|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Bradley Manning Treatment Reveals Continued Government Complicity in TorturePosted on Mar 25, 2011
By Marjorie Cohn Editor’s note: This article originally ran on the American Constitution Society blog. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is facing court-martial for allegedly leaking military reports and diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks, is being held in solitary confinement in Quantico brig in Virginia. Each night, he is forced to strip naked and sleep in a gown made of coarse material. He has been made to stand naked in the morning as other inmates walk by and look. As journalist Lance Tapley documents in his chapter on torture in the supermax prisons in “The United States and Torture,” solitary confinement can lead to hallucinations and suicide; it is considered to be torture. Manning’s forced nudity amounts to humiliating and degrading treatment, in violation of U.S. and international law. Nevertheless, President Barack Obama defended Manning’s treatment, saying, “I’ve actually asked the Pentagon whether or not the procedures . . . are appropriate. They assured me they are.” Obama’s deference is reminiscent of President George W. Bush, who asked “the most senior legal officers in the U.S. government” to review the interrogation techniques. “They assured me they did not constitute torture,” Bush said. The order for Manning’s nudity apparently followed what he described as a sarcastic comment he made to guards after their repeated harassment of him regarding how he was to salute them. Manning said that if he were intent on strangling himself, he could use his underwear or flip-flops. “In my 40 years of hospital psychiatric practice, I’ve never heard of something like this,” said Dr. Steven Sharfstein, a former president of the American Psychiatric Association. “In some very unusual circumstances, when people are intensely suicidal, you might put them in a hospital gown. ... But it’s very, very unusual to be in that kind of suicide watch for this long a period of time.” Sharfstein also was concerned that military officials appeared to defy the recommendations of mental health professionals. “He’s been examined by psychiatrists who said he’s not suicidal. ... They are making medical judgments in the face of medical evaluations to the contrary,” Sharfstein noted. After State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley criticized Manning’s conditions of confinement, the White House forced him to resign. Crowley had said the restrictions were “ridiculous, counterproductive and stupid.” It appears that Washington is more intent on sending a message to would-be whistle-blowers than on upholding the laws that prohibit torture and abuse. Torture is commonplace in countries strongly allied with the United States. Vice President Omar Suleiman, Egypt’s intelligence chief, was the lynchpin for Egyptian torture when the CIA sent prisoners to Egypt in its extraordinary rendition program. A former CIA agent observed, “If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria. If you want someone to disappear—never to see them again—you send them to Egypt.” In her chapter in “The United States and Torture,” New Yorker journalist Jane Mayer cites Egypt as the most common destination for suspects rendered by the United States. She describes the rendering of Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi to Egypt, where he was tortured and made a false confession that Colin Powell cited as he importuned the Security Council to approve the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Al-Libi later recanted his confession. Although there is general consensus that torture does not work—the subject will say anything to get the torture to stop—what if it did work? Would that justify torturing people into providing information? Philosopher John Lango’s chapter asks whether an extreme emergency can ever trump the absolute prohibition of torture. Lango rejects the nuclear weapon and ticking bomb scenarios as “fantasy” and declares, “Terrorism can never warrant terroristic torment.” He suggests a protocol to the Convention against Torture to fortify the moral prohibition of torture and cruel treatment. The moral equivalence of torture and “one-sided warfare” is explored in professor Richard Falk’s provocative chapter. He contrasts the liberal moral outrage at torture with uncritical acceptance of one-sided warfare. Nations, particularly the United States, inflict horrific pain on primarily nonwhite people in other countries, but suffer no consequences. Falk draws an analogy between the torture victim and the subjects of one-sided warfare—both are under the total control of the perpetrator. He recommends adherence to international humanitarian law and repudiation of “wars of choice.” In “The United States and Torture,” a historian, a political scientist, a philosopher, a psychologist, a sociologist, two journalists and eight lawyers detail the complicity of the U.S. government in the torture and cruel treatment of prisoners both at home and abroad, and strategies for accountability. In her compelling preface, Sister Dianna Ortiz describes the unimaginable treatment she endured in 1987 when she was in Guatemala doing missionary work while the United States was supporting the dictatorship there. The first step in changing policy is to understand its history and the motivation behind it. I hope this book will accomplish that goal.
New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By PatrickHenry, April 1, 2011 at 7:45 pm Link to this comment
Manning is going through the trials and tribulations of fame.
He is too much of a household name to ‘disappear’, too many Americans are aware of his plight and sympathize with with his disclosures.
Why is Mannings courts martial taking so long? Were’s the military efficiency of this railroading.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, April 1, 2011 at 1:07 pm Link to this comment
gerard,
concur.
My intention is to present the idea that types such as Mrs. Napolitano, via their disinformative manner of massageing the info, turn our children-grandchildren veterans into “nobodies”.
Regardless of why they enlisted and served in the U.S. Military, they non-the-less served, thinking they were behaving patriotically and supporting the best interests of the USofA.
My point is to empasize that they receive abusive treatment by Department of Homeland Security Secretary-types, which, via psychological methodology, reduces them to PTSD-psychologically-maladapted, which tends to preempt the genuine value of their speaking out against the atrocities inflicted on the Arab & Moslem world citizenry by the U.S.Military. Devaluing their opinions is the goal of Napolitano-types, pawns of the GHWBushSr entourage.
My apology for not expressing my idea more clearly.
Report thisBy RenZo, April 1, 2011 at 12:23 pm Link to this comment
@ drbhelthi - I take exception to labeling foreign wars, torture, and war crimes “un-American”, although I think I understand that you intend this as a counterfactual assertion, in the sense that we used to believe that “American” represented “... a never-ending battle for truth, justice, [and the American way]!”
And again, drbhelthi, one branch denies atrocities, defends killing peasants with drone delivered bombs from the sky while another branch labels those who carry out these policies (the foot soldiers) as incompetent or liars and criminals (when they speak the truth), but also refuses to take the best care of them after destroying their lives also.
@ gerard - “Meantime, we who permit this system to operate…”
Report thisI agree. If I had children [and they would now be of an age to die in foreign imperialist wars] I would never stop shouting and protesting (even at the risk of imprisonment myself) to stop the killing maiming torturing and destruction. What perturbs (understated by far) me the most, what I find completely incomprehensible, is that this populace is so unaware, so pre-occupied, so undereducated, so ignorant as to ALLOW their children to die to preserve corporate wealth.
By gerard, March 31, 2011 at 8:16 pm Link to this comment
drbhelthi: That phrase “veteran nobodies” I have to protest. Soldiers and ex-soldiers are fully human beings and if they aren’t killed, they bear the wounds to prove it—mental and physical wounds.
