|
|||
|
‘The Tillman Story’: Myth, Mystery and CelebrityPosted on Aug 19, 2010
We pretty much know all we are likely to know about Pat Tillman. And anything we might still like to know about his story we are, I think, unlikely to discover in the future. That said, however, Amir Bar-Lev’s documentary, “The Tillman Story,” adds coherence, welcome visual detail and some telling, occasionally poignant, moments to a well-rehearsed narrative. Tillman, as we all know, was the Arizona Cardinals’ outstanding defensive back who abruptly quit the team (and rejected a potential multimillion-dollar contract) to enlist in the Army in 2002, less than a year after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. On April 22, 2004, he was killed in the mountains of Afghanistan. The Army, aided and abetted by the Bush administration, pretended that his was a heroic combat death and hastily awarded him a posthumous Silver Star. It soon emerged, however, that he was killed by friendly (or as everyone connected with the case prefers, “fratricidal”) fire. Bar-Lev’s film is very good at recounting the details of Tillman’s final moments. His unit was split in two in order to traverse a narrow canyon. Tillman, a corporal, was in the first unit, which became engaged in a fire fight with enemy troops. When the second group of American soldiers arrived, they enthusiastically joined the battle, with some eyewitnesses contending they were mainly looking for bragging rights—“Hey, look at me, I was in combat”—and Tillman, who was too far away to be heard or identified, became their victim. Since Tillman was the Army’s sole celebrity soldier, this terrible though relatively common accident (the fog of war and all that) could be converted into a solemn and uplifting patriotic occasion. It was Tillman’s family that thwarted this ambition. Something just seemed fishy about the story, and once they dug through thousands of heavily redacted interviews and the hearing transcripts the Army was obliged to supply them, they knew they were right. At a certain level, what was meant to be an inspiring tale of one sort turned into one of quite a different kind—a populist challenge to official prevarication on a quite spectacular level. One of the grim delights of this film is footage of a congressional hearing at which a row of general officers, accompanied by Donald (“Stuff Happens”) Rumsfeld, suffers an epidemic loss of memory about who knew what when as this matter unfolded. The film works reasonably well as a sort of real-life Frank Capra story, even though it lacks an inspiring ending and, alas, a Mr. Smith or Mr. Deeds or Mr. Doe. We don’t get a firm sense of who Pat Tillman really was or what forces drove him toward his fate. He was the product of a well-educated, middle-class family with a gift for organized sports and disorganized boyhood derring-do that somewhat exceeded the norm. He was small for high-level football but compensated with a hell-for-leather style. The film offers ample evidence that when he hit you, you stayed hit. Withal—and this is not as uncommon in the jock world as some people think—he was an avid reader, intent on developing his own ideas about a wide range of topics. He read the standard authors—Emerson and his ilk—but also figures like Noam Chomsky, whom he hoped to meet when he completed his tour of duty. More interestingly, he was irreligious, which takes some doing in the sports world, where everybody is always dropping to his knees to thank God for winning a game. At his memorial service, his brother Rich said: “Pat isn’t with God. He’s fucking dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s fucking dead.” Which means that we can rule out conventional piety as a motivating force for Tillman. It also means—for me at least—that he deserves another Silver Star for resisting the torrent of twaddle endlessly bathing our public life. That, however, leaves us with that other charlatan-refuge—patriotism—as his driving force. But that doesn’t quite wash, either. The film records no recollections of flag-waving speeches by him, though dispassionate references to 9/11 are made. They seem to me no more than something you might say in lieu of having nothing to say. I am left with the thought that it may have been a rather simple sort of ambition that moved him. I’m OK with that, despite the fact that it is the sin that dares not speak its name in America. It seems to me that what Tillman may have had in mind was a political career: You build on your football fame, then ostentatiously turn your back on it for military service, maybe come back and play a few more years, then take up a more than usually altruistic political life. Of course, he would have had to give up his taste for cuss words and somehow finesse his lack of piety, but there are plenty of precedents for that in our public life. In any case, it is an imputation that Tillman’s silence leaves us free to make. In his final moments on that Afghan hillside, Pat Tillman was heard to cry out, more than once, “I’m Pat Fucking Tillman.” As if his fame might somehow protect him and his men from the wild-flying bullets. It made sense; the troops knew who he was and admired him. Surely if they knew a celebrity was in their line of fire they would cease and desist. But, of course, he went unheard. And so he died, his head literally separated from his body, his blood pouring down the hill. Thanks to the Establishment’s truly spectacular mishandling of this case—will they never learn, you can live with screw-ups, never coverups?—Pat Tillman left the country of celebrity and entered the land of myth, innocently, even perhaps tragically, proving that fame, despite its many magical qualities, is not always a reliable form of self-protection. We are reminded, almost daily, that it attracts envy and malevolence. We are reminded, by this case, that in the Godless universe Pat Tillman believed he inhabited, it is no armor at all against the all-conquering fog of mischance that surrounds all of us every day. Richard Schickel, whose celebrated and prolific career spans 50 years, has been the film critic for Time and Life magazines, has written more than 20 books and has produced, written and directed numerous documentaries. Related on Truthdig
Advertisement Previous item: Jean in 'Hiding' While Awaiting Presidential Run Next item: Norman Podhoretz in Black and White CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By PatrickHenry, November 21, 2011 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment
Tillmans death was just another example of the panoply of lies our media and our military serve to us every day on a platter of our tax dollars.
Report thisBy Calabashe, November 21, 2011 at 7:42 am Link to this comment
That Pat’s death was more than an accident? You’re preaching to the crowd here.
That Pat would have become a public war protester? I say that’s part of the mythos the family wanted to dispel.
That Rumsfeld would have been paranoid about that? No doubt!
