|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
Celebrity Endorsements: Money for Nothing?Posted on Jan 13, 2011
In the world of advertising, celebrity always equals money, and anything that these luminaries—whether from entertainment, sports or even politics—touch (even by accident) is tantamount to tangible, profitable product placement, right? Actually, not necessarily, according to a study of celeb endorsements published in Advertising Age under the startling headline, “Celebrities in Advertising Are Almost Always a Big Waste of Money.” And this is the sound of celebrities scrambling to pocket their free swag while it lasts. —KA
New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By sudha, January 18, 2011 at 5:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
there is no needed information ...only a limited information is presented.
Report thisBy Caramx, January 16, 2011 at 5:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I was wearing Rolex and Lacoste long before celebrities made them more popular. Now I don’t wear them at all and wear cheap stuff. The crass commercialism makes me throw up.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, January 14, 2011 at 8:27 pm Link to this comment
Celebrity Endorsements:
Money for Nothing and your chicks for free.
Report thisBy samosamo, January 14, 2011 at 5:32 pm Link to this comment
Celebrities. That very empty part of american culture that
Report thisostensibly tries to distract attention from whatever is really of
importance. Promotion of worship of graven images of what has
little or nothing to do with life. An insult to nature.