Report thisThe fact that “they should have known bettere than to get into the military ranks” is beside the point, since enormous pressures push them in, whether ignorance, lack of jobs, foolish idealism or line of least resistance at the time. Probably only a tiny minority joined up with a conscious desire to kill people. Most of them are lied into it, and are too
naive to recognize the lies. Meantime, we who permit this system to operate are the ones who should confess our own sins as being “political nobodies” for tolerating wars, and then start working to organize “Jobs for Peace” as the slogan goes.
By drbhelthi, March 31, 2011 at 6:02 am Link to this comment
“If this kid is guilty than every soldier that has confessed to family members of the atrocities going on during deployment is guilty too.” ignorance_perhaps
Which is the basic motive for Mrs. Janet Napolitano, 3rd Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, classifying returning veterans as threats to national security.
Take American youth to a foreign land, maim their psyches with un-American behavior and their bodies with inoculations and exposure to depleted-uranium-radiation, upon return to the U.S. classify them as PTSD cases. Label anything they say publicly as incompetent. What do we have? U.S. American veteran nobodies.
Report thisBy ignorance_perhaps, March 30, 2011 at 6:05 pm Link to this comment
I feel sorry for this kid. If anyone knows how
Report thisranking works in the military, they’d know as a Pfc.
you don’t have the authorization for information like
that to just fall on your lap. He can account for
things he has physically witnessed but all else came
from someone else’s hand(s) and this poor kid is
having to suffer for letting the rest of us know
information that mainstream media failed to give us.
When I hear others saying this kid is a traitor to
America it hurts my ears. The only thing this kid is
guilty of is choosing people over a war, and laying
honesty over the lies. But hey don’t be surprised
there are actually thousands of innocent men who have
been found innocent by a jury of fellow Americans
that are still locked up. America, where you are
guilty locked up even after being proven innocent
over a period of 9 years and 100 eye-witnesses to
back you up. Oh but lets not point the finger at our
country…oh heavens no, why should we, when we can criticize other countries for the same inhumane
practices. If this kid is guilty than every soldier
that has confessed to family members of the
atrocities going on during deployment is guilty too.
By RenZo, March 30, 2011 at 10:15 am Link to this comment
In the early nineties (nineteen nineties) a very good friend secured asylum in the US. I am familiar with his story of torture in Moscow by the local police, the very story that lead the Court to grant asylum in the US. The torture consisted in twice, for one-night periods, having restrained him to a chair in the middle of the police station NAKED. This was ad hoc punishment for his being gay, nothing else. I see NO difference (except for duration) between his torture in Moscow (USSR) and the current torture of Manning. Incidentally, both are gay. But in one case a branch of the US government uses methods of torture that in another case was emphatically and loudly called “torture” by the US government.
Report thisThe US is slipping inexorably into the quicksand of failed statehood. There is no rationale or justification possible.
By John Butler, March 30, 2011 at 9:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It is extaordinary that the Military cannot see what their treatment of Pfc. Manning is doing to the reputation of their country . If I were the citizen of a nation that was about to “liberated ” by these flint faced , callous and arrogant cyborgs ; I would be sharpening my pitchfork .
Report thisBy drbhelthi, March 30, 2011 at 6:18 am Link to this comment
“I am also a retired military officer who has long believed that our civilian power must balance our military power.” (gerard - some “diplomatic creep"appearing in today’s (27th) London Guardian)
Right.
Begin with disinformation, attempting to sway the interpretation of the body of the message. If this thought were genuine, the hypocritical tripe would not have followed.
Which of the NAZI-types in Junior´s (GHWBushSr entourage) cabinet have been punished for the treason committed, when Mrs. Valerie Plame-Wilson was publicly identified? Who has been punished for the treason that resulted in the deaths of several operatives imbedded in foreign governments? Comrade Gordon Liddy was conveniently misused as scapegoat for several USGov botches.
CONVERSELY, Bradley Manning is being scapegoated for serving the best interests of the United States of America, for revealing violations of the initial concept, excerpted above, “civilian power must balance our military power”. THERE IS NO BALANCE !
The statement of the former, alleged officer, reflects the trend of the last several USGov administrations, and their money-prostituted-pawns in the USMilitary, who wear stars on their shoulders. Some of whom participated in the attack on the hired-MOSSAD attack on the U.S. Citizenry on 9-11. (Murder of a few thousand Americans and foreign visitors, in order for one of their good ole boys to receive a huge insurance payout.) All of which general officers seem to have traded their patriotism for military status and retirement income. However, increasing evidence suggests that they will receive NO retirement income, and many will not live to enjoy it. Similarly, all of us current retirees.
To the ill-informed person who challenged me on a Tomahawk-Cruise missile having made the initial hole in the Pentagon. Sorting thru my paper-work yesterday, I dug up a copy of a notification to a foreign intelligence agency, in which the FBI notified that no airplane, but rather, a Cruise missile made the hole in the Pentagon. The subsequent explosion was required to take out one, specific General Officer.
Consistent refutation of accurate information is the standard behavior for pawns of the USGOV. Regardless of whether they use homey aliases from the CIA list, or not. They are obliged to refute all information that accurately describes the status quo of the USGOV, and U.S. Military activities. Especially, info about U.S. possession of UFOs, and the one “race” of extra-earthers who appear to be humans - or vice-versa. They were tagged by Adolf Hitler as “Aryans,” but were present prior to his prominence.
Report thisBy gerard, March 29, 2011 at 8:39 pm Link to this comment
Taken from former State Dept. Crowleys revised statement about why he said Manning’s treatment is “ridiculous and stupid,” you can see some “diplomatic creep"appearing in today’s (27th) London Guardian:
“I am also a retired military officer who has long believed that our civilian power must balance our military power. Part of our strength comes from international recognition that the United States practises what we preach. Most of the time, we do. This strategic narrative has made us, broadly speaking, the most admired country in the world.
“To be clear, Private Manning is rightly facing prosecution and, if convicted, should spend a long, long time in prison. Having been deeply engaged in the WikiLeaks issue for many months, I know that the 251,000 diplomatic cables included properly classified information directly connected to our national interest. The release placed the lives of activists around the world at risk.
“Julian Assange and others have suggested that the release of the cables was to expose wrongdoing. Nonsense.
“While everyone can point to an isolated cable, taken as a whole, the cables tell a compelling story of “rightdoing” – of US diplomats engaged in 189 countries around the world, working on behalf of the American people, and serving broader interests as well. As a nation, we are proud of the story the cables tell, even as we decry their release.
Some questions logically arise:
Report this1.Should a “retired military officer” make any difference in one’s views of just and unjust? What’s the relevance other than self-exoneration?