Report thisBy BR549, November 21, 2011 at 5:45 am Link to this comment
drbhelthi, November 21 at 1:25 am”
“A burst of three rounds to the forehead, within a three inch pattern, explains the motive of the event to persons with experience in the area.”
That “burst of three rounds”, as you appear to well know, is classic with the newer M4 (S-1-3) designation in that it keeps trigger happy yahoos from prematurely blowing off their whole ammunition wad in an undisciplined manner. The three round burst was put into the newer models to limit the muzzle climb when operating under full-auto, or S-1-F.
That “3 rounds” to the head, also, was no doubt close up and intentional, since the spread of that tight group would have likely been much greater with any distance, and the fact that it was a forehead shot suggests that the shooter had to have seen the face of the man he was shooting at.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, November 21, 2011 at 5:42 am Link to this comment
@Calabashe
Knowing the man would contribute to the impressions and opinions of him by his acquaintances. My statements are based on the facts of his murder, the subsequent USARMY and political maneuvers related with the event, which are available without having had personal contact with him. I am impressed by his patriotic behavior.
Report thisBy Calabashe, November 21, 2011 at 5:23 am Link to this comment
One’s guess might be considered educated if one actually knew the man. As I understand, Pat intended to return to the NFL.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, November 21, 2011 at 12:25 am Link to this comment
@ Calabashe
Speculation is speculation, whether from others or from Calabashe.
A burst of three rounds to the forehead, within a three inch pattern, explains the motive of the event to persons with experience in the area. In the past, spooks who committed such murders publicized “who dunnit” only after they became Whistle-Blowers, if ever. http://www.whale.to/b/tatum.pdf
We noticed that the theatre-level, soldier puppets of the plot scape-goated their underling, a one-star general, while they received promotions. The elected and appointed civilian component of the treasonous act became un-elected or went into quasi-hiding within the US, at the expense of American Tax-Payers. Since the NFL is owned by these criminal-types, one does not expect the NFL leadership to join the OWS movement.
Report thisBy Calabashe, November 19, 2011 at 9:00 am Link to this comment
That Pat. “... was about to expose what was
going on over there for all to see ... ” is pure speculation.
As I understand he intended to return to the NFL, finish his Masters in History and raise babies with Marie. The NFL is very “A” political and would not have been amused if Pat became a public protester.
Report thisBy mapol, November 19, 2011 at 7:50 am Link to this comment
Right on Hammond Eggs!
This:
“The Tillman story is truly symbolic of how utterly and thoroughly rotten and
corrupt the United States government and military truly are.”
says it all, in a nutshell. It was obvious from day one that Pat Tillman’s death
Report thiswas no accident, but a cold-blooded murder at the hands of somebody on our
side who wanted him out of the way, because he was about to expose what was
going on over there for all to see, which would’ve been better, because we
might not be fighting a whole bunch of other stupid, illegal, useless and
wrongheaded wars right now if Pat Tillman had gotten the chance to expose the
truth.
By drbhelthi, August 24, 2010 at 2:23 am Link to this comment
Ah, yes. The “Junior” Bush oligarchy.
Newsmax reports that “Junior” is trying to run out in
front of the “Tea Party” entourage, in order to
shout, “Follow Me ! “
We would do well to send him back to Brownsville,
for continuation of the investigation of the 1984
murders and skinning of the “brothers & sisters” of
the cult he was a member of. He disappeared for
three days and could not remember what happened.
Right.
Meanwhile, a house full of murdered and skinned bodies
was discovered. Must have been a 3-day,
human-slaughterhouse event. Would take an exceptional
murderer to have done this alone - - !
Even in three days.
Having a 3-shot burst placed in a genuine Patriot´s
forehead would be nothing for such a derelict.
I wonder if “Junior” remembers the names of his flight
supervisors, who did not sign off on his required
efficiency checks, and who “died” before they could
give certification of non-flight status ???
Someone would do well to check out the “Bush
Library”, looking for lamps with shades made of
human skin, vogue among NAZIs, 1944-1950.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard
Report this.php?az=view_all&address=364x2065897
By Calabashe, August 23, 2010 at 10:25 am Link to this comment
A couple of weeks ago, I offered to his Mom, Mary, how surreal Hero Dude has become. It is so easy for those who want to admire Pat to often insert opinions, interpretations and perceptions that make good copy but have little to do with the man I was privileged to call friend.
Take the Krakauer book for example. If one never met Pat one might think it a literary masterpiece capturing the essence of a true hero. Yet if one actually knew or even met the man (Pat) one would see “Glory” for what it is: a shallow caricature that earned the author another (undeserved) best seller. The family does not endorse Krakauer’s fairytale.
BTW, Mr Schikel, Pat died as a Specialist. Corporal was awarded posthumously. A future career in politics? Where did that come from?
As I understand, the family was reluctant to participate in another possible fantasy like a glammed up epic with Max von Sydow walking on water. To Pat’s widow Marie’s credit, she convinced the family that if there wasn’t another attempt to tell the story it would fall into public domain. Such versions out there had Pat, on 9/11, smashing furniture and riding off on a fictitious Harley or with Pat Sr. leading the family in prayer.
To understand “The Tillman Story,” one must understand this is not a story about Pat. His unique ego would never allow that. It is a story about the deception and disrespect that seems to have been Army SOP.
Haven’t seen the film yet but indications are that this time around Marie scored a touchdown by going with Amir Bar-Lev. This seems to be the story Pat would want told in the way it should be told.
Report thisBy ofersince72, August 22, 2010 at 11:27 am Link to this comment
And while we are on the subject character assasssinations
I want to share this, I plan to get the article and
Report thissend it TD, I haven’t read it yet, plan to this week, but
my ex-wife told me this. She asked not to say anything
until I read the article, but I trust her , and will tell
what she read,
The article was about Mark Twain, and the newly published
work of his that is coming out this fall.
