from “F ’em! Goo Goo, Gaga, and Some Thoughts on Balls” by Jennifer Baumgardner. THE FIRST WAVE (approximately 1840-1920) The First Wave grew out of the movement to abolish slavery. That movement, and the ensuing one dedicated to women’s rights, drew from the ideals and disappointments of the new democracy. These Americans, many of them Quakers, believed that it was their moral responsibility to oppose slavery. The women who were active in this movement soon discovered that they, as females, didn’t have the rights that they were agitating for black men to have. As just one example, many women traveled with their husbands across the Atlantic to a historic abolitionist conference in London, only to be barred from entering once they arrived. They applied their raised consciousness, organizing skills, and philosophical template to themselves and fought this exclusion. Their strategies and technology included creating the Declaration of Sentiments (based on the Declaration of Independence, but including women), making speeches, writing books, and organizing marches. If the First Wave had to be boiled down to one goal, it was rights of citizenship. The most important symbol of citizenship in a democracy is the right to vote, which suffragists asked for in July 1848, to universal ridicule, and achieved seventy-two years and one month later, on August 20, 1920. En route to the vote, these feminists changed our culture, shepherding in dress reform, birth control, and granting to women the right to own property, get divorced, be educated, keep their income and inheritance, and retain custody of their children. Alice Paul, a crucial organizer for women’s suffrage, quickly identified that a vote in such an unequal nation was less powerful than it could or should be. In 1923, she introduced the Lucretia Mott Amendment, also known as the Equal Rights Amendment, or ERA. THE SECOND WAVE (APPROXIMATELY 1960-1988) Like the First Wave, the Second Wave grew out of an enormous social justice movement—the civil rights movement, which was reaching its apex in the early 1960s. Young people of all races flocked to the movement, eager to be a part of finishing the work of ensuring rights to black Americans. Once again, women in this movement—as well as the peace, free speech, and gay rights movements—found that they themselves didn’t have the rights that they were agitating for on behalf of others. They turned their raised consciousness and organizing skills on themselves and created an independent women’s liberation movement (the preferred term of this band of feminists). The radical feminists of this era believed in full-scale revolution for the common good. The liberal feminists fought for women to share in the opportunities and responsibilities men had, including creating a career, pushing off the drudgery of housework, and refusing to be held hostage by their reproductive systems. The dominant goal of these feminists might be boiled down to equality—valuing equally that which was marked as female or feminine, such as knitting or childbirth, and having access to domains that had been exclusive to men. Second Wave feminists demonstrated that, given the opportunity or necessity, women could do what men did. They also made women’s activities visible and valuable. Their core beliefs stemmed from Marx, identifying women as an oppressed class and patriarchy as the illegitimate power over them. These feminists declared that they were the experts—not male doctors, shrinks, religious leaders, fathers, or husbands—when it came to abortion, rape, pregnancy, and female sexuality. They created language and resources for atrocities once just called “life”—such as date rape, domestic abuse, and illegal abortion. They lobbied for laws and court decisions to strike down legal inequality, such as Title IX, the Equal Pay Act, and Roe v. Wade. By the 1980s, the concept of women as a class with over-arching shared values and experiences was deeply splintered. Black women, women with disabilities, Latinas, lesbian and bisexual women, and others began critiquing the broad philosophies of the movement from within, causing splits that were rife with both tension and detailed feminist theory. The Combahee River Collective, a black feminist lesbian group that included Barbara Smith and Alexis De Veaux, created the theory of “interlocking oppressions.” This necessary deepening and expanding of feminist definitions coincided with a general backlash against feminism by people who wanted to undo the gains of the Second Wave. THE THIRD WAVE (APPROXIMATELY 1988-2010) The Third Wave grew out of an enormous cultural shift. By the late 1980s, a cohort of women and men who’d been raised with the gains, theories, flaws, and backlash of the feminist movement were beginning to come of age. Whether or not these individual men and women were raised by self-described feminists—or called themselves feminists—they were living feminist lives: Females were playing sports and running marathons, taking charge of their sex lives, being educated in greater numbers than men, running for office, and working outside the home. For those who were consciously feminist, the splits of the 1980s formed the architecture of their theories. Kimberle Crenshaw’s description of “intersectionality” drew on the work of the Combahee River Collective and advanced the idea that gender might be just one of many entry points for feminism. The Third Wave rejected the idea of a shared political priority list or even a set of issues one must espouse to be feminist. It inherited critiques of sexist dominant culture (having grown up in a feminist-influenced civilization) and embraced and created pop culture that supported women, from Queen Latifah to bell hooks to Riot Grrrl. Girlie feminists created magazines and fashion statements (and complicated the idea of what a feminist might look like). Sex positivity undermined the notion that porn and sex work are inherently demeaning, and revealed a glimpse of the range of potential sexual expression.
1
2
NEXT PAGE >>>
Advertisement Previous item: ‘Hugo’: Resistance Is Futile Next item: High Fashion in the Time of Recession New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By junebug, December 9, 2011 at 5:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
still waiting on feminists to get on the government about
Report thisthis horribly sexist selective service law where only men
under the age of 26 are required to sign up for. It
purports that men are somehow better than women. This isnt
equality.
By gerard, December 8, 2011 at 8:29 pm Link to this comment
My personal situation was apparently rare. I was born during World War I and reared under my liberal father’s influence, who told me from very early on, “You can do anything you want to do in this life, and I will do what I can to help you.” He followed through. I was de-indoctrinated and educated and encouraged to think and act. He was a science teacher.