2. “The United States practices what it preaches”?—and that as “a strategic narrative” only???? The “most admired country in the world??”
3. ...“Is rightly facing prosecution and if convicted should spend a long, long time in prison ..”??
4. The Leaks “placed the lives of activists (how come that strange word here?) around the world at risk.” People killing people are “activists”? So then how manytens of thousands of lives of “activists"have been put at risk by U.S. empire-building wars in the Middle East not only at risk, but made them extinct?
5. If we are “proud” of the release of the cable materials, why is Manning stripped not only of his clothes but of his civil rights?
By Gary Mont, March 29, 2011 at 3:59 pm Link to this comment
gerard: “In all the argument, don’t forget—Manning has not been tried and proven guilty, and so any punishment at all is unjustified according to U.S.law.
Precisely. The US government no longer answers to the law of the land, or the people of the US. It is completely self-governing and does what it wants without even notifying the people of its intentions.
I think this is due, legally, to their having secretly declared a state of war and thus they are functioning under the War Act rules, rather than peace time rules.
It remains to be seen exactly who they have declared war against, but I assume it is the people of the USA and perhaps the rest of the world as well.
Report thisBy gerard, March 29, 2011 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment
In all the argument, don’t forget—Manning has not been tried and proven guilty, and so any punishment at all is unjustified according to U.S.law.
How any individual or group FEELS about what he did or did not do is no justification for punishment.
He is being punished not because he “released State secrets” but because he exposed the hypocrisy and mendacity of what passes for “diplomacy”, whch embarrassed some haughty officials who have power over us to the degree that they can throw any of us in solitary without doing any more than accusing us of something that embarrasses them or threatens their authority. In that sense WE ARE ALL BRADLEY MANNING, and to do nothing to prevent his abuse is to assent to it.
Report thisBy Gary Mont, March 29, 2011 at 6:55 am Link to this comment
drbhelthi: “While I recognize the overall concept to be valid, I would like to respectfully disagree with the statement as presented.”
—-
You are of course entirely correct. I should have stated that it was the final culmination of the overthrow of the USA, for the process of conquest has been ongoing for decades.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, March 29, 2011 at 5:13 am Link to this comment
The US ceased to exist the day GWBush was inaugurated as POTUS. Gary Mont
While I recognize the overall concept to be valid, I would like to respectfully disagree with the
statement as presented.
Prior to the end of WWII, when the NAZI-types in Germany and the NAZI-types in the USGOV planned the
first iteration of Operation Paper Clip, the end was initiated. Perhaps the election of GHWBushJr
in 2000 was the consummation. However, the creation of the C.I.A., after the dissolution of the OSS,
was one of several increments. That GHWBushSr was secretive “chairman of the board” of the C.I.A.
during its initial years of world-wide destruction, and the acquisition of its black-budget, is
basic.
The violating of the directive of U.S. President, Harry Truman, falsifying the histories of the
initial 200 German (NAZI) scientists, and issuing falsified U.S. Passports to them, constitutes
treason. Establishing Werner von Braun as head scientist of NASA, and Hubertus Strughold as chief
of space medicine was criminal.
Responsible for the deaths of 2,000 Polish-prisoner, slave-laborers at the rocket works in
Peenemuende, von Braun deserved to be tried with colleagues at the Nuremburg Trials. Hubertus
Strughold (MD) murdered many prisoners in the Dachau Stalag with his experiments. The goal of his
experiments was the death of the victim. Strughold´s valuable, statistical measure was the length
of time a victim could “hold out” until death. This criminal was elevated to “Chief of Space
Medicine,” NASA, by the criminals who overtook control of the U.S.ofA. Strughold deserved to be
tried with colleagues in the Nuremburg Trials, for his inhuman murder of Jewish and other folk in
the Dachau Stalag.
Elevating Strughold to “American hero” status in NASA reflects the degeneration of the leadership of
NASA and the un-American “shadow” personages who pull their strings.
In Brownsville, Texas in 1985, seventeen members of an alleged hippie-family were murdered and
skinned. During this three day period, GHWBushJr disappeared. Upon returning, he could remember
nothing about the three days. Texas authority investigated his possible involvement, until GHWBushSr
smothered Texas authority.
Right. Texas authority permitted itself to be smothered, by GHWBushSr.
What happened to the skins of these seventeen (17) persons? Using human skin to make lamp-shades was
a favorite of some NAZI-types in the 1940s. Should you see a thicker, pieced lamp-shade with two
darker spots about four inches apart, you are looking at the nipples of a former person.
When JFKSr began to implement plans to extinguish the C.I.A. and translate the Federal Reserve into
Report thisthe property of the U.S. Citizenry, the shadow government of the U.S.A. showed its hand. One mafia-
triangulator confessed in detail to his role in the JFKSr assassination. The degeneration of the
U.S.ofA. plots inversely with the rise in power of the GHWBushSr entourage, among other factors.
By tedmurphy41, March 29, 2011 at 5:00 am Link to this comment
‘Innocent until proven guilty’ seems to have gone out of the window with the treatment of this individual.
Report thisLets say that he is found innocent; he will have spent time in a jail for no good reason - this cannot be classed as fair and humane treatment of someone who has not be tried in a Court of Law, military or civilian.
It’s about time America made a real effort to bring their legal system into the 21st.Century.
By Gary Mont, March 29, 2011 at 12:33 am Link to this comment
GM: You are of course assuming that votes have an effect on who is selected for POTUS.
PatrickHenry: “You have a point. The illusion of a democracy can be confusing, consider the lack of a paper trail in our voting system.”
Removing the vote as a means of publicly choosing candidates for public office was done in broad daylight and was as simple as installing machines to tally the votes which could be controlled via remote input.
Both Bush terms used this method to fix the numbers.
The theft of the office of POTUS was obvious to anyone who was not in denial and was bald-faced proof that the “free press” and televised media was completely under corporate military control.
The US ceased to exist the day GWBush was inaugurated as POTUS.
Report thisBy Gary Mont, March 29, 2011 at 12:10 am Link to this comment
JohnM: “Yes you are half right - they do use waterboarding to train our troops - it’s a close as they can get to torture without torturing them.
—-
When Waterboarding is used to teach troops how to bear up under torture by an enemy, the troops are reasonably certain that their trainers will insure that no real damage is done to them during the training exercise.
The process of Waterboarding is still classified as a method of “torture” however, because it still causes the fear and anxiety it was designed to induce, even in those who know they are not life-threatened.
This is why the procedure is used - because even when you know the torturers are good friends, the process itself causes the human body to react in the predictable manner.
To claim that the procedure is not torture merely because its used as a training tool is silly. When the enemy uses the exact same procedure on captured soldiers it is absolutely considered to be torture.