I was under the impression that this 1000 pages of
previously unpublished work was with Twain’s permission
after the 100th birthday of his death. Apparently, that
isn’t the case at all. He gave them to his closest
confidant and said that he never, ever , wanted these
papers published. So I guess what I am suppossed to
infer from this, is that the copywrites have expired and
his estate had no say so over this.
Does anyone know anything on this???
By ofersince72, August 22, 2010 at 11:14 am Link to this comment
And Pat had (and brother) such a bad report card on
the WAR ON TERROR , that the family thought they would
use PAT’S good name in a postive manner for our country.
And thought they would get hold of Chomsky.
Report thisBy ofersince72, August 22, 2010 at 11:05 am Link to this comment
I know that have posted this before, but this seems like
the appropiate thread to post this little tribute I wrote
while watching the hearings,
I hope that it gets to brother. He came accross so well
and we need more like him and if Pat was anything like
like his brother, we had a gigantic loss to our country.
PAT TILLMAN is still my HERO
No matter how he DIED
If it weren’t for these DAMNED resource WARS,
today, he would still be ALIVE.
They would like us to FORGET him,
Report thisLike his story didn’t EXIST.
But I will never FORGET him,
and continue to RESIST ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
By ofersince72, August 22, 2010 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
Who knows, I listened to the Waxman hearings when
they were live. What I got out of Pat’s brother’s
testimony, was that their mother was somewhat of a
Pacifist and had asked her sons to join for the purpose
to check the integrity of the War on Terror..
Report thisI believe that the Tillman family, in order to get
some kind of closure, had to compromise somewhat with
the military because you don’t see all the same rhetoric.
I haven’t gone into the C-Span archives, but who knows,
much of those Waxman hearings may be edited by now.
I watched everybit of it live and I know what I heard.
By BR549, August 22, 2010 at 7:33 am Link to this comment
Money is Funny,
If you ever really had a cause to believe in, which I doubt, you might have understood what Mike Friebel was getting at. I too had that same realization and within the same era, although I chose to bail at the first chance.
The military prides itself on discipline, efficiency, and integrity, except when you get out into the “real” trenches, those who initiate the myriad of stupid orders are just hoping the average grunt doesn’t wake up enough to save his own life before he unwittingly offers it to save one of David Rockefeller’s
investments.
I had joined because I had been convinced of the “Communist Threat”, but what I didn’t understand was why all those Vietnamese were so willing to join up to combat the spread of US imperialism. We reap what we sow, but the likes of Bush and Cheney hope to God you never figure that out.
As for Tillman, he joined admirably but then his conscience led him to the truth. If all of our guys over their had the brains that Tillman did, somewhere along the line, they’d figure out what was really happening and start refusing orders. I did in ‘71 and wound up with my CO eventually standing behind me.
Report thisBy ofersince72, August 22, 2010 at 5:50 am Link to this comment
Delete the word “would” and insert “is”
Report thisBy Money is funny, August 22, 2010 at 1:19 am Link to this comment
Hey,
When they come home let’s spit on them and call them murderers like we did last time. Let’s tell them that they are murderers and slap them in the face with a fish.
The whole world would point their finger at us for being lunatics and they would be right.
Report thisBy Muruh, August 21, 2010 at 11:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Pat was not waiting a rose followers in the battle field and he was well aware for that.Milatary chain of command they done their job well by any means.
Report thisFamily accepted the publicity their son got at that time.why you cry for nothing for now.war is a war either you kill or be killed both ways are same.
remember it’s not your job to declare a war or sign a peace that is the job of commander in chief weather you liked or not and that’s why the American people they elected G.W.Bush twice at the office and he left a legacey safe America.
By Mike Friebel, August 21, 2010 at 11:01 pm Link to this comment
“He volunteered to go somewhere he, and many others did not belong, put himself in harms way and, just because he was a jock his “legacy” somehow lives on. What a bunch of crap. Sorry, but I question the intelligence and motives of all those who signed on for Bush’s mercenary rich wars.”
mrFreeze, keep in mind that Pat was relatively young and his worldview, values, and understanding of the Iraq War were almost certainly still developing. I speak from personal experience. I’m a veteran and service academy graduate and my doubt regarding the value of military service developed through a gradual process that spanned the age at which Pat died. Also keep in mind that what seems so clear to you will be less so or even unimaginable for others with differing experiences and knowledge, and/or who come from a different environment or developmental context. As for me, I was raised to believe, like many, that patriotism and military service were unequivocal goods. This was a given when I entered the military at 18. Not a question entered my mind for a long while. It took certain experiences, much learning and consideration, and quite some time for my skepticism to grow and my perspective to change to the point that I left the military despite being halfway to retirement and joined IVAW. In any case, we don’t really know Pat’s thoughts and intentions, or how they may have been changing, and he was obviously a very inquisitive & thoughtful person, so I would be hesitant to indict him as you do.
Also, Pat’s legacy doesn’t result from him being a jock. Rather, it arises from the drama and mystery of his death combined with the uniquely selfless decision he made that eventually led to it.
Report thisBy Mike, August 21, 2010 at 7:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“He volunteered to go somewhere he, and many others did not belong, put himself in harms way and, just because he was a jock his “legacy” somehow lives on. What a bunch of crap.
Sorry, but I question the intelligence and motives of all those who signed on for Bush’s mercenary rich wars.”
mrFreeze, keep in mind that Pat was relatively young and his worldview, values, and understanding of the Iraq War were certainly still developing. I speak from personal experience. I’m a veteran and service academy graduate and my doubt regarding the value of military service developed through a gradual process that spanned the age at which Pat died. Also keep in mind that what seems so clear to you will be less so or even unimaginable for others with differing experiences and knowledges, and/or who come from a different environment or developmental context. As for me, I was raised to believe, like many, that patriotism and military service were unequivocal goods. This was a given when I entered the military. Not a question entered my mind for a long while. It took certain experiences, much learning and consideration, and quite some time for my skepticism to grow and my perspective to change to the point that I left the military despite being halfway to retirement and joined IVAW. In any case, we don’t really know Pat’s thoughts and intentions, or how they may have been changing, and he was obviously a very inquisitive person, so I would be hesitant to indict him as you do.
