LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

How the IRS' Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar

The Fall: A Novel

By Ryan Quinn
$14.99

more items

 
Arts and Culture

‘Lost Horizon’ for American Ovaries

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 28, 2011

By Cherilyn Parsons

Ann Patchett’s sixth novel, “State of Wonder,” poses a provocative question: If, ladies, you could preserve your fertility into your 50s, 60s or even later, would you?

“State of Wonder” is a quest story with a modern twist. In the classic quest structure, as outlined most famously by Joseph Campbell, the hero is called to find a missing treasure that carries great power: a grail, a fountain of youth, a magic ring or, here, perpetual fertility.

In this novel, our heroine is a 42-year-old cholesterol researcher named Marina Singh, who is ambivalent about having children. She ventures into the Amazon at the behest of her employer, a Minnesota-based pharmaceutical firm, Vogel. The company has been secretly supporting an eccentric scientist, Dr. Annick Swenson, who has discovered an Amazonian tribe, the Lakashi, whose women can bear children until they die.

“The rest of their body goes along its path to destruction,” one of the characters explains, “while the reproductive system stays daisy fresh. This is the end of IVF. No more expense, no more shots that don’t end up working, no more donor eggs and surrogates. ... Imagine someone offering you the equivalent of ‘Lost Horizon’ for American ovaries. … Put off your reproductive decisions for as long as you want. We’re not talking 45, we’re talking 50, 60, maybe beyond that. You can always have children.”

The secret seems to lie in the bark of a particular tree that the Lakashi women chew. Swenson is supposed to be isolating the fertility substance and developing it into a drug for Vogel. Problem is, Swenson has gone incommunicado. Vogel is eager to market this drug, sure to be a bonanza. To check on Swenson’s progress, Vogel already sent down one researcher—Anders Eckman, an enthusiastic family man and Marina’s research partner. He allegedly died of fever.

Marina goes to the Amazon on behalf of Anders’ wife, who doesn’t believe he’s really dead. She goes because Anders was a friend. She goes because the president of Vogel, Mr. Fox, is her secret lover, albeit a boring man who is 18 years her senior.

 

book cover

 

State of Wonder

 

By Ann Patchett

 

Harper, 368 pages

 

Buy the book

If Marina doesn’t sound very thrilling as a person, you’re right. The traditional quest story requires a resistant, ordinary kind of hero, and she’s no adventurer. She’s the type who “had been a very good student, but she only raised her hand when she was certain of the answer.” That dutiful girl is now about to head into no man’s land in search of treasure.

Such tales always have a shadowy, dangerous figure guarding the treasure: Swenson, I presume. The hero must get past gatekeepers, in this case a bohemian artist/surfer couple who guard access to Swenson’s whereabouts. A sidekick usually arrives to help—a mysterious, faithful, brilliant deaf-mute boy that Swenson named Easter since he arrived suddenly in the Lakashi village on the holiday. One of the best characters in the novel, he is the magical child, another archetype.

Once allowed in—once Marina is headed down the Rio Negro into the tribal territory—the hero faces obstacles: a battle with a 15-foot anaconda, a heck of a lot of bugs and the massive jungle itself. There are even neighboring cannibals.

In the mysterious land, the hero must adapt, gathering lessons along the way. Patchett describes the Lakashi vividly: their hair braiding, fire rituals, frequent touching and the women’s loose smocks: “Among the female Lakashi all clothes were maternity clothes.” Marina’s own clothing is stolen, and the women dress her in a smock. And terrified at first of the river, that “murky soup” where “there was no telling what was coming at you,” Marina begins to enjoy swimming in it.

To see long excerpts from “State of Wonder” at Google Books, click here.

I won’t detail the last third of the novel, but it follows the formula to the end. The sought-after treasure will prove to be different—better, wiser, more powerful, also more dangerous—than what the hero and those who sent her on the journey had believed. The voyage will require a terrible sacrifice. Finally, the hero will return home, possessing new wisdom or a gift.

Many reviewers have compared this novel to “Heart of Darkness,” but other than the jungle and some shady medical ethics, “State of Wonder” is nothing like Joseph Conrad’s book. The darkness of Patchett’s novel belongs not to the jungle but to our modern world, especially the corporate goal of profit above all else. A motley cohort of four other scientists working with Swenson has discovered something else in the tree bark, a substance that could “have enormous benefits to world health,” the doctor says, though “no financial benefits for company shareholders.” Except for some notable slips in medical ethics (experimenting on unsuspecting Lakashis for the sake of the rest of the world), the scientists are on the side of poor people. As Swenson puts it, they don’t see “any harm in making an American pharmaceutical company pay” for something that could help impoverished people while developing a fertility drug that “will, if anything, undermine the health of women and make [the company] a truly obscene fortune.”