If the procedure was not torture, it would be useless as a tool for a training exercise to prepare troops for the use of the same method of torture by enemy captors.
However, as I’m certain you will go to your grave repeating this fable to any who will listen, I’ll drop the topic at this point.
==========================
JohnM: “But I’ll give you this much - IF you can find ONE person that was incarcerated at the Hanoi Hilton to say that waterboarding is torture I’ll call it
torture. The one I know says it’s not and he’s the
most qualified person I know to determine what is and
isn’t torture.”
—-
I’m not positive, but it appears you want me to find someone who was Waterboard-tortured in Hanoi, who will state here in this blog that he considers the waterboarding used on him to have induced fear and anxiety, and then you will admit that waterboarding is torture. Otherwise you will continue to claim it is not torture because you know a person who was indeed waterboarded, and he claims that the procedure was not torture - that it was indeed, a not unpleasant experience causing him no anxiety or fear… and you believe this person is an absolute expert on what is and what is not torture.
Never mind. My mistake.
I thought I was communicating with an adult.
This sort of silliness is beyond my comprehension and an obvious waste of everyone’s time.
If you’re a republican, you may/will use this post as proof of my capitulation on this subject.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 28, 2011 at 7:39 pm Link to this comment
John M,
Don’t confuse voluntary waterboarding at a SERE school for class instruction as opposed to involuntary waterboarding.
SERE school waterboarding is vastly different than that practiced on suspected terrorists.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/sere_training_and_torture/
Report thisBy Chas Nemo, March 28, 2011 at 7:31 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What absolute BS! There are strict rules for the handling of prisoners at Quantico. My cousin was a guard at that same brig.
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Report thisBy sallysense, March 28, 2011 at 6:58 pm Link to this comment
(and furthermore…
military misbehavior that kills civilians has already taken hundreds of lives…
whereas exposing the truth of that misbehavior hasn’t killed any civilians…
nor anyone else either for that matter)...
Report thisBy diamond, March 28, 2011 at 6:56 pm Link to this comment
“Waterboarding, is not torture, sorry, we have been
doing it as part of the training of our military for
years. As for what we got from doing it. There are
several people who were located and are in Guantanamo
because of information obtained by using it. A good
thing btw. If it took dropping water in Khalid Sheikh
Mohammeds mouth 200 times I’m all for it Christopher
Hitchens aside.”
Ask yourself a simple question John M: if it wasn’t torture why would they bother doing it? Wouldn’t it be simpler just to give the poor bastard they’re holding down a shower instead? Obviously it is torture and that’s why they do it. If it wasn’t torture they wouldn’t bother. They do it to get a person to tell them what they want to hear and to do that they have to inflict pain and suffering on that person. Therefore, obviously, it is in fact torture. As for it being used as part of training, you know as well as I do that that training is about teaching people who might be captured and yes, TORTURED, not to reveal any damaging information. In other words it is about teaching them to resist TORTURE. How this makes waterboarding not torture is beyond me.
Your comparison with Robert Hanssen is a false equivalence. Hanssen sold secrets to the Russians for $1.4 million in cash and diamonds. Manning, if indeed he even did what is alleged, did it for idealistic reasons and revealed war crimes to the American public: war crimes they have a right to know about. And in fact any soldier who witnesses war crimes is required by law to report them. Manning, we’re told, did report them and was told to forget it and shut up. He then allegedly reported them to the American people and a global audience via Wikileaks. There is therefore no comparison between Manning and Hanssen whatsoever. Hanssen was not driven by his conscience to do what he did, he was driven by greed and revealed secrets to a foreign power. Manning revealed war crimes committed by Americans to Americans because he felt duty bound to do so.
Nice try but no cigar.
Report thisBy John M, March 28, 2011 at 6:33 pm Link to this comment
PatrickHenry
from your link
While the technique has been used in various forms
for centuries, the term water board appeared in
public in a 1976 UPI report: “A Navy spokesman
admitted use of the ‘water board’ torture . . . to
‘convince each trainee that he won’t be able to
physically resist what an enemy would do to him.’”
In April 2009, the U.S. Department of Defense refused
Report thisto say whether waterboarding is still used for
training (e.g., SERE) purposes.[12][20]
By John M, March 28, 2011 at 6:22 pm Link to this comment
RayLan
If your quoting political science theseus from
someone that intends to go to law school that’s nice
I’ll quote the aclu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=Acd4BnOhaFA&feature=fvwrel
just shows he should get an F - cause he’s wrong
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 28, 2011 at 6:15 pm Link to this comment
You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding
Manning didn’t give up any sources as most of this info was diplomatic chatter, not technical intel.
He most likely did embarass the hell out of Hillary and her crew and for that I would like to buy him a drink.
The second amendment protects me and my neighborhood, state and country and the jingoistic phrases like “freedom is not free” and “we have to be over there so they don’t come over here” is a pile of steaming crap.
The only phrase I believe in and has held true for me over the years is “The more you sweat in peace the less you bleed in war”
You have a point. The illusion of a democracy can be confusing, consider the lack of a paper trail in our voting system.
Report thisBy sallysense, March 28, 2011 at 6:15 pm Link to this comment
hiya again john m… article 1 section 8… of our u.s. constitution…
training the militia according to the disciplines prescribed by congress…
... (and not ineptly training the militia in misbehavior…
... according to the whims of self-serving military cronies)...
soldiers also swear to defend the u.s. constitution by following lawful orders…
... which includes reporting unlawful war activities…
... that by law must be made known…
... and that by law must be fully investigated and not be ignored…
(military procedures must also adhere to certain rules and regulations concerning deployments and re-deployments…
... and not create ways to bypass those rules and regulations)...
and the basis of our intelligence agencies are indeed rooted in…
... rich powerful wall street lawyers…
... military cronies…
... and corporate big shots including oil’s…
and one of the first oil companies involved in the roots of u.s. intelligence was standard oil…
... whose top personnel was deeply involved in u.s. intelligence groups in the 1940’s…
... standard oil had split into 34 companies…
... one being standard oil of california (socal)...
... which changed its name to chevron…
... which acquired unocal (union oil company of california)...
... whose top advisor was also a top contact for the cia and on the cia payroll in the 2000’s…
(even full circle you can’t take oil companies out of the picture)...
so why are you trying to make these facts look like some kinda joke ?...
aren’t you aware of the truth ?...
Report thisBy John M, March 28, 2011 at 6:06 pm Link to this comment
RayLan
Oh yeah here is another guy that took a bunch of
classified information and gave it to someone and is
spending time in solitary at ADX Everybody’s favorite
FBI traitor, Robert Hannsen.
http://www.westword.com/slideshow/supermax-a-look-at-
colorados-most-infamous-residents-12551/5/
“Solitary confinement as used in the American
penitentiary system is a violation of several major
international human rights treaties.”