BTW, Pat’s legacy doesn’t result from him being a jock. Rather, it arises from the drama and mystery of his death and the unusually selfless decision he made to leave behind a promising career and such wealth and fame for certain danger as an enlistee in the Army Rangers.
Report thisBy Carl, August 21, 2010 at 5:05 pm Link to this comment
Here is more, from the Army Times.
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/07/ap_tillman_070727/
Report: Tillman doc was suspicious of wounds
By Martha Mendoza - The Associated Press
Posted : Sunday Jul 29, 2007 10:17:47 EDT
SAN FRANCISCO — Army medical examiners were suspicious about the close proximity of the three bullet holes in Pat Tillman’s forehead and tried without success to get authorities to investigate whether the former professional football player’s death amounted to a crime, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.
“The medical evidence did not match up with the, with the scenario as described,” a doctor who examined Tillman’s body after he was killed on the battlefield in Afghanistan in 2004 told investigators.
The doctors — whose names were blacked out — said the bullet holes were so close together that it appeared the Army Ranger was cut down by an M16 fired from a mere 10 yards or so away.”
“It has been widely reported by AP and others that Spc. Bryan O’Neal, who was at Tillman’s side as he was killed, told investigators that Tillman was waving his arms shouting “Cease fire, friendlies, I am Pat (expletive) Tillman, damn it!” again and again.”
——————————————
So Tillman was shouting “cease fire” many times, yet one Ranger, who has never been named or interviewed, carefully aimed and shot him four times from 10 yards away, with three shots to the forehead. Did anyone else interview the doctors? I doubt it, the Army report blacked out their names.
Witnesses? If anyone saw Tillman gunned down, they know to keep quiet, lest the suffer from an accident too.
Report thisBy Guy Montag, August 21, 2010 at 3:07 pm Link to this comment
What a review!
You would think the reviewer would have at least down a bit of research on the Tillman story before writing his review. At least he could have picked up Mary Tillman’s book “Boots on the Ground by Dusk” (available at blurb.com with a new foreword)or Jon Krakauer’s “Where Men Win Glory” (paperback edition now out, about 50 more pages on McChrystal and the Army’s cover-up).
I couldn’t believe this guy’s speculating that Pat was setting himself up for a political career. Pat Tillman was driven by a core of integrity. He did wht he thought was right, regardless of the consequences.
The New York Times, on the other hand, just carrys water for the powers that be. in “Lies Borne Out by Facts, If Not the Truth” I detail my personal encounter with the their pentagon reporter Thom Shanker who “exonerated” McChrystal of all wrong-doing.
...
In his “The Fog of War” interview with Jason Guerrasio, Amir Bar-Lev, the director of “The Tillman Story,” said: “… there’s been no culpability on the second half of this tragedy, which is the higher ups trying to cover it up. … to borrow a football metaphor, they [the Tillman family] ran the ball 99 yards over four years time, they handed it off at the one-yard line to Congress and they fumbled it….”
Shortly after Sundance, Bar-Lev emailed me that “he was pretty hard on the Democratic Congress in his film.” True, his film does portray Congressman Waxman’s Oversight Committee as ineptly failing to get answers from the top military leadership during their hearing.
However, Bar-Lev’s film missed the ”untold story” that both the Democratic Congress and the Obama Presidency have intentionally protected General Stanley McChrystal from scrutiny and punishment for his central role in the cover-up of Pat Tillman’s friendly-fire death. This cover-up was a thoroughly bi-partisan affair. It wasn’t just a case of the Bush administration and the Army stonewalling the Democratic Congress. Congress didn’t just “fumble” the ball, they threw the game.
Five years ago, Pat Tillman’s family were handed a tarnished Silver Star. It was a travesty of justice that President Obama and the Senate promoted General McChrystal to the Army’s highest rank, and handed him his fourth star.
It’s not surprising that after their initial cover-up of Pat Tillman’s friendly-fire death fell apart, Army officers and the Bush administration lied to protect their careers. But after they took control of both Houses of Congress in 2006, the Democrats (including Congressman Waxman, Senator Levin, Senator Webb, and Senator McCain) could have gone after those responsible. Or at least not promoted them twice!
Just before the 2006 mid-term elections, Kevin Tillman published his eloquent letter, “After Pat’s Birthday”. Kevin had hoped a Democratic Congress would bring accountability back to our country. But, just as with warrantless wiretapping and torture, those responsible for the cover-up of his brother’s friendly-fire death have never been held accountable for their actions.
Last week, I posted “The [Untold] Tillman Story” – President Obama and the Bi-Partisan Congressional Whitewash of General Stanley McChrystal’s Cover-up of Pat Tillman’s Friendly-Fire Death, at http://www.feralfirefighter.blogspot.com and scribd.com
Report thisBy Jared, August 21, 2010 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Richard Schickel’s review of “The Tillman Story” is a disgraceful insult to Pat’s family and everyone who values truth. Based on his comments it appears he is not been brought up to speed with the events surrounding Tillmans death. This looks like something that would have been written around 2005,
the disinfo is way out of date and most have learned a great deal more since then. I was shocked to read this review and see the date of 08/19/2010! Did this guy actually watch the film he reviewed? Maybe the volume was turned down or he got the japanese version or something.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But it’s interesting that this article appears on one of the a so-called “alternative press” websites that is supposed to bring us an alternative viewpoint from MSM, and hum I don’t know, maybe actual real news.