Report thisI went to work after college at overworked, underpaid jobs, and was “passed over” for a job I very much wanted and was qualified for, due to being a female. I quit, got another job, got married, had three kids, worked part-time for many years and finally went into full-time teaching when my kids were in their teens.
My daughters-in-law hated me. To this day I am blamed by various relatives for being “too independent”, not “feminine enough,” “too rational”, and feared as being “too smart” and “too serious.” I can testify to a strong resistance to feminism among these women themselves, albeit semiconscious and/or concealed in order not to seem “backward.” Yet most of the family members who have subtly and openly opposed my “way of life” or “attitudes” wlll not confront these issues. They withdraw instead. If charged with being “anti-feminist” they would deny it.
I bring these points up, not because I enjoy doing so,or that I think I’m important, but because it might help in thinking about the issues raised in this book, and about feminism in general and whether or not its advancement has actually been held back by women ourselves, by either being “over-active” or “not active enough.” We are all “feeling our way” on these issues—which is an indication in itself.
(Meaning, we are not yet free enough to think our way through, let alone act our way through. We have only to look at the popularity of Christian fundamentalism to see that this is so.)
P.S. I think one huge problem is that women “naturally”? want to love and nurture and make peace in a world still predominantly managed by men, the most powerful of whom very often “couldn’t care less.” Evidence: The world situation from 1900 to 2010. It’s a sheer miracle that women (and others) could make any headway at all—and they did it with the help of men who bucked the system emotionally if not physically. Thanks for that!
By LillithMc, December 8, 2011 at 12:35 pm Link to this comment
For me the biggest change happened in the mid-1970’s when new laws allowed me to obtain a credit card without my husband’s signature and have my own bank accounts that he could not access. I was protected from debt he obtained that I had not signed. They also tightened the laws regarding child support. The other welcome change was in the 1960’s when jobs were no longer Help Wanted Men and Help Wanted Women.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, December 8, 2011 at 12:07 pm Link to this comment
I don’t really understand this excerpt; maybe I need to read the whole book. One problem I have with it is that I am not sure what the author means by ‘feminism’. Something probably ought to be well-defined before cutting it up into year-defined waves. Does the author herself know? One can’t tell from what’s here. (The author also talks about ‘my generation’, which does not encourage optimism.)
There are some significant data points which may be in the book, but seem to be ignored in the excerpt. It’s significant that radical feminists of the 1960s were vehemently concerned with changing not just the status of women but the condition of the surrounding social order as a whole, whereas the apparent model feminist of the 2000s was either a high corporate manager or a big-time politician arrogating 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling—of politics as usual—to herself. Someone might want to bridge that gap with more than waves, consumer products, or obscenities.
As for the radicals, I have at hand a pamphlet given me by a young woman titled ‘Why She Doesn’t Give A Fuck About Your Insurrection’. It seems like the anarchist bros have fallen behind even J.P. Morgan Chase Bank in adapting to the post-feminist era; at least Chase will make a girl into an associate assistant vice president, whereas it appears the main thing chicks get to do in the movement is put out (in the sense of serving as targets for scoring; I’m not talking about anything too erotic, too sensual, too emotional, here.) Things haven’t changed much since Stokely Carmichael told us what position women would have in his movement.
There’s some kind of problem out there, yes, but I don’t think counting waves is going to handle it.
Report thisBy Weak men troll articles on equality, December 8, 2011 at 12:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is that some kind of riddle, Raymond? Any sources to cite, perhaps? Or are you just horribly inept at using rhetoric?
Report thisBy Raymond Peringer, December 8, 2011 at 11:49 am Link to this comment
Recently, an Asian woman pregnant with a girl wanted to keep the child. Her male-dominated family forced her to have an abortion. Not one voice was heard from the feminine pro-choicers. Why?
Report thisBy SarcastiCanucks, December 8, 2011 at 9:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hey Embarrassed by SarcastiCanucks,pretty lofty pedestal you have placed yourself on buddy.Praise the oracle of intellect and compassion.I can see you have no self esteem issues.Please refrain from this though,I was more interested in a womans view,not a guy in touch with his feminine side.I’ll catch up with you at the school of poetic prose there Shakespeare….Oh yeah,I also love my mother and the lady in my life,so no analysis please…
Report thisBy Embarrassed by SarcastiCanucks, December 8, 2011 at 7:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@SarcastiCanuck
Oh you poor, simple creature. You sad, lonely, destitute soul.
We, the men of intellect and compassion, understand the fear and insecurity that change can bring about. We will not badger you for your hateful words, nor will we try to compete with you in your foolhardy attempt at verbal pugilism.
Please don’t be too terribly surprised when you, the steadfast pebble on the beach of unfortunate obstinacy, are washed away and buried under a rising tide. There are many others like you. We could have turned out like you.
But the saving grace of our species’ long lifespan is that it has a terminus. The trick of which is to be satisfied with one’s actions and words up until the very end - and not a moment less. We wish you the best of luck with that.
But you won’t keep anyone up at night.
Report thisBy SarcastiCanuck, December 7, 2011 at 1:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Huh???No wonder men now prefer the company of thier buddies.They don’t know what the hell your talking about anymore.Take over the world girls and see if you can do a better job.I’d be surprised because you all hate each other and want to be in control.Reproductive justice?What a bullshit rationalization expression for an abortion.Bring it on fembots….I’ll be watching this post.
Report this