|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
This Gay Man Represented the PresidentPosted on Feb 17, 2012
By Mel White “Fit to Serve: Reflections on a Secret Life, Private Struggle, and Public Battle James C. Hormel’s transformation from a confused and closeted gay kid to the nation’s first openly gay ambassador, chronicled in his memoir “Fit to Serve: Reflections on a Secret Life, Private Struggle, and Public Battle to Become the First Openly Gay Ambassador,” co-written with Erin Martin, is a fascinating journey into the world of privilege, politics and power. His memoir is intimate, explicit and revealing as it takes us below the surface to reveal his secret life and his public battle. Andrew Holleran, in Harvard’s Gay and Lesbian Review, writes, “Biographies are like mummies: In exchange for permanence, the vital fluids are removed.” Fortunately, Hormel does not drain the vital fluids from “Fit to Serve.” Hormel, an heir to the Hormel Foods fortune, may have been a child of privilege but the secret life he experienced as a young gay man is exactly like the secret life experienced by almost all young lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender people who are born into a world that neither understands nor accepts them. Those adults who haven’t yet come to terms with their sexual orientation will see their own private struggle mirrored in Hormel’s life as a closeted gay husband, father and lawyer with political aspirations whose desire for same-sex intimacy threatened to destroy everything he held dear.
Fit to Serve: Reflections on a Secret Life, Private Struggle, and Public Battle to Become the First Openly Gay U.S. Ambassador
By James C. Hormel (Author), Erin Martin (Author)
Skyhorse Publishing, 320 pages
And Hormel’s public battle to become the U.S. ambassador to Luxembourg reveals the vicious tactics of the religious right in its ongoing war against homosexuality and homosexuals. During Hormel’s childhood in Austin, Minn., he remembers feeling “different” from the other kids. And it wasn’t just that he was the son of Jay C. Hormel, president of Hormel Foods, or that he lived in a mansion surrounded by servants and bodyguards. “I was different for some other reason,” he writes. “As a kid I didn’t have any way of identifying the feeling and later, as a teenager, when I began to understand my ‘otherness,’ I worked very hard to avoid it. And deny it.” During his early adolescent years at the Asheville School for Boys, Hormel remembers wanting desperately to be liked. In spite of his valiant attempts to be the best little boy in the world, he spent those formative years feeling like an outcast, never fitting in, wondering “if something was wrong with me.” When a fellow student “cozied up” to him during a camping trip in the mountains, Hormel was “curiously excited” by the encounter but when he saw the boy the next day in class, “he would not acknowledge me.” Hormel cared more about those occasional “cozy” encounters than the other boys and he felt even more isolated and alone when “his own kind” rejected him. Hormel flunked his first year at Princeton (an exclusive men’s college at the time). “My hormones guided me away from my studies and toward other boys,” he writes. “It is already hard for a horny teenager to focus on school, but finding that your attraction is against the rules of society adds a whole new dimension of distraction. As my sexuality bloomed, so did my feelings of insecurity and confusion.” As an adult, Hormel writes: “I had a seething cauldron of sexual energy inside me and couldn’t keep a lid on it.” He paints a vivid picture of the double life he felt forced to live in the early 1960s. On the one hand he had a “picture perfect” married life in Chicago. He was a loving husband to his college sweetheart, a doting father to four children and a successful lawyer who was already being considered as a Republican congressional candidate. He also knew “almost instinctively” which city he could visit to find some kind of furtive sexual relief, which bar or beach or truck stop he could drop by for one of his infrequent but irresistible encounters with men.
“In those days,” Hormel admits, “I might have joked about faggots, or imitated a lisping, limp-wristed fellow to get a few laughs, while going out that same evening to seek an assignation with another man.” He describes the “adrenaline rush” he experienced when he knew that he was “breaking society’s mores,” at the same time living “in constant fear of discovery.” The idea of “coming out” and dealing with the consequences was unthinkable. “No, no, I can’t do this,” he remembers saying to himself. “I cannot risk ruining my life or humiliating my entire family.” And yet as time passed Hormel became less and less able to ignore or sublimate his growing need for same-sex intimacy. “There was no frame of reference to help me figure out what was going on inside my head and my body,” Hormel writes. “There were no resources, no role models. Even Truman Capote, as openly gay as he seemed, always appeared in public with a woman on his arm.” Eventually, Hormel’s conflict became unbearable. Hormel’s ambivalence and anguish were not the result of cowardice or weakness. In the 1960s homosexuality was still a crime (in every state), a “sin” (in the eyes of Catholic and Protestant clergy) and a “sickness” (in the American Psychiatric Association’s “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders”). Mental and physical health professionals were prescribing drug regimens, various aversive therapies and even electric shock to help their patients overcome this “psychological illness,” and “official Washington actively hunted down and fired gay and lesbian civil servants,” Hormel remembers. Although he lost his marriage and his chance to run for Congress, Hormel finally ended those years of ambivalence and guilt. But it wasn’t science or history or the American Psychiatric Association that led to his self-acceptance. It was falling in love with a man, discovering a new family in the gay community and becoming an activist in the gay struggle for civil rights. As a fledgling gay activist, Hormel found himself on the front lines of the war being waged against LGBT people by the religious right. It was a battleground where his inherited wealth, which had embarrassed him early in life, was badly needed. When Hormel realized that his money could be used “to touch people on a broad scale,” he began his public battle to win justice and equality for his LGBT sisters and brothers in the U.S. and abroad. The climax of that struggle was the fierce seven-year battle to become America’s first openly gay ambassador.
