|
|||
|
Michael Moore ‘Giddy’ About Occupy Wall StreetPosted on Oct 12, 2011
Nobody can say he didn’t call it, or at least call for it, as provocateur filmmaker Michael Moore explicitly declared at the end of his last documentary, “Capitalism: A Love Story,” that he would come out from behind the camera and wait for others to join in his cause of opposing Wall Street greed before making another play for the big screen. With the Occupy Wall Street movement, Moore clearly feels like his wish has been granted, judging by his professed giddiness in this interview with The Wrap. —KA
CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By SoTexGuy, October 13, 2011 at 2:01 pm Link to this comment
Hey.. the movie Fahrenheit 911 has unlimited potential.. if it were shown on network TV instead of say NCIS or Two and a Half Men or even the slasher films on Chiller! .. there could very well be a real revolution in our country.. At the very least fewer Americans would be in any way concerned over the supposed
attempted assassination of some Saudi official.. From the pictures of that guy I personally don’t know how he’s lived so long anyway!
Moore has frequently apologized for blindly supporting the Democrats and Obama specifically.. if he still has hope for that shyster or other Demo-crooks then he’s no worse than a few million other adult Americans… and none of them have made such a contribution as Moore.
My point was and is only that if TD pundits can go after that clod Christie over his weight problem.. why not Moore? For his own health and well-being if for no other reason.
Adios!
Report thisBy blogdog, October 13, 2011 at 1:34 pm Link to this comment
...own his movies and watch them too! same here - very entertaining
but, during the Obomber campaign, not one of those Left Gatekeepers (including Moore, of course)
showed the guts to call him on his proposal to bomb Pakistan and now, not one of them shows the
guts to call him on bombing Libya, in particular the continued bombing of the 100,000 civilians of
Sirte (simply fighting to defend their city from invasion) - R2P is, and has been since day 1, a full-on
reign of terror - as of October 13, 2011: 25,638 NATO Sorties, 9,504 Air Combat Missions
NATO is bombing Sirte into something to rival Guernica - and, even among the 99% occupiers, how
much anti-war sentiment is heard? precious little - the deafening silence of the Left Gatekeepers
belies their complicity in covering up NATO’s war crimes
just watch this movement get hi-jacked by foundation-funded, Left/Lib Gatekeepers and
Report thischanneled into Obomber’s re-election movement - just watch
By SoTexGuy, October 13, 2011 at 12:48 pm Link to this comment
I’m a huge Moore fan.. own his movies and watch them too! He’s not perfect. Who is? we don’t need another religion anyway..
On the subject.. Here’s a question.. why won’t Robinson et-al attack Michael Moore on his obvious obesity problem?
And just ‘cause he isn’t contemplating public office ain’t an answer.
Adios!
Report thisBy MK77, October 13, 2011 at 11:59 am Link to this comment
Diana,
What we need, first and foremost, is for diehard Democratic voters to apologize to Ralph Nader and concede that the Democratic Party is every bit as committed to furthering imperial interests as the Republican Party is.
We need people to renounce “lesser evilism” at the ballot box once and for all, and rally around a left candidate and party no matter what the electoral outcome.
That is the very first thing that needs to happen.
Gore/Kerry/Obama enthusiasts have erred and they have sinned. They need to proclaim loudly that they will sin no more!
Report thisBy bpawk, October 13, 2011 at 11:40 am Link to this comment
I’m afraid the time has past for Ralph Nader - Americans didn’t appreciate all he did for them anyway - he was the only real ‘left’ in America and Americans rejected him and went for the old Tweedledee or Tweedledum. Guess who is to blame then - you had your chance!
