Top Leaderboard, Site wide
October 21, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Get Truthdig's headlines in your inbox!






Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh


Truthdig Bazaar
The Bases of Empire

The Bases of Empire

By Catherine Lutz
$17.28

more items

 
Arts and Culture

The Evolution of Feminism

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 9, 2011

By Christen Clifford

“F ’em! Goo Goo, Gaga, and Some Thoughts on Balls”
A book by Jennifer Baumgardner

In my life, feminism is everywhere and nowhere. I am mother to an 8-year-old son and 3-year-old daughter. The night my daughter was born (at home with a midwife, for those who care about that sort of thing), I spent the entire time obsessing over whether I was a good enough feminist to mother a daughter, instead of basking in the hormone high of new love.

“Our job today is less to kick open doors and more to walk into rooms.” So says Jennifer Baumgardner in her new book of feminist essays, “F ’em! Goo Goo, Gaga, and Some Thoughts on Balls.”

As a stay-at-home mother, work-from-home writer, part-time teacher/performer/curator, I understand Baumgardner’s words. I worried that choices I’d made would somehow set my daughter back—that she wouldn’t have a role model. I struggled with the demands of raising a family and needing health insurance while my husband made more money and I was exclusively breastfeeding. This was not the idea I had of myself as a feminist.

To read Truthdig excerpts of “F ’em” click here.

Baumgardner gives us her core ideas of feminism: “Egalitarianism, eradicating sexism and recognizing the historic oppression of women. Feminism is the belief in the full political, social and economic equality of all people. Feminism is also a movement to make sure that all people have access to enough information and resources (money, social support) to make authentic decisions about their lives. Thus it’s not the decision one makes so much as the ability to make a decision.” She explains that the feminism she practiced was an “expression of the trends that shaped [her] youth.”

Baumgardner’s first essay is “The Third Wave Is 40.” It opens with a neurotic moment about the author’s looks.

 

book cover

 

F ’em! Goo Goo, Gaga, and Some Thoughts on Balls

 

By Jennifer Baumgardner

 

Seal Press, 256 pages

 

Buy the book

Really? This is a book about feminism and you open with your looks?

I mean, I get it. I just turned 40 and I’m losing my looks too. I’m a feminist who is also mourning the loss of being an object, however retro and unenlightened that may sound. It’s part of what lies underneath the loss of Baumgardner’s identity as a “young feminist.”

She does admit to “a certain dissonance in my attempt to be a good actualized feminist and my desire to get the love and sexual attention I wanted.” And it is Baumgardner’s unflinching willingness to explore territory like this that makes “F ’em!” such an exciting read.

I love how Baumgardner connects her (my) generation with the feminists of the ’70s and also the women younger than we are. She puts ’90s feminism in as much of a historical perspective as possible, given that it was so recent.

An important theme of “F em!” is the existence of Third Wave feminism. The First Wave (1840-1920) focused on the rights of citizenship. The Second Wave (1960-1988) “fought for women to share in the opportunities and responsibilities men had, including creating a career, pushing off the drudgery of housework and refusing to be held hostage by their reproductive systems.” The Third Wave, which Baumgardner identifies with, was approximately 1988-2010: “Whether or not these individual men and women were raised by self-described feminists—or called themselves feminists—they were living feminist lives: Females were playing sports and running marathons, taking charge of their sex lives, being educated in greater numbers than men, running for office and working outside the home.” The most recent wave, the Fourth, approximately 2008 and onward, continues the legacy of the Third Wave and moves it into the tech-savvy, gender-sophisticated world of blogs, Twitter campaigns, transgenderism, male feminists, sex work and complex relationships within the media.

I understand why Second Wavers, who lobbied for Roe v. Wade, Title IX and the Equal Pay Act, see the Third Wavers as frivolous in our lipstick and lace T-shirts. We wore no bluestockings or even redstockings—just fishnets. And there were holes in our argument too—that taking control of our sexuality was powerful. Current TV shows like “Two Broke Girls” and “Up All Night” get a lot of credit for being female-driven, supposedly showing feminism in action, and while I personally find them enjoyable, it’s more for the liberal sprinkling of vagina jokes than anything else. I can see why some Second Wavers would be mad at us. Baumgardner writes of Second Wavers, “They were no longer the ones needing abortions or utilizing current technology.” Ouch. They fought so hard to get us out of the kitchen for this?

Competition between women, and the exclusion and rage that accompanies it, is a theme throughout “F ’em!.” Female competition is used to keep women down, and surely those who are oppressed oppress others, right? Baumgardner acknowledges this: “There is a sense that mentoring and torch passing steal from one’s own hard-won store of power.” I would have loved a more overt study of female competition.

“Every few years, feminism gets kicked up to marquee status under the rubric of having failed, like a stain remover that just didn’t do its job.” So starts an essay about the divides feminism has succumbed to—black/white, gay/straight, pro sex/anti porn—and, more specifically, about Ariel Levy’s 2005 work “Female Chauvinist Pigs,” which accused Third Wave feminists like Baumgardner of “making sex objects of other women and of themselves.” The writing is lively and fun and Baumgardner’s epilogue is what’s interesting here: She recounts meeting Levy for a drink “over the warm buzz of cocktails on a wintry Manhattan night” and liking her, noticing what they had in common.  Baumgardner’s willingness to look back on her own work and show us how her positions have changed or matured is just one of the generous gifts she has to offer. 

