LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 21, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Tumblr Is Worth $1.1 Billion to Yahoo for One Reason: You

Real American Boy: How Our Byzantine Immigration System and Failed Economy May Have Made a Terrorist

DOJ Allegedly Spied on Fox News Correspondent, the FBI Investigates Bachmann, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
 * NEW! * Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
 * NEW! * Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949

The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949

By Benny Morris (Author), Roger Owen (Editor), Edmund Burke (Editor), Michael C. Hudson (Editor), Walid Kazziha (Editor), Rashid Khalidi (Editor), Serif Mardin (Editor)

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Tony Platt on Rebecca Skloot’s Life of Henrietta Lacks

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 9, 2010
book cover

By Tony Platt

Rebecca Skloot, a science journalist on the faculty at the University of Memphis, has a smash, crossover hit with “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks,” an investigation into the ethics of medical research. Skloot’s first book is near the top of the New York Times best-seller nonfiction list, has been profiled on national news, and received the pop-culture imprimatur of “The Colbert Report.” Her timely reporting on an important topic is entertaining, cleverly organized and well written. So why does it leave me with a nagging sense of unease?

Henrietta Lacks was 31 years old, the African-American mother of five children, when she died in 1951 from cervical cancer in the colored ward of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore. Before her death, a doctor took samples of her tumors and tried, as scientists had unsuccessfully tried for decades, to keep them alive. Lacks made history when her cells not only survived, but also reproduced by the trillions. “They became,” writes Skloot, “the first immortal cells ever grown in a laboratory.” While Lacks’ cells became known all over the world to doctors and scientists as “HeLa” and indispensable to significant innovations in polio and cancer treatment, cloning, gene mapping and in vitro fertilization, the woman herself was largely forgotten by history. And for a long time after her death, her family was not even aware that Henrietta Lacks lived on in the many lives of HeLa.

As an undergraduate, Rebecca Skloot became “fixated” on the idea of writing a book that would be “a biography of both the cells and the woman they came from.” She read other accounts of how Henrietta Lacks became HeLa—for example, in stories published in Jet, Ebony and Rolling Stone in 1976—but none, in her opinion, did justice to either the humanity of the donor or the uses and misuses of her cells. Skloot wants to correct the record.

 

book cover

 

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

 

By Rebecca Skloot

 

Crown, 384 pages

 

Buy the book

Of the two narratives threaded throughout this book, the story of a scientific breakthrough and its consequences is compelling and informative. Skloot makes complex information accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing sophistication or condescending to nonexperts. She has a knack for bringing us into the everyday world of labs and illuminating the give and take of debates among scientists. Drawing upon a case study of HeLa, she also demonstrates how hospitals, the medical profession, scientists and the pharmaceutical industry colluded in withholding vital information from patients and profiting off their bodies and diseases throughout most of the 20th century. (It wasn’t until 1974 that a federal law was passed requiring informed consent from the subjects of federally funded research.) And in the case of African-American patients, such as Henrietta Lacks and members of her family, Skloot shows how racism added another deep layer of exploitation and humiliation.

Much has been written (see, for example, Harriet Washington’s “Medical Apartheid”) about the long history of racist medical practices against African-Americans: discriminatory access to medical resources, too little treatment too late, higher mortality rates than whites, disproportionate sterilizations in the name of eugenics, and notorious experiments—such as the Tuskegee syphilis study of the 1930s when the U.S. Public Health Service allowed hundreds of black sharecroppers in Alabama to risk death without treatment. Rebecca Skloot adds another chapter to this infamous history, demonstrating how doctors treated Henrietta Lacks with “benevolent deception”; how the patient and her family were not consulted or informed about the reproduction of her cells; how her medical records were made public without permission; and how HeLa fueled a “multibillion-dollar industry selling human biological materials,” while the family didn’t make a dime. Skloot’s book makes an important contribution to our understanding of the ethical issues that typically undergird important scientific developments.

To see long excerpts from “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks,” click here.

The author was not satisfied with sticking to a popular history of an important scientific topic. She chose also to delve into the everyday lives of the Lacks family and to document her own efforts to win the family’s trust. Unfortunately, there is a gee-whiz quality to the liberal author’s foray into the lives of inner-city families trying to survive perpetually hard times. While Skloot stands on solid ground when writing about and offering her opinions on science, her discussion of black urban life is tentative and often awkward, as when she warns us that some of the book’s dialogue “appears in native dialects.” 