Congratulations Scheerer, your “news” agency is now perfectly aligned with the talking heads of corporate mainstream media. Promoting to the American people, government propaganda and disinformation. The lack of responsibility in journalism appears to be contagious and growing.
Report this“TRUTH-DIG”, huh?
By Burt, August 21, 2010 at 2:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Read “Where Men win Glory” by ,is it Sebastian Junger(?)or Jon Krakauer I get those two mixed up.
Report thisAny way I think that book answers many questions. I was a college scholarship athlete in ‘65, ‘66, 67. and I felt guilt that, altho I knew Vietnam to be a travesty, my cohorts were in the meat grinder. I thought at least I could be a medic. My friend who had just come back told me I was insane. I went into the Peace corps
By cheap hotels, August 21, 2010 at 1:59 pm Link to this comment
how you can think this work will b done by osama and muslims may b this wil b done by israel and USA or india also
Report thistell me
USA and israel doing war in iraq kill many peoples
israel kill many muslims in pahlisten
usa kill many peoples in afgahnistan
now tell me which was made taliban and alqaida usa or muslims then how muslims are terrorist USA and israel terorist and now in USA isreal hold hole USA Not USA
cheap hotels
By BR549, August 21, 2010 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment
Carl,
Nice piece .......
Report thisBy Carl, August 21, 2010 at 11:39 am Link to this comment
Where did the “rumor” that Tillman was murdered come from? The Army doctors who examined his body reported that Tillman was shot at close range, one bullet at a time, and demanded an investigation. Their CO refused, so they risked their careers by going over his head and contacted a General back at Benning. These were combat experienced Army doctors who saw hundreds of bullet wounds over there.
The friendly fire claim was that a burst from an light machine gun killed Tillman. However, a machine gun jerks with every bullet fired, as does a man when hit. Where was Tillman hit? Three bullet holes neatly in the forehead quite close together, a perfect “grouping.”
As you know, many of our “elite” special forces are far right wing fanatics, and one may have viewed Tillman as a traitor who spoke his mind, opposed the war, hated Bush, and was about to embarrass the Army and the Rangers. It is not unreasonable that some nut shot Tillman at close range with an rifle, then tossed it aside before anyone else got there. Even if others knew, everyone would rally to cover this up, including the Generals.
So what happened to the doctor’s demand for an investigation? Nothing.
A similar scandal may soon blow up here in Las Vegas. Three cops gunned down a guy at Costco who had a pistol, who was a good citizen and a West Point grad. The police claim that he pointed a gun at them, yet they refuse to release the Costco security video to prove it. Like with Tillman, authorities just angrily insist that citizens must trust them, so shut up and do what your told. Challenging their integrity is unpatriotic, no matter what facts arise.
So all you “extremists” just forget about what you’ve just read. Move on, nothing to see here.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, August 21, 2010 at 10:03 am Link to this comment
Some folk who blog to Truthdig are acquainted with
Rangers, other special forces, and perhaps additional
types.
Regardless of ones experiences, he for whom it is
“totally unfathomable” that Pat Tillman was
assassinated, short-circuits ones insight and
comprehension.
One is a bit naive to even think that such an order
Report thiswould dribble down the chain of command.
By Aradia Farmer, August 21, 2010 at 9:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Jon Krakaur did a much better story of Tillman’s life
Report thisand motivations than this article. He doesn’t bother
with the right or wrong of Tillman’s choices, but
rather with the inner workings of his mind. He delves
into journals Tillman kept, conversations he had with
his wife and brother (who is named Kevin, not Rick) and
team mates, interviews the men he was with that day and
those that “helped” in the subsequent investigations
that turned up nothing but confusion. If you want to
get a clearer picture than what is presented above,
read Where Men Win Glory.
By Spooky-43, August 21, 2010 at 1:41 am Link to this comment
Professional soldiers know how to go about assasinating one of their own ranks. It is extremeley rare in the Special Ops teams, as these men become extremely close. Most common instances occur as a result of the hatred of a superior officer.
If ordered from above, (something I have never heard about, rumors or otherwise) only the executioner would have the order, obviously, and would not do it in front of witnesses who might breakdown later.
Think about how hard it would be to pass that order down the chain of command to the common grunts in the field. Especially ones who are as tight as brothers. If you think that could happen, you understand nothing of the blood bonds these special forces types share.
It would have been much easier to discredit Tillman and discharge him than taking the chance of conspiring to murder him. Simply not worth the effort or the risk.
It would never be done with a handgun, as these are personal, traceable weapons. The favored weapon is a fragmentation grenade, preferably the enemy’s.
I read all these posts, and I can’t help thinking that the posters do not realize that the Rangers are among the best trained troops we have out there. If Pat Tillman had to die, for some reason, which is really totally unfathomable, (after all, he wasn’t saying anything thousands of others weren’t saying, and you really overestimate his fame and political value) it would have been done in a much more professional manner, not with a handgun.
Report thisBy LocalHero, August 20, 2010 at 8:29 pm Link to this comment
Well said Jimnp72.
No man who volunteers to pick up a weapon, travel to the other side of the world and kill people he’s never met and has no grievance with is no “hero.”
In sane circles they call those people murderers.
Report thisBy Orwellian, August 20, 2010 at 4:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The note of bored pomposity in this review is not worthy of Truthdig or of Pat Tillman. The reviewer sounds as if he is too “celebrated” and too “prolific” to respond to the life of a genuine hero. After all, he tells us, this is merely the case of the Establishment “mishandling” an accident in the “fog of mischance.” So of course there is no villain in the story.
There is something petty and mean about responding to tragedy with ennui. Do we need a reviewer who is so bored with his job that he has to tell us in the first paragraph that we (meaning “he”) knows all about Pat Tillman and all we can hope for is some occasionally poignant moments in a “well-rehearsed” narrative?