New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Arouete, March 18, 2012 at 2:34 am Link to this comment
What is sadly missing from this arguably ghost-written propaganda piece is the source of this philanthropist’s fortune and the ugly labor history of the Hormel meat packing fortune. A fortune that is soaked in the blood, sweat, and tears of one of the most viscous labor struggles in American history – events not mentioned in the book of course. “Whisk, Whisk.” As our Ford said “History is bunk” – unless you have the money to write it your own way.
The real back-story in the history of this privileged one percenter is the source of his money and the meat-packing fortune sucked out of the human suffering that was chillingly portrayed in “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair. In particular the ugly and ruthless Hormel strike of 1985 (a period much chronicled in this book while all facts are totally cleansed) was chronicled in the film “American Dream,” which won the Academy Award for best documentary in 1990. (See Utube.) A song about the strike, entitled “P-9” was written by Dave Pirner of the Minneapolis band Soul Asylum. The song can be found on their 1989 album, “Clam Dip & Other Delights.” Hormel’s fortune and his history is that of the 1% who sucked the 99% dry to make of them Spam. While Jim Hormel lived off that fortune had sat on the Hormel board of directors and this book make no mention of activism on behalf of the exploited labor and the bitter struggle of the Hormel workers.
Of course with that much money one can flit about the chi-chi Gucci planet and experiment in California spiritualism to heart’s content. That Hormel buried this history (whisk, whisk) is a disappointment for what he did with his life is testimony not just to transcending his closeted homosexuality but to the humanitarian use such a misery-soaked fortune can be put to. Oh, well let no one call him a traitor to his class.
As can be expected money can buy just about anything even the softball questions of sycophant reviewers who call themselves journalists.
Report thisBy DarthMiffy, February 20, 2012 at 8:31 pm Link to this comment
Alright then, I call you “old-fashioned”, “rigid”, and “unrealistic”. Not to
Report thismention lacking in empathy. This was a fine bit of writing.
By Michael Cavlan RN, February 18, 2012 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
This is true for Obama apologists only
No, the gay man that truly represents Obama is Bradley Manning.
Someone that the mainstream gay community seem to have ignored completely.
Check out the song Almost Gone by Graham Nash. It is about Obama’s gay representative.
ROCKY ANDERSON FOR PRESIDENT
Report thisBy dannyfree, February 17, 2012 at 4:40 pm Link to this comment
Who Cares! Apparently those who pay attention most to these issues are yoursevles (Truthdig), the rest of the left-wing ‘progressives’ such as The Nation and the “left-liberal” wing of the Democratic Party along with the Ultra-Right (albeit the latter on the most reacionmary homophobic basis.)
“Identity Politics” represents the dead-end straitjacket of capitalist politics which obviates class and political program. Should we celebrate Margaret Thatcher (as the film industry has) because, adter all, she was a woman? Truthdig and its co-thinkers among the “middle-class left”, celebrated Obama’s election as an epochal positive achievment because he is “black” (African American) and now is
“diappointed” because his administration is not only populated by bankers but represents the mega-banks and the likes of Goldman Sachs, the Transnationals Corporate goliaths etc, and in many areas has continued and even deepened the poliicies of the Bush regime.
Call me “old-fashioned”, “rigid”, “unrealistic”, etc. I expect it and respond that it it those of you who thin capitlism as a system can be made to work for progress, a humane non-militaristic society, etc., who are short-sighted"unrealistic”. I have been an international socialist, a Marxist and Trotskyist since 1956. Although I speak only for myself and not as a representative of any group or organization, I strongly recommend the World Socialist Website, http://www.wsws.org and the just announced 2012 U.S. Presidential election campaign of Jerome White and Phyllis Scherrer by the Socialist Equality Party (U.S.)
dannyfree
Report thisD.F., New York, New York