The author promises candor and self-revelation in the first pages when she tells us that during the course of researching the book, she formed “a deep personal bond” with Deborah, her key informant and Henrietta Lacks’ daughter: “without realizing it, I’d become a character in her story, and she in mine.” But Rebecca’s character is undeveloped, while we are flooded with detailed and often irrelevant information about Deborah and her family. As a result, the book suffers from an inequality of disclosure.

It would have been interesting to read about the impact the project had on Skloot’s personal views about race, and her professional views about the social responsibilities of journalists. But she keeps a tight lid on her own stuff. During the course of the book we learn some unexplored facts: that she is white, middle-class and divorced, and has a penchant for dressing in black. She’s also agnostic, a rationalist, “half New York Jew and half Midwestern Protestant,” and tends “to leave the room when religion comes up in conversation.” This sets up the inevitable culture conflict—and dramatic arc of the book—with Deborah, who is poor and poorly educated, and not only “deeply religious,” but inclined to faith healing and voodoo. The bond between the two women is sealed when Skloot, irritated by Deborah’s mood swings (the result, she found out later, of high blood pressure), gets down and yells at her to “get the fuck off me and chill the fuck out.”

1   2   NEXT PAGE >>>

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Punk Icon Malcolm McLaren Dies at 64

Next item: Conan Takes His Late Night Antics to Cable



New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By lolly, April 15, 2010 at 12:47 pm Link to this comment

Insightful review, and I couldn’t agree more.  Ms. Skloot’s book, while on a truly fascinating topic, and at some points excellently written, continues the objectification of the Lacks family by refusing to acknowledge herself as a “character” in the story.  Certainly, she’s in there, but her self-portrayal seems dishonest in a way, one-sided, as if there were only one way to interpret the story.  You put it well, voyeuristic.  By absenting herself, she undermines her credibility, does not acknowledge the fact that she does have opinions (we hope/presume) about the issues she presents, and that those issues do color her writing.  Typical assumption of “benevolent outsider,” and completely disingenuous.

I DO recommend this book, but would love to have seen Skloot go further, and, in some places, not as far.

Report this

By Uraniabce, April 15, 2010 at 9:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have just finished this amazing book, and, with all due respect to Mr. Platt, one of the purposes of the book was to serve as a biography of Henrietta Lacks. Hers was not a happy life, and there were many reasons for that. The inequality and discrimination African Americans faced then and now, in matters of jobs, education, health care, and opportunities were very much a part of that. Ms. Skloot presents the raw, brutal facts of both Ms. Lacks and her daughters life to demonstrate how those forces shaped her families’ reaction to the knowledge of Henrietta’s “immortality”. As a white woman, born and raised in Canada, I found those passages revelatory, not prurient. This is how these people lived and live, and if you find those facts make uncomfortable reading, that just might be by design, not accident.

Report this
McTN's avatar

By McTN, April 11, 2010 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment

Sounds to me that the author lacked an editor who fully understood the project and could have guided Skloots to produce a better book. The profile of Henrietta through her dirty laundry must be the author’s clumsy way of injecting an inequality theme in the book.  She could have benefited from a co-authorship with a civil rights or african american historian to enrich the book beyond her training.

Editors are there to make suggestions that improve the work.  Most writers need them.

Report this

By grumpynyker, April 11, 2010 at 7:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Why don’t you fake liberals/leftists (aka soft racists)
track down Harriet A. Washington’s Medical Apartheid:
The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black
Americans from Colonial Times to the Present.

Report this

By marcus medler, April 10, 2010 at 2:14 pm Link to this comment

The primary pathology I get from this review
(infer the book) is America’s. The pervasive,
over riding inequality that is woven deep within
all aspects of American society are too much
for most to handle. At least, we can view from a
biographical lens the social malaise caused by
racism and poverty. I agree with the reviewer
that a personalization, despite the drama,
deflects from the social truth that causes and
allows the mess. I often think it is the,“promise”
of heaven that acts as the magma chamber for
our social, collective pathology.

Report this

By berniem, April 10, 2010 at 12:37 pm Link to this comment

Other than some flowery words and legislation purportedly to correct generations of bigotry and self-serving “christian” values, has anything really changed in this greed driven, me first country? I think not!

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 10, 2010 at 5:01 am Link to this comment

“Tony Platt on Rebecca Skloot’s Life of Henrietta Lacks”

Why am I not surprised that I am the only responder to this world-historically consequential post?

Call me a benighted rube, but all I can say is, Who? Who? and Who?

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.