Report thisBy blogdog, October 13, 2011 at 11:35 am Link to this comment
Moore on the scene - I heard one report that when he took that spotlight a
collective groan was heard - why? probably because by now so many realize the
‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ is a limited hangout - not unlike Goodman, Chomskey,
Cockburn, Greenwald, Rothstein, et al - limited hangouts on the 9/11 mime -
lynchpin to the global war of terror
so where’s the Left/Lib/Prog anti-war movement now? dead behind the wave of
Report thisphony ‘hope and change’ - lately even deader, behind none willing to show the
guts to challenge NATO propaganda, allowing for legitimizing the wholesale
bombing of Libya, in particular Sirte, soon to rival Guernica as one of history’s
most tragic touchstones to waring imperialist enterprise - where are the
Left/Lib/Prog voices of outrage?
By CenterOfMass, October 13, 2011 at 11:13 am Link to this comment
@Diana: “Do you vote for Romney (the reluctant choice of the Republicans) or do you merely keep talking and do nothing? What are the choices?”
Yeah, not a great situation. However, I have a hypothesis to offer. Just like Obama is not the progressive that he claimed to be, I think the Romney is not the conservative that he now claims to be. When he was governor of Massachusetts, he was a pretty reasonable guy. I think he is pandering to the conservative block to get elected now.
What would he be like, as POTUS? I don’t know. Maybe not as conservative as Diana fears. Or maybe all of the Wall Street influence corrupts absolutely, and he’d end up being Mr. Wall Street. That would suck. I just don’t know if it would suck as much as now.
Wouldn’t that be wild, if Romney turned out to be more moderate than Obama? Thoughts?
Report thisBy Diana, October 13, 2011 at 9:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If this national sit-in movement were to call for Ralph
Nader to run, it could perhaps “shake up” the other two
parties. I believe Nader had some health issues a few
years ago (heart I believe) so I’m not sure he would
take this on now. It takes more than an elected
president to make the kind of changes needed, but the
seed needs to be planted.
Currently trying to deal with corporate America or the
Report thisinsurance industry is like working with a Cobra: you
don’t befriend it - you cut it’s head off!
By bpawk, October 13, 2011 at 7:57 am Link to this comment
Ralph Nader was never the spoiler, the Dem’s candidate was the spoiler in your elections. I guess it’s too hard to put people’s head around that but if enough abandoned the Dems and went to Ralph you would have had a better more Scandinavian-model type of government where there’s regulations and higher taxes and ‘socialist’ medicare for all as well as an excellent quality of life for the average person (and it works as they are in a better position than the U.S.)Unfettered capitalism only works for a few.
Report thisBy Diana, October 13, 2011 at 4:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
MK77 so what’s your “solution” (limited as we are)?
Do you join the Tea Party nuts? Do you vote for Romney
(the reluctant choice of the Republicans) or do you
merely keep talking and do nothing? What are the
choices?
Let’s NOT forget the mess Bush & Cheney left behind:
Report thisthat’s where Obama came in. If there where another
choice in this election (who could win), I would
seriously consider that person.
By MK77, October 13, 2011 at 2:00 am Link to this comment
“Obama has not delivered on his promise to change things, but it is pretty tough to try to work with people who have one objective - that is to defeat him.”
There is no evidence whatsoever that Obama has tried to push the country in even a slightly more progressive direction.
Remember, it was Obama who appointed a conservative cabinet and conservative advisers (Geithner, Summers, Gates, etc.).
It was Obama who had conservative Max Baucus preside over healthcare in the Senate, and Obama who signed a bill without a public option.
It was Obama who escalated the war in Afghanistan and waged conflicts in Pakistan, Yemen, and Libya.
It was Obama who wanted to bail out the auto companies, banks, and insurance firms.
It was Obama who turned his back on old friends like Jeremiah Wright and Cornel West.
It was Obama who proposed cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
The notion that this is some leftward-leaning man who has been stymied by a bunch of right-wing meanies is utter nonsense. Obama has not fought for a single progressive cause. He’s as conservative as most Republicans.
Report thisBy MK77, October 13, 2011 at 1:45 am Link to this comment
“...if the Republicans win the next election, you may find Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid - some of the few “safety nets” completely dismantled.”
Actually, those programs would likely be in SAFER hands under a Republican administration because Democrats everywhere would revolt if some proposal were put forward to cut them. Bush tried to privatize Social Security, but his plan was scuttled after people cried foul.