He does seem to enjoy sharing his thought that Tillman was just an ambitious would-be politician with a plan to dump the army and run for office, who was so egotistical that he called out that he was “Pat fucking Tillman” at the killers, in the fond hope that his celebrity would protect him.
This is a nascent swiftboating.
The reviewer seems to miss the detail that Tillman’s unit had been divided in two and the people he was calling out to were members of his own unit not a crowd of autograph seekers.
The reviewer is perhaps revealing his own twisted values when he sums up that Tillman’s death proved that “fame is not always a reliable form of self-protection.” The only evidence that anybody holds such an absurd notion is that the prolific and celebrated reviewer fashioned an essay around it.
Why does Richard Schickle have such contempt for Pat Tillman? Is it because Tillman “believed that he lived in a Godless universe” where he thought that “fame” was the “armor” that God is for others? Apparently in Schickelthink atheists huddling in their foxholes are thinking that nobody can shoot them if they are famous enough.
Report thisWhat rot.
By PatrickHenry, August 20, 2010 at 4:26 pm Link to this comment
Jimnp72, yes heroism takes many forms, seeking to kill some poor smucks living in caves on the other side of the world doesn’t make me think hero as it does mercenary.
Report thisBy Mike, August 20, 2010 at 2:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
mrfreeze: In regard to the nature of Pat’s judgment to enlist, keep in mind that he was a young man. It is certain that his view of the world and his values continued to develop, especially considering his inquisitive nature. His initial inspiration and beliefs regarding the war may have evolved in time. I do speak from personal experience. I am a veteran and service academy graduate and my beliefs and values regarding military action and service evolved significantly relative to what they were when I first entered the military. Also keep in mind that our beliefs and values are products of our specific upbringing and experiences. The enlightenment you have found may not be so easily within reach of others. Beware of your actor-observer bias.
Report thisBy Dale Headley, August 20, 2010 at 1:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is this supposed to be big news - the fact that the Bush Administration
Report thisdeliberately LIED to the American people? Actually, this was just another typical
day - another strategic “lie of the day” - that was the core principle of the 8 years
of the Bush Administration. From “Iraq is only 45 minutes from being able to
launch a massive attack against the United States,” to “We don’t torture!” George
Bush and his allies at “Fox News” used the “big lie” strategy almost every day.
Why? because it worked! Americans, especially when you throw “patriotism” in
their faces, will believe almost anything. So covering up the circumstances
surrounding Pat Tillman’s death was just another day in the Bush White House.
By Sam Leff, August 20, 2010 at 12:57 pm Link to this comment
Truth Dig?? Richard Schickel’s review is worse than superficial. It smears the authentic motivations of a heroic, if misguided, patriot. It is unbelievably blind to the worse-than-Goebbels media manipulation of the desperate Bush administration, the-worse- than- cynical manipulation that used national television to pervert and distort the meaning of Tillman’s death. This is the worst documentary film review [of a subject I know well] I have ever read.
Alive, in the spring of 2004, football hero turned post-9/11 warrior, Pat Tillman, was a serious threat to Bush’s precarious candidacy. Karl Rove’s big ears must have heard of Tillman’s antiwar evolution. He must have known he was supporting John Kerry and talking about campaigning against George Bush in the 2004 election. He must have heard about his proposed meeting with Noam Chomsky and that he was telling his fellow Rangers to vote against George Bush. Tillman was a political and policy threat with boots on the ground, who came to the conclusion that the war the US was fighting in Iraq was purposeless and illegal. He was emerging as a famous, unusually articulate, well read jock with a serious political awareness.
Cold dead he could be used as a hot propaganda tool for Bush and his wars. Tillman was a super patriotic football hero who forfeited a $3 million pro football contract to join the Army Rangers to fight the perpetrators of 9/11. If he could also be made into a war hero and a Jessica Lynch like story could be re-created for him, he could be made into the poster boy he refused to be when he was alive.
There were suspicious, incriminating, postmortem aspects to Tillman’s death. After he died, his body armor disappeared the next day. His uniform was burned the second day. Perhaps most significantly, his careful diary disappeared, a diary that would have surely recorded his disappointments and opposition to the Iraq war and George Bush. The diary would have been an incriminating refutation of any Bush campaign mythmaking, capitalizing on his death and unique-football-hero-gone military warrior heroism.
According to his father, “The administration clearly was using this case for its own political reasons. This cover-up started within minutes of Pat’s death, and it started at high levels.”
” Just last year, McChrystal was still lying about Tillman’s case,” says Tillman’s mother, who remains furious the military and the Bush Administration used her family as props in a nationally televised Silver Star ceremony and funeral that military leaders, including McChrystal, and Bush Administration officials knew was a fraud: “If the Army chain of command didn’t know what happened to Pat, why did it present us with a false story at the memorial service?” Tillman asked. “That is not an error; that is not a misstep; that is deliberate deception. McCain was at Pat’s service. He was read a false narrative like the rest of us. Where is his outrage? Did he know all along?”
Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal told the Senate Armed Services Committee that he helped expedite the Silver Star award for Tillman before confirming that the Army corporal was killed by friendly fire in 2004.
McChrystal acknowledged the problem, calling it a mistake. He said the Silver Star citation was “not well-written” but denied any intent to mislead….
Mary Tillman said McChrystal knew at the memorial service that her son died from friendly fire.
“McChrystal was lying,” she said, “He said he didn’t know for certain Pat was killed by fratricide. That isn’t true in and of itself, but the fact is, it doesn’t matter whether he knew it for certain.
Army protocol at the time required families to be told of possible fratricide, whether or not it had been confirmed,” ….
Report thisThe supreme irony of all this today is that this disgraced chronic liar has just been appointed to a teaching post at Yale University.
By Jimnp72, August 20, 2010 at 12:54 pm Link to this comment
yeah big square jawed jock macho man ready to go over and kill.