As for all the supposed violations of international
law regarding solitary confinement. what was the
result of the hearing saying it was? Again just
authoritative expert’s” and their opinion no facts..
Gary Mont
Yes you are half right - they do use waterboarding
to train our troops - it’s a close as they can get to
torture without torturing them.
But I’ll give you this much - IF you can find ONE
Report thisperson that was incarcerated at the Hanoi Hilton to
say that waterboarding is torture I’ll call it
torture. The one I know says it’s not and he’s the
most qualified person I know to determine what is and
isn’t torture.
By RayLan, March 28, 2011 at 5:54 pm Link to this comment
@John M
“So IF and I again say IF manning is guilty, he’s just
as much a psychotic as McVeigh and Kaczynski. “
“So recheck your source. As for manning -
Releasing the names of US informants probably put
more people in danger “
This what you call facts? I provided the source for the paper I quoted.
http://students.washington.edu/wulr/Winter_2010/Hansen-King_Human_Rights_and_Solitary_Confinement.pdf
University of Washington Undergraduate Law Review
by
* Josh Hansen is a senior pursuing dual degrees in Political Science and Law, Societies, and Justice and plans to attend law school in the fall. This paper was his Political Science Honors thesis and was advised by Professor Jamie Mayerfeld. Josh is actively involved in the community through internships at the Defender’s Association and Senator Maria Cantwell’s office.
These are good credentials. What are yours?
The paper says,
“This monitoring is primarily administrative and done by prison administrators. “
This implies they have already been admitted into solitary - due process is up to the administrators. Check your reading—- and your logic.
And here is a quote from a professional psychiatrist
Report thisBy John M, March 28, 2011 at 5:30 pm Link to this comment
RayLan recheck your facts: “They decide which
prisoners get transferred to solitary confinement and
when they can leave. In effect the administrators
serve as judge, jury, and executioner; they answer to
no higher authority in regards to their decisions to
place prisoners in or release them from solitary
confinement.”
Don’t know where you got it but the FACT is EVERY
cell in the supermax where psychotic criminals like
McVeigh or Kaczynski are is a solitary confinement
cell. So the administrators have no say as to which
prisoners are placed in or released from solitary
confinment - The ENTIRE prison is solitary
confinement. So recheck your source. As for manning -
Releasing the names of US informants probably put
more people in danger than McVeigh and Kaczynski
killed together.
So IF and I again say IF manning is guilty, he’s just
Report thisas much a psychotic as McVeigh and Kaczynski.
By John M, March 28, 2011 at 5:19 pm Link to this comment
“By drbhelthi, March 28 at 8:18 pm Link to this
comment
And no - I don’t work for the CIA. There are bad
people out there that want to harm you I am thankful
every day for people that put their lives on the line
to protect this country. = John M.
Well, John M., that reads real good. Do you really
think that “there are bad people out there” ?
Can you provide the name of one person, one single
person, who is putting ones life on the line to
“protect” this country? Unless one reads in,
“protect from honesty and truthfulness and generally,
altruism.””
Report thisYes I really think there are bad people out there.
just like Mohamed Atta. And I won’t name one. I’ll
include everyone that has volunteered to put a US
military uniform every day and taken an oath to go
into harms way when called. I’ll also include the
people in city uniform that walk into places like the
world trade center trying to help only to have a
building fall on them. Wouldn’t you?
By RayLan, March 28, 2011 at 5:10 pm Link to this comment
John M
“You need to check your facts “
Facts about what? The article isn’t about Terry Nichols.
Comparing Manning to violent psychotic criminals like McVeigh or Kaczynski is not only off topic it proves nothing since it based on an invalid comparison.
Nor does it prove the legitimacy of his treatment.
Please study
So this treatment is by definition unusual, reserved for the worst criminals and it is also considered a form of punishment, which you justify as protection.
@John M
Report this“As for your “authoritative expert’s” and their
opinions - which one of them examined Bradley
exactly?”
By berniem, March 28, 2011 at 4:52 pm Link to this comment
I am truly ashamed to be an American and have been such for many years, each moreso than the previous as I witness the ever increasing degradation of what this nation is supposed to represent. Mr. Manning sits in a hell of torture while bush, cheney, et. al., and even obama are guilty of heinous crimes in the world. I wonder who leaked those candid “family” pix from Afghan. obtained by “der Spiegel”? Think they’ll try to blame those on Brad too? Seems to me, if we’re prosecuting soldiers for exposing criminality in the ranks, shouldn’t we be looking at the military leadership that has allowed these atrocities to occur? Remember, Yamashita and Kesselring were hanged for war crimes after WWII for the actions of their underlings. Hasn’t the glorious Petraeus also overseen such behavior? Perhaps eventually this imperialist cesspool will succomb to another form of coalition which will conduct it’s own Nuermberg and bring our noble and exalted leaders to justice not only for their crimes but also for their brazen hypocrisy! FREE BRADLEY MANNING!!!!!
Report thisBy Gary Mont, March 28, 2011 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment
John M: “And although you think it is cavalier I’ll say it again since it has not seemed to sink in.
Waterboarding is and has been used for years in
training our military. And although I found it extremely unpleasant, the 20 mile march and obstacle
Course weren’t torture either.
——
Methinks yer being just a tad facetious here John.
(Not a personal attack - merely an observation)
The reason that Waterboarding is and has been used for years in training our military, is to prepare the soldiers to survive similar methods of TORTURE without breaking, should they be captured by the enemy of the day.
If the enemy uses Waterboarding on captured US soldiers as a means of extracting information and confessions, I’d think it would be considered as toture by those captured soldiers.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, March 28, 2011 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment
And no - I don’t work for the CIA. There are bad people out there that want to harm you I am thankful every day for people that put their lives on the line to protect this country. = John M.
Well, John M., that reads real good. Do you really think that “there are bad people out there” ?
Can you provide the name of one person, one single person, who is putting ones life on the line to “protect” this country? Unless one reads in, “protect from honesty and truthfulness and generally, altruism.”
Report thisBy John M, March 28, 2011 at 4:11 pm Link to this comment
“By RayLan, March 28 at 5:58 pm Link to this comment
John M
” I don’t see
you crying for any of them.
” You’re dodging the critical facts.
They aren’t the topic of discussion here. If they
have been given due process without the months of
solitary and psychological abuse Bradley is being
subjected to, it is not an issue. Protection?
Protection from what? And who exactly is being
protected? The corrupt administration no doubt.
You’re very cavalier about what constitutes torture
in the face of all authoritative expert opinion.”