 

1   2   NEXT PAGE >>>

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: The American Scream: Going Hoarse Without Speaking

Next item: God Bless Cantankerous Old Men



New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

nat's avatar

By nat, September 20, 2011 at 4:30 pm Link to this comment

Something is unsettling about having kids at 60…...we weren’t made that way for a
reason!

Report this
adrienrain's avatar

By adrienrain, August 7, 2011 at 12:58 am Link to this comment

I’d take it…..........but I wouldn’t have children.

Report this

By JEA, August 2, 2011 at 12:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I remember listening to a talk radio program years ago (before all the extremism) where the host was talking about older men having children. And as old men were calling in talking about how great it was to have a toddler running around while they were in their 60s, all I could think was how these kids would lose their fathers so young.

Report this
Queenie's avatar

By Queenie, July 31, 2011 at 12:36 pm Link to this comment

How about fixing the rest of the planet before going off and having MORE children @ age 50 - 60 or whatever. Huh? How about thinking of Mother Earth just ONCE and the destruction over-population is causing right now without adding a mess of orphans to the mix.

Millions of humans are suffering from disease and starvation and some people think adding MORE is beneficial in some way?

Morons.

Report this

By purplewolf, July 31, 2011 at 9:28 am Link to this comment

We already have women who are giving birth in their 60’s and 70’s now thanks to medical science. One woman in England had 2 children in her late 60’s and died when the oldest child was about 5. This is devastating for her children as this woman had no husband or other children. Who will care for these kids ?

If the PTB could make every woman fertile until death, I believe the radicals who are trying to end all abortion/ birth control now, would make it mandatory that all women would be forced into that situation. Their only goal is to make more and more excessive humans on the planet, never mind that the earth is running out of resources to provide a “healthy” life for all of the current population.

We can hope that this never happens. Women are people, not machines to constantly pop out an endless supply of slaves and cannon fodder for the use and abuse of governments and their minions.

Report this

By M, July 31, 2011 at 9:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Relax, it’s just fiction.

Report this

By Textynn, July 31, 2011 at 9:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hormones keep a body young. I would never want to have
a baby late in life but hormones would make you live
longer, stronger, and keep up sex drives which makes
life more exciting and keeps women feeling “in the
game”.  I think it’s great and I don’t believe hormones
are deadly.  I think the longer people live the heaver
their toxic load.  I think that is the source of the
problems.

Report this
prisnersdilema's avatar

By prisnersdilema, July 30, 2011 at 6:59 am Link to this comment

If you have ever enjoyed the privilege of caring for a new born, nurturing a child through
infancy, child hood, and adolescence, you would understand why having children later in
life, is a very bad idea.

The elderly, may have experience to offer as grandparents, but hurting a child requires
high energy and a closer identification with the worlds current living situation.

Having children at sixty means parents would be approaching mid seventies when their
children hit adolescence, I wonder if they would understand the life their child is faced
with or even feel comfortable with the technology.

Once again, the children’s needs were not considered, but they are treated as objects
equivalent to a possession to be acquired. How selfish.

Please don’t rationalize, a response with anecdotal evidence of the wonders of elderly
parent hood, stop kidding yourself with pleasant and comforting dreams, nature has had
it right all along. 

The grotesquerie of a nation of aging Octomoms, would be a testament to our depravity,
and nothing more.

Report this

By anna, July 30, 2011 at 6:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hhhmmm.  Why bear children until you die and leave them parentless?  That is not
a formula for preservation or “health” . . . unless, of course, the plan is to have the
children inhabit a land akin to Lord of the Flies.  Sounds like a “keep them
barefoot and pregnant” plan to me.

Report this

By cherilyn, July 29, 2011 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment

Nope, not even close.

There’s one part of the ending that could be said to be predictable. And the hero’s
journey/quest elements do continue to the end. But none of the rest that you
say…. Read the book!

Report this

By SarcastiCanuck, July 29, 2011 at 11:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Let me guess the rest.The boring maiden destroys the executive branch of the evil pharmaceutical company,finds a handsome male hero who gives her multiple orgasms,vacuums the carpets and slays dragons,brings the world saving drug to the world at no cost to mankind,then dissapears into anonymous bliss with her Old Spice Guy in tow.Ahhhhh,I love a happy ending…..Where can I get some of those blue mushrooms?

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.