Report thisSo weird the way some people frame heroic behavior
my heros labor tirelessly to help the poor and downtrodden, with little or no pay.
they vol in soup kitchens and organize neighborhood gardens and youth groups in
the inner city, often putting their lives at risk as well. they are rarely recognized or
thanked for all they do, nor do they boast and pose for photo ops.
they dont carry their heroism about so others can see, as the heroism is in what
they do.
By ofersince72, August 20, 2010 at 9:27 am Link to this comment
In the congressional testimony, I believe Pat’s
brother inferred that their mother urged them both
to enlist because she was curious about the War on Terror.
I am sure that is what I heard.
I believe Pat knew he was going to die that day.
Report thisthus the “I’m fucking Pat Tillman”.
Since they have lied and covered up, I can believe
anything I want.
I bet they had a gun on him from the time he woke
up that morning, told him we are driving to mountains
and guess what, you’re it.
He wasn’t the “hero” that they portrayed him to be
in the media. He was questioning. It was getting
embarassing to the government because of all the media
hype that they put into his enlistment. He had to go.
By BR549, August 20, 2010 at 8:53 am Link to this comment
Tropicgirl,
Fratricide has been somewhat differentiated between friendly fire in that the
latter suggests it’s being unintentional. Technically, though, fratricide covers
both.
Case in point: “Fratricide” from Wiktionary
(murder) homicide
(murder of father) patricide
(murder of king) regicide
(military) friendly fire
Notice the intentionality for all uses of the term except for the military.
Report thisHmmm.
It’s as if whoever wrote this definition couldn’t fathom the possibility of
intentionally shooting one’s own troops. That last definition should have read:
(murder of fellow troops) as opposed to accidental ‘friendly fire’
By Steve, August 20, 2010 at 8:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
On his atheism, you say “Which means that we can rule
out conventional piety as a motivating force for
Tillman.”
This boggles my mind- someone who is not religious
cannot have a sense of justice, goodwill, or concern
towards their fellow man?
And if by ‘piety’ you strictly mean in a religious
Report thissense (since there are different definitions for the
word), there are still those other values that could
compel someone to do what he did. I think those make
far more sense than some overreaching plot for a
future political career (even if they might have been
eventually in the cards for him.)
By tropicgirl, August 20, 2010 at 8:39 am Link to this comment
I think “fratricide” is being used on purpose here.
Imagine believing the hype and going over there, as a respectable person, and
finding a drug-running operation, done by our guys and girls. Profits to world
entitles and banks.
I can’t imagine what he went through. No “friendly fire” though.
Report thisBy BR549, August 20, 2010 at 8:39 am Link to this comment
Camnai,
That’s the problem with the internet; sometimes it’s hard to tell when people might even be in the same camp.
Thanks for the explanation.
Tillman may or may not have been trying to inform others about what was really happening over there. If there is any truth to that, it would be enough for me to still see him as a hero. Even more so, if his death was fratricide, he still died by enemy fire, even though that enemy may not have been wearing a turban. Our enemies in Congress do the best they can to hide amongst the population, all the while condemning civilian Afghani and Palestinian terrorists of doing the same ...... the pot calling the kettle black.
Report thisBy Martha, August 20, 2010 at 8:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This was a horrid review of this documentary. Mr. Schickel made assumptions and
judgements about Pat Tillman that have no basis in fact. This story is not about
what Pat might have done after the military. This story is not about Pat’s motives
for his decisions. This story is about the malfeasance of the government. The P4
memo urges the president to watch what he says about Pat Tillman’s death so that
he wouldn’t be caught saying something wrong IF (not when but IF) the truth came
out about Pat’s death at the hands of his fellow soldiers. This is a story not about
mistakes but full out deliberate falsification, lies and coverups of the truth.
This is a story that could be about you and your son or daughter. Aside from this
Report thisreview, this is a must see documentary.
By camnai, August 20, 2010 at 7:26 am Link to this comment
I’m sorry, BR549, but what difference are we talking about? I was trying to say that
someone who does something heroic in order to spin a political career out of it is
still a hero, and wanting to be a politician is not necessarily a sign that you are an
evil person.
However, I will say that, while Tillman was undoubtedly brave, perhaps to be a
true ‘hero’ one must actually accomplish something, and he didn’t get a chance
to. His major accomplishment, sadly, came after his death when the White House
and Pentagon shot themselves in the feet trying to make him a hero.
And a number of politicians have put themselves in harm’s way before; John Kerry
Report thiscomes to mind, and a fat lot of good that did him with that group of Americans
who so love to fetishize the military.
By BR549, August 20, 2010 at 6:58 am Link to this comment
Canmai,
The difference here is that Tillman was willing to put himself in harm’s way.
Unlike our overabundance of armchair warrior politicians, Tillman would have
at least been walking his talk, although I’m not really convinced that he would
have had any political motivations at all. So what if he did? How many of our
warhawks had managed to collect one deferment after another, avoid showing
up for duty, or got special treatment while they were in captivity?
If Tillman had indeed ever made it into politics, I sense he would have been too
Report thishonest and forthright to survive the bullets from this side of the pond. In any
event, he will always be a hero.
By historyguy, August 20, 2010 at 6:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
At 40 meters distance it is not likely that his “comrades” would not recognize him. He was hit with three closely packed rounds, tapped, on the head after he was down. He was murdered because he was a high-profile celebrity who was going to go public with his on-site observations of our war once he was back in the states. If you know the Special Forces and their “code” you will know that Tillman was going to break their “code” and he had to be silenced. Too bad the author did not do his homework on the case. Read the letter sent to many public officials by his father, an attorney, who gathered the repressed evidence, presented the same in his letter to military and political leaders, which came to the obvious conclusion that Pat’s death was no “accident.” The killer was then allowed to join Delta Force, as an apparent reward for his “loyalty.” Tillman’s murder is a grim reminder of what we have become during the pursuit of the American Empire. Older citizens may have trouble recognizing what has happened to our republic; younger ones think it the norm; responsible journalists either accept the original lie or the revised lie and so it goes.