RayLan You need to check your facts - Terry
Nichols was held FOR YEARS before he came to trial.
The bombing occurred April 19, 1995 Timothy McVeigh
was tried first and put to death June 11, 2001.
Nichols trial ended December 24, 1997 he was held for
over 2 years.
Ted Kaczynski was arrested on April 3, 1996 On
January 7, 1998, Kaczynski attempted to hang himself.
Kaczynski was able to avoid the death penalty by
pleading guilty to all the government’s charges, on
January 22, 1998.
This is not unusual at all
As for protection, protection from other inmates for
one, pedophiles don’t do well in general prison
populations they become targets. People thought to be
traitors don’t do well in military general
populations they also tend to become targets. He’s
also on a suicide watch which is why he was issued
special sleeping gear.
As for your “authoritative expert’s” and their
opinions - which one of them examined Bradley
exactly? I’m not “dodging the “critical facts” as you
say, I’m addressing them. You seem to be either
making them up or confusing OPINION for facts.
btw if you feel the administration is corrupt you lay
that one at the feet of Eric Holder and Obama since
they ARE the administration.
And although you think it is cavalier I’ll say it
Report thisagain since it has not seemed to sink in.
Waterboarding is and has been used for years in
training our military. And although I found it extremely unpleasant, the 20 mile march and obstacle
Course weren’t torture either.
By Gary Mont, March 28, 2011 at 3:03 pm Link to this comment
By PatrickHenry: “If Obama doesn’t show some leadership soon and continues to allow this torture against Manning it will lose him votes next election.”
You are of course assuming that votes have an effect on who is selected for POTUS.
Do you really believe that a corporate controlled government, capable of the sort of atrocities the US has perpetrated in the last ten years alone, would allow a simple thing like the Vote to interfere with their plans of global profiteering??
The only reason Obama was selected for the office was the fact that the Billionaires Club knew that nobody was going to vote Republican after Bush. Obama is simply a republcian in democrats pants. He will follow the orders he receives from wall street just as diligently as Bush did.
Do you actually believe that such an organization as the US Incorporated Federal Government would allow anyone uncontrolled and honest to exist in their ranks and threaten their master’s plans of global conquest??
Pfc. Bradley Manning’s treatment is specifically designed to send a message to anyone else on the inside who has considered speaking out or disclosing corporate secrets.
When the facists tire of torturing Pfc. Bradley Manning, they will “suicide” him. They will not allow him to walk free ever again. This is the reason for his current designation as suicide-prone.
Report thisBy RayLan, March 28, 2011 at 1:58 pm Link to this comment
John M
Report this” I don’t see
you crying for any of them.
“
You’re dodging the critical facts.
They aren’t the topic of discussion here. If they have been given due process without the months of solitary and psychological abuse Bradley is being subjected to, it is not an issue. Protection? Protection from what? And who exactly is being protected? The corrupt administration no doubt.
You’re very cavalier about what constitutes torture in the face of all authoritative expert opinion.
By John M, March 28, 2011 at 1:22 pm Link to this comment
diamond - So the fascist gang took over after the
civil war? Interesting. But you are right that
neither Obama or Holder were alive at this time. But
they are “alive” and “in charge” now so take it up
with them.
Waterboarding, is not torture, sorry, we have been
doing it as part of the training of our military for
years. As for what we got from doing it. There are
several people who were located and are in Guantanamo
because of information obtained by using it. A good
thing btw. If it took dropping water in Khalid Sheikh
Mohammeds mouth 200 times I’m all for it Christopher
Hitchens aside.
Torture is not lawful true. I have a friend that
spent time in the Hanoi Hilton he can explain torture
to a t Christopher Hitchens could try any of those methods and would probably change his miind about
being waterboarded. 3 hots and a cot is not on the
list.
Again why do people like you resort to personal
attacks when you disagree with someone’s point of
view? The name calling on this forum is almost as
entertaining as it is childish.
And no - I don’t work for the CIA. There are bad
people out there that want to harm you I am thankful
every day for people that put their lives on the line
to protect this country.
RayLan - Solitary confinement is NOT torture -
sorry it’s not. It has been used for centuries for various purposes. Examples include Protection from
other prisoners and control of the prison population
among others. What you may want to look at is the
super max where Terry Nichols, Unabomber Ted
Kaczynski, shoe bomber Richard Reid are all held in
solitary confinement, let out of their cells 1 hour
out of every 24 with no contact with other prisoners.
It’s the way EVERY prisoner in the place is held so
no it’s not unusual, not at all. & btw I don’t see
you crying for any of them.
sallysense - makes no sense. Manning is no
whistleblower. IF he is found guilty he should hang
just as the Rosenbergs did.
“pfc bradley manning is brave enough to stand up
against unconstitutional criminal activities being
carried out in the middle east!...”
Which unconstitutional activities do you refer to?
And I would love for you to point out the big oil ceo
that is part of the “basis” of US intelligence..
“and saddening is the basis of our u.s. intelligence
agencies…
... that are rooted in rich powerful wall street
lawyers!...
... and military cronies!...
... and top personnel of big corporations such as
oil’s!...”
What a laugh
Report thisBy sallysense, March 28, 2011 at 11:48 am Link to this comment
hiya john m’n'all… it saddens me to see folks who don’t know any better call for harm to be done to whistleblowers who are exposing the truth!...
and saddening is the basis of our u.s. intelligence agencies…
... that are rooted in rich powerful wall street lawyers!...
... and military cronies!...
... and top personnel of big corporations such as oil’s!...
... whose best interests and ulterior motives are self-serving business deals…
....... and not truth and human decency!...
....... nor our country’s and people’s well-being!...
....... (just look around our country and overseas and see the facts yourself)...
pfc bradley manning is brave enough to stand up against unconstitutional criminal activities being carried out in the middle east!...
... unconstitutional criminal activities done under the name of our government…
... unconstitutional criminal activities under the eyes of intelligence agencies…
(after unconstitutional criminal activities were reported and ignored by some u.s. higher-ups)...
pfc bradley manning is more of an american patriot than all those higher-ups put together!...
so where do the loyalties lie for those who call for harm to be done to pfc manning?...
... (where is this lynch mob mentality coming from ?)...
....... the cover-up manipulators who pass it on from brain to brain among the masses ?...
....... or those who don’t know any better and just believe what the cover-up manipulators say ?...
....... or somewhere else ?...
best wishes’n'ways for today to dawn on!...
http://www.bradleymanning.org
Report thisBy RayLan, March 28, 2011 at 6:48 am Link to this comment
More facts for John M
Solitary confinement IS torture. You might get a better grip on that reality if you were locked up alone for months.