Obama recently said cuts in SS and Medicare will have to be on the table during future deficit-reduction talks, and what did Democrats around the country say or do? Absolutely nothing!
Report thisBy Diana, October 12, 2011 at 9:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
MK77 if the Republicans win the next election, you
Report thismay find Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid - some
of the few “safety nets” completely dismantled. That
could be a real big difference for many Americans
that will be felt in a most tragic way. Most of the
things you’ve mentioned about Obama, I would agree
with. He has tried to please too many, and has ended
up losing his base support, but I actually do believe
it can get worse. Obama has not delivered on his
promise to change things, but it is pretty tough to
try to work with people who have one objective - that
is to defeat him. In my view, the Republicans are
telling us all to go to hell.
By MK77, October 12, 2011 at 6:03 pm Link to this comment
“Obama has been disappointing, however, the alternative party is worse!”
There’s not a lick of evidence to support the statement above.
On what major issue has Obama been discernibly different than George W. Bush?
-Bailout of megacorporations? Nope.
-Closing Guantanamo Bay? Nope.
-Lavish sums of money to Israel? Nope.
-Pentagon spending? Nope.
-Halting wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere? Nope.
I can only think of one issue where Obama has diverged from the Bush agenda: healthcare. In fact, Obama turned out to be to the RIGHT of Bush on the issue, because at least Bush didn’t sign a bill into law which forces every American to buy junk insurance policies.
It’s this tired, lame old thinking that the Democrats are “better” than the Republicans that is really retarding progress in this country. The 2 parties are identical twins, and both need to be repudiated.
Report thisBy iamarkeo@sbcglobal.net, October 12, 2011 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Excuse me bpauk, but unless I’m missing something, wasn’t it Bush, who conspired with Paulsen,(and with no oversight) to release that money to the banker thieves in the first place? I certainly don’t agree with Obama’s continuation of the bailout, nor do I agree with his continuation of the wars, but it began with Bush! I am greatly disappointed with what Obama has done while in office, but still consider him the lesser of two evils. I agree with Diana that our votes would have been lost to the RepubliCons. Nader is a good guy, but would never get the votes, nor would he have gotten any cooperation in Congress. Ross Perot was an honest man, but look what happened to him! People need to wake up to the truth; Moore is not running for office. He is merely trying to awaken the people to form a movement. We are becoming an Oligarchy, with the 1% masters and the 99% serfs. I’m 65 and have learned that patience is a virtue. The Occupy Movement will increase awareness. Continue on this journey!
Report thisBy Diana, October 12, 2011 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I have great admiration for Ralph Nader, but we also
know (as did Moore) that a vote for Nader would
simply be a vote for the Republicans.
A third party candidate unfortunately only works as a
spoiler, at this point, in our two-party system.
Obama has been disappointing, however, the
alternative party is worse!
Many of us were excited about Obama and all he stood
for but he didn’t deliver. What choices do we have?
Michael Moore has opened our minds to the lies we’ve
been fed (if he happens to make a living at it - so
what?).
When I heard someone mention Mrs. Obama’s $500 tennis
Report thisshoes, I realized they had crossed over to the other
side. Big turn-off!
By Ken, October 12, 2011 at 9:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Wall Street” by Beecher’s Fault
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVOLTrhXhac
http://www.beechersfault.com
Report thisBy bpawk, October 12, 2011 at 8:55 am Link to this comment
Try to remember that Moore pestered Ralph Nader to get out of the presidential race a few years back so that the Democrats (you know, the ones who enabled Wall Street and the rich with their bailouts, favourable tax breaks and deregulation) could win. Now that you’re feeling the effects of Democrat rule, don’t you wish Ralph was in the game? He was the only viable alternative but people thought they were too good for him. Moore is a soft liberal - like Obama he speaks a good left-wing agenda, but as soon as he comes to power ... whereas Ralph has a stellar track record of caring about the average person.
Report this