Report thisBy Robert Green, August 20, 2010 at 5:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Tillman, you gambled and lost, end of story. America’s history is filled with dead mis-lead hero’s
Report thisBy camnai, August 20, 2010 at 5:26 am Link to this comment
I suspect some offence will be taken at the suggestion that Tillman may have
had an eventual political career in mind; it is of course wild speculation, and
will be seen as trying to besmirch the reputation of someone who did, for
whatever reason, give up millions of dollars to put his life on the line.
I would like to suggest to those who take umbrage, though, that politics is not
Report thisa completely dishonourable occupation, and an ambition to go into politics is
not on a par with, say, wishing to become a hedge-fund manager. I have
known a few politicians over the years and yes, they are a cynical and scheming
bunch, but politics does offer, sometimes, a chance to accomplish something
for the public good, and I submit it is the great difficulty of doing so within a
rather sclerotic political system that makes most politicians come across as
devious the way they do. A lot of people go into the trade with good
intentions.
By kalpal, August 20, 2010 at 5:07 am Link to this comment
While the coverup failed, those who covered up were never punished for it. None has been sanctioned, fired, demoted, forced to seek employement or made public fun of. Not really.
The military most appreciates those who can obscure the truth. They are the essential part of keeping the military from becoming the butt of derisive joking.
Our soldiers work hard and place their lives on the line for all of us. Their management not so much.
Report thisBy BR549, August 20, 2010 at 4:28 am Link to this comment
Please tell me this isn’t another part of the whitewash?
If Pat was even remotely interested in Chomsky, he would have been questioning our whole role over there, and knowing his personality, wouldn’t he have been attempting to find out if there were others over there who had the same feelings?
Using the term fratricide, here, in hopes that readers will somehow tone down their understanding of it being different from death from friendly fire is just a bait and switch maneuvre.
Schickel dropped the ball on this one; either that or he himself is part of the disinformation problem.
Report thisBy Michael, August 20, 2010 at 3:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What we have here is another, NOT TOO bright, individual who fell for Bushit’s lies!!!! Hey, when you voluntarily put yourself in a ‘‘WAR’’ situation…... there is always the chance that you’ll come back in a Flag draped coffin. My advice…. never volunteer to go to foreign Countries to kill people you don’t even know. Bye-bye Pat….... What a waste!
Report thisBy drbhelthi, August 20, 2010 at 3:21 am Link to this comment
A Rumsfeld “happenstance” ?
His aspartame was no happenstance.
His tamiflu was no happenstance.
His sodium fluoride was no happenstance.
The only happenstance with him is his family background. To which he has adhered.
Three rounds fired from an automatic weapon at close range, into the head = assassination. Maybe some day, his compatriots on the scene will be able to reveal accuracy, at least furtively, without being identified.
That is, if they haven´t also received three rounds to the head. Or; haven´t been subsequently assisted to deplane a chopper while in flight.
Report thisBy bogi666, August 19, 2010 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
mrfreeze,I agree with you, Tillman was an idiot. He had ample warnings, not God inspired but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have a guardian angel offering ample alternatives, the lucrative football contract. Pat went against the obvious and left his family for the sake of fate. The lesson to be learned from Tillman’s ill fated demise being not to join the military and that those career military officers consider the enlisted men cannon fodder whom they will sacrifice for the sake of a military promotion and/or a military budget increase.
Report thisBy Money is funny, August 19, 2010 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment
“I question the intelligence and motives of all those who signed on for Bush’s mercenary rich wars”
Lot’s of questions there.
The man himself as I understand was questioning the IQ’s blah blah etc. etc. who planned and orchestrated these rich wars etc. etc.
Mr. genius.
Report thisBy mrfreeze, August 19, 2010 at 11:05 pm Link to this comment
I hate to state an obvious but much under reported fact about Tillman: Most Americans
don’t care about his participation and death in the war. He volunteered to go
somewhere he, and many others did not belong, put himself in harms way and, just
because he was a jock his “legacy” somehow lives on. What a bunch of crap.
Sorry, but I question the intelligence and motives of all those who signed on for Bush’s
Report thismercenary rich wars. The fact that there are those still trying to get traction out of
Tillman proves just how desperate we are to justify our folly in Iraq.
By Money is funny, August 19, 2010 at 9:55 pm Link to this comment
He is a good man in an awful situation which is typical here in the USA for reasons that we will never fully understand.
His participation in the thriving industry of sports was rejected with much appreciation.
Such a legend makes me sad some times.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, August 19, 2010 at 2:41 pm Link to this comment
His story exposed what is happening every day ‘over there’.
The U.S. Military has turned into mercenary organization since the draft. I feel if the draft were reinstated, much of this overseas intervention would stop.
Report thisBy tropicgirl, August 19, 2010 at 1:30 pm Link to this comment
Some people just reek hero.
Report thisBy Hammond Eggs, August 19, 2010 at 12:00 pm Link to this comment
The Tillman story is truly symbolic of how utterly and thoroughly rotten and corrupt the United States government and military truly are.
Report thisBy tropicgirl, August 19, 2010 at 10:01 am Link to this comment
The only thing that is a myth here is THIS story. HOW DARE YOU? The parents
don’t even believe this bullshit and neither do most people.
We remember, Pat. And we will not forget. And you can shove this story where it
Report thisbelongs.
By tropicgirl, August 19, 2010 at 9:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The only myth here is THIS bullshit. How DARE YOU?. Not even the parents believe
this crap.
We will not forget, Pat. And we know what happened.
Report this