Please study the following:
Report thisBy RayLan, March 28, 2011 at 6:38 am Link to this comment
@John M
Report thisWell your version of the facts needs some improvement.
By diamond, March 28, 2011 at 2:05 am Link to this comment
diamond Again I apologize for the spelling feature on
my ipod - at times I type one thing and it replaces
words and I can see it sends you into a snit. My bad.
Solitary confinement is not unusual look it up. As
for America being taken over by a fascist gang take
that up with Obama and Eric Holder. Is it lawful YES.
is it just YES. And I don’t have to change places
with him to justify being let out to exercise 1 hour
a day sleeping for 8 more and spending 15 in a cell
while still being in contact with his defense team.
As for waterboarding well I don’t agree. We’ve been
doing it to our own pilots for years they call it
training. Also if you think Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
is a so-called ‘terrorists’ he tried to plead guilty
to the military tribunal but Holder wanted a show
trial. He IS a terrorist.”
1. The fascist gang took America over after the Civil War when Northern and Southern capitalists decided to patch up their differences and enslave both black AND white workers and make an America that suited their needs and their insatiable appetite for war and profit. I don’t believe either Obama or Holder were alive at this time.
2. I don’t give a shit what they call waterboarding, it’s torture. Christopher Hitchens, chief apologist for the Iraq war and any amount of torture soon changed his mind after he volunteered to be waterboarded. After, he declared it was torture, as any sensible person would have known without actually having to have it done to them.
3. Torture is not lawful. Ronald Reagan signed the Convention Against Torture in the eighties and America is bound by it. Solitary confinement and forced nudity were used in Abu Ghraib precisely because they were and are torture so your argument that they are not torture is idiotic. These are known techniques for breaking and dehumanizing people so that you can get them to say and do whatever you want.
4. The only thing I need to know about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is that he was waterboarded 200 times or more. If, at the end of that, he was prepared to admit he was a terrorist, Mickey Mouse, the man in the moon, Marcel Marceau or Johhny Depp could anyone really be surprised? The point is that any confessions he made and any information he gave were obtained by torture and are therefore tortured evidence and inadmissible, which is why none of the CIA/Pentagon psychos want to have any of the people they have in Guantanamo put on trial in a normal court. Most if not all of their evidence is tortured evidence. Having perfected their techniques on Muslims they assure us are terrorists, with no evidence to back it up, they are now only too happy to use them on their own soldiers.
5. You say all of this is just: I say you’re one sandwich short of a picnic and totally lack empathy. You don’t happen to work for the CIA, do you?
Report thisBy John M, March 27, 2011 at 8:32 pm Link to this comment
PatrickHenry not forgetting at all - I keep referencing
Report thisthe fact that he has not yet been found guilty meaning
there is a presumption of innocence. The trial will
settle matters.
By gerard, March 27, 2011 at 7:10 pm Link to this comment
California Ray: Thanks for the well-written suggested sample letter to Bradley Manning.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 27, 2011 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment
John M,
Lets not forget Manning has not been to trial yet.
All this ‘punishment’ is presumptive.
Fortunately we all have had a glimpse of what was released and none of it rose to the level of grave damage. Much of it should not have been classified at all.
Manning was a PFC, his officer in charge should be sharing the cell next to him.
Report thisBy John M, March 27, 2011 at 5:14 pm Link to this comment
gerard. Sorry my ipod didn’t meet your spelling
demands my bad. Sorry no I don’t consider it un-American
to think about the safety of a prisoner. Solitary means
he doesn’t have a room mate or free time with other
prisoners. He is not cut off from human contact. As
for the constitution the term is Cruel and unusual
not Cruel or unusual.
RayLan You may see it as glib but please get your
facts straight. He is allowed out daily to exercise.
And you KNOW what type of bed he has and you are sure
it’s not proper? Right. Btw familiarize yourself with
the trial process this is not a long time and if it
were his lawyers can argue in court that his right to
a speedy trial is being denied - no such motion has
been filed that I know of. Or are you saying his
representation is incompetent?
PatrickHenry I hope he is found not guilty also as
long as he is not guilty. If he is guilty I still
hope for the death sentence - he can join the
Rosenbergs.
diamond Again I apologize for the spelling feature on
my ipod - at times I type one thing and it replaces
words and I can see it sends you into a snit. My bad.
Solitary confinement is not unusual look it up. As
for America being taken over by a fascist gang take
that up with Obama and Eric Holder. Is it lawful YES.
is it just YES. And I don’t have to change places
with him to justify being let out to exercise 1 hour
a day sleeping for 8 more and spending 15 in a cell
while still being in contact with his defense team.
As for waterboarding well I don’t agree. We’ve been
doing it to our own pilots for years they call it
training. Also if you think Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
is a so-called ‘terrorists’ he tried to plead guilty
to the military tribunal but Holder wanted a show
trial. He IS a terrorist.
To RayLan and diamond I’ve found throughout my life
Report thisthat people with limited intelligence and myopic
views always resort to using words like moron and
simple-minded to personally attack people they
disagree with.
By robertbeal, March 27, 2011 at 4:38 pm Link to this comment
Thank you, Marjorie, for representing your profession’s responsibility to stand up to institutional illegalities.
My Senator Wyden says he is going to “look into” the Manning case—but that because he is on the intelligence committee he can’t say anything substantive about his position on it.
Readers, what do your Senators have to say about it?
Report thisBy gerard, March 27, 2011 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment
John M: FYI, “Crewel” is a kind of embroidery.
Report thisAccording to what studies have been done, solitary confinement usually causes people to suffer from various mental and physical symptoms they did not have before they were thus confined. Believe it or not, for human beings, positive social contact is a
fundamental need, like food.
If prisoners have to be put in solitary confinement to protect them from other prisoners, there is something extremely wrong with that prison.
There are no circumstances giving some people the right to rob other people of mental and physical health. In your statement you show some dangerous signs of being “un-American.” I would ask you to please refer to (what is left of) the Constitution.
By California Ray, March 27, 2011 at 12:10 pm Link to this comment
[date], 2011¶Pfc. Bradley E. Manning¬C/O Quantico Base Brig¬Marine Corps Base
Report thisQuantico¬3247 Elrod Avenue¬Quantico, VA 22134-5114¶Dear Private
Manning:¶In these difficult times, please remember that you are in our
thoughts.¶Although you are being detained under harsh conditions, please try to
keep your spirits up.¶Face each hour bravely, because you are not
forgotten.¶Sincerely,¬[your name]
By California Ray, March 27, 2011 at 11:44 am Link to this comment
Make that “Dear Private Manning,” not “Dear Mr. Manning.”
