LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 21, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

GOP Senator's Hypocrisy on Tornado Aid, Jon Stewart Hates Washington, and More

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

The Promise of a Courageous Al-Jazeera America May Be Fading

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
 * NEW! * Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
 * NEW! * Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Beginner’s Goodbye

The Beginner’s Goodbye

By Anne Tyler
$15.94

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Celebrity Endorsements: Money for Nothing?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 13, 2011
AP / Koji Sasahara

In the world of advertising, celebrity always equals money, and anything that these luminaries—whether from entertainment, sports or even politics—touch (even by accident) is tantamount to tangible, profitable product placement, right?

Actually, not necessarily, according to a study of celeb endorsements published in Advertising Age under the startling headline, “Celebrities in Advertising Are Almost Always a Big Waste of Money.” And this is the sound of celebrities scrambling to pocket their free swag while it lasts.  —KA

Advertising Age:

We set out to understand whether celebrities today are really worth the significant investment that brands were making. We studied every nationally televised ad for the first 11 months of 2010 and found that celebrity ads performed either below average or merely equaled it. Specifically, our study, 2010 Celebrity Advertisements: Exposing a Myth of Advertising Effectiveness, 2010, showed that fewer than 12% of ads using celebrities exceeded a 10% lift, and one-fifth of celebrity ads had a negative impact on advertising effectiveness.

Read more

 

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: No ‘Kennedys’ for History Channel

Next item: Make War, Not Love



New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By sudha, January 18, 2011 at 5:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

there is no needed information ...only a limited information is presented.

Report this

By Caramx, January 16, 2011 at 5:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I was wearing Rolex and Lacoste long before celebrities made them more popular. Now I don’t wear them at all and wear cheap stuff.  The crass commercialism makes me throw up.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, January 14, 2011 at 8:27 pm Link to this comment

Celebrity Endorsements:

Money for Nothing and your chicks for free.

Report this

By samosamo, January 14, 2011 at 5:32 pm Link to this comment

Celebrities. That very empty part of american culture that
ostensibly tries to distract attention from whatever is really of
importance. Promotion of worship of graven images of what has
little or nothing to do with life. An insult to nature.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.