One of my favorite pieces in this collection is “Womyn’s Music 101,” which should be required reading for any cultural feminist. And certainly for any woman who makes music. This piece connects activism and art, giving us a history of women’s music in the ’60s and ’70s. It chronicles the beginnings of “lesbionic” Olivia Records (I was so happy Baumgardner used that word!) and Ladyslipper, which were around long before Lilith Fair. I had never heard of Cris Williamson before, nor did I know that the lesbian cruise line Olivia had begun as Olivia Records. She draws lines between Williamson in 1973 and Riot Grrrl in 1992. 

The impact of “women’s music” is still reverberating today. But remember—for those of you who were around—when there were weird strong women in rock? When Courtney Love was cool in 1994? My friend Cat and I would make an open fist with an “O” and punch the air repeatedly whenever a Hole song came on in a bar. 

 


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 13, 2011 at 8:58 pm Link to this comment

My question looks pretty straightforward to me, and not particularly colored by my sex (which you are unaware of anyway).  Why don’t you just answer it, or, if you don’t like it, say why—based on the text of the question, not what the questioner ‘sounds like’?

Report this

By Frances FrainAguirre, December 12, 2011 at 9:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There is a saying that you can catch more flies with a spoonful of honey than with a barrel of vinegar.  I hear too much vinegar in your writings. You sound to me, like the female oppressor that will replace the male oppressors in our society. How sad and disconcerting this will be! We, as women, need to act, not react. When we react, the male of the species is still pulling our strings!Good luck to you in living with your vinegar!

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 12, 2011 at 8:28 pm Link to this comment

If children are not patriarchally owned, who cares who their biological fathers are?

Report this

By Frances FrainAguirre, December 12, 2011 at 12:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Just for the record. I was commenting on the cuckoldry that was described against 1% of the women who lie about fathers of their children. I am not defining feminism by patricarchal standards. I’m saying that as women we need to also be honest and forthright! if feminism is to continue to improve the lot of women, we need, as women, to stand up for our rights and be responsible for our actions.I would like to learn how we as women, can improve this macho world in which we live. One thing I know is that power is never given freely by those in piower. It must be wrested from them!  Then we as women need to not repeat the same as has bedone to us! So how do we, as women, plan to share power and be open to those who disagree with us?

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 12, 2011 at 9:31 am Link to this comment

So feminism is about patriarchal ownership of children?

Report this

By Frances FrainAguirre, December 11, 2011 at 10:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If a man wants to know if a child is really his, he may need to get a DNA match.
It is serious abuse to claim that a man is the father when the mother may not know who the father really is. Honesty is the best policy.
In this world of ours, none of us is perfect.
We all need to be held accountable for our actions.
It seems to me that our courts have confused accountability with blame it on someone -anyone and for God’s sake don’t use your own moral convictions when you are a juror—just listen to what is said in court even if the judges suppresses some of the most important evidence! Again, even judges are human!

Report this

By Pouteria, December 9, 2011 at 11:56 pm Link to this comment

Jeez looks likke I’ll
have to wait for the
fifth wave when women put
the social spotlight on
THEIR behaviour that is
now aberrant and abusive
e.g. cuckoldry.

Cuckoldry is when a woman
tells a man she is
pregnant with his child
when, in fact, the
genetic dad is a
different fellow.

A single act of cuckoldry
is far worse abuse than
1,000 men groping some
tit without permission in
the office work space.

Yet boob grasping is
illegal sexual abuse but
cuckoldry is not. Why?

An absolute minimum of
one percent of all births
involve cuckoldry, the
second most heinous fraud
a person can commit.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 9, 2011 at 9:30 am Link to this comment

@ Anarcissie

Whatever you say my friend.

(Is this some kind of southern ritual you are referring to??? if not, you know, and I know that YOU ARE A SATANIC LIAR!!!).

Just kidding, however, if I may ask… What the fuck???

You know me.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 9, 2011 at 9:22 am Link to this comment

Goodness, EmileZ, we haven’t even been properly introduced.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 9, 2011 at 9:07 am Link to this comment

Fuck you anarcissie

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 9, 2011 at 8:59 am Link to this comment

With ‘Goo goo ga ga’ in the title, shouldn’t somebody be giving URLs to Queen videos?

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 9, 2011 at 2:45 am Link to this comment

Oops I seem to have neglected to post the link to the first youtube video I was referring to.

The Shirelles - I met Him On A Sunday

This is the updated (released some years after the original and semi-successfully imitating Phil Spector’s “wall of sound”) version of the original 1958 version which as far as I know was the first release by the first black OR female owned record label “Scepter Records”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lPF3r1Kw8k

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 9, 2011 at 2:18 am Link to this comment

The Shirelles - I met Him On A Sunday

This is the updated (released some years after the original and semi-successfully imitating Phil Spector’s “wall of sound”) version of the original 1958 version which as far as I know was the first release by the first black OR female owned record label “Scepter Records”.

Max Roach with Abbey Lincoln - Tryptich: Prayer/Protest/Peace

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMaUDAeiSIY

Mary Lou Williams - Overhand

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6jYCyx1OP0

“Inside every woman there is a whore waiting to come out”. - from “The Legend Of Lylah Clare” which I just watched the other day and is pretty damn funny.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILcbCnGUfck

Don’t mind me, I am just a blabbermouth with nothing to say whiling away my evening.

One for the road…

The Shirelles - Dooms Day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kqy4UdJ6h4A

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.