Report thisBy California Ray, March 27, 2011 at 11:42 am Link to this comment
[date], 2011
Pfc. Bradley E. Manning
C/O Quantico Base Brig
Marine Corps Base Quantico
3247 Elrod Avenue
Quantico, VA 22134-5114
Dear Mr. Manning:
In these difficult times, please remember that you are in our thoughts.
Although you are being detained under harsh conditions, please try to keep your spirits up.
Face each hour bravely, because you are not forgotten.
Sincerely,
Very truly yours,
[your name]
Report thiscc: ________, Member of Congress
By RayLan, March 27, 2011 at 11:32 am Link to this comment
@John M
“Solitary confinement is not torture in some
cases it’s not even crewel it protects targets from
other prisoners. It’s sure not unusual. “
Well that was glib. Having no activities,not being allowed out to exercise and not being given a proper bed is one of the severest punishments, when it is extended for such a long period of time, especially without being formally tried. If you did it to a dog you would be investigated by the SPCA.
It is not constitutionally normal, because it violates due process.
Report thisYou have a right to your opinion, regardless of how inhuman and simple-minded.
By PatrickHenry, March 27, 2011 at 10:04 am Link to this comment
John M,
I for one hope Manning is tried before a civilian court and found non guilty.
He can then cash in on his celebrity and make so money on his suffering.
Whatever his fate he will be remembered, whereas you won’t.
Report thisBy ChaviztaKing, March 27, 2011 at 2:34 am Link to this comment
Dear friends, what are you complaining about? Living in the USA is already a torture, an ecomomic terrrorist torture of paying like 10 different bills, where most families are taxed to death, billed to death and not to mention the moral, verbal and emotional terrorism, rape and abuse that american citizens feel on a daily basis by the police, the courts, and worst of all the lies of CNN, FOX news, Univision and the media. Remember that being lied to is a form of moral and psychological torture.
Americans are tortured every day, not physically but morally, economically and spiritually which is a lot worse than physical abuse and torture
Report this.
By ChaviztaKing, March 27, 2011 at 2:28 am Link to this comment
diamond: The USA has been torturing and killing people since 1600, go to http://www.brianwillson.com to find out about the dark truths of US Imperialism, and how USA was founded as an Imperialist Military Nazi Empire with the ideology of ethnic cleansing and genocide of the British Empire and ancient fascist empires. We have to be realist and accept this painful truth that the USA was founded as a racist, fascist killer empire by default in 1776
Report this.
By gerard, March 26, 2011 at 10:36 pm Link to this comment
And speaking of “complicity in torture,” see Glenn Greenwald’s latest at Salon.com on the latest Obama appointment.
Report thisBy diamond, March 26, 2011 at 9:53 pm Link to this comment
“Personally if he is found guilty I hope he is put to
death. Solitary confinement is not torture in some
cases it’s not even crewel it protects targets from
other prisoners. It’s sure not unusual.”
Am I surprised that a shallow, unjust, ignorant moron like you can’t spell ‘cruel’? No. I’m not. And if you think Manning’s treatment is normal that only proves how moronic you really are. In a third world dictatorship his treatment would be normal so are you telling me you’ve finally faced the fact that America is turning into one? America has been taken over by a fascist gang and this is how they treat anyone they perceive to be their enemy. Is it lawful, is it just? No, it’s not. And if you think it’s all so fine and dandy why don’t you change places with him just to satisfy your mind that it’s not torture? What’s the matter? Cat got your tongue? And while you’re at it let them waterboard you 200 times like they did to various so called ‘terrorists’ so we can all decide if that’s torture or not. If they did it to you, you would confess that you had sex with a goat, or anything else they wanted you to say. Which is the point and why tortured evidence is not permitted in a real court of law. But don’t worry your poor little head about that, you might strain your brain.
Report thisBy John M, March 26, 2011 at 5:04 pm Link to this comment
Personally if he is found guilty I hope he is put to
Report thisdeath. Solitary confinement is not torture in some
cases it’s not even crewel it protects targets from
other prisoners. It’s sure not unusual.
By gerard, March 26, 2011 at 4:31 pm Link to this comment
Too many psychologists in the employ of the Defense Department selling “learned helplessness” and other “refined” torture techniques. Another sad result of “privatization of prisons.” More bang for the buck?
As to “justice for all”—the United States now reeks of hypocrisy and legalized crime.
Report thisBy Wildeye, March 26, 2011 at 1:16 pm Link to this comment
Torture is the moral and ethical equivalent of Pandora’s Box. Only without the hope.
Report thisBy California Ray, March 26, 2011 at 12:10 pm Link to this comment
First, we started unapologetically torturing suspected terrorists. Now we’re
Report thisunapologetically torturing service members suspected of leaking classified
information to the news media. Where will we draw the line and stop torturing
suspected wrongdoers?
By PatrickHenry, March 26, 2011 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment
Its scheduled, the next round of protests in Washington.
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/462/358/Day_of_Rage_Scheduled_in_Washington_D.C._for_June_30,_2011.html
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 26, 2011 at 11:22 am Link to this comment
If Obama doesn’t show some leadership soon and continues to allow this torture against Manning it will lose him votes next election.
Report thisBy art guerrilla, March 26, 2011 at 11:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
it is very simple, most of the kampers here know:
we are not a democracy (or republic, if you are an
asshat fundie literalist douchebag), we are a
korporatocracy in service to the 1-10% of the deserving
masters of the universe…
it
is
that
simple
any/all solutions have to overthrow this system, or
NOTHING of substance will change…
THE SYSTEM IS THE PROBLEM, WE MUST OVERTHROW THE SYSTEM
WHICH OPPRESSES US ALL…
there is no ‘law’ (not for li’l peeps), these is no
‘justice’, there is no ‘equity’, there is no ‘fairness’,
there is no ‘morality’, there is no ‘sanity’...
your social contract has been revoked, and we are
NOTHING to the powers that be, UNLESS/UNTIL we walk like
an egyptian… (with a pitchfork, hhh)
think about this for a second: you KNOW that ‘your’
(sic) kongresskritters and saint obama would not
hesitate ONE FEMTOSECOND to have ‘our’ military shoot us
down in the streets, NO MATTER HOW PEACEFUL WE ARE…
think about that, kampers…
and then tell me how amerika is that great shining
exemplar to mankind…
art guerrilla
Report thisaka ann archy
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
eof
By Jim Yell, March 26, 2011 at 10:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It is truely disturbing, although not surprise to observe how easily our elected and appointed officials have been successful in making our Bill of Rights completely meaningless.
Their so called state secrets are all hiding things that they should not have indulged in in the first place. In fact they are criminals and yet unpunished. What is going on here is the old saying “kill the messenger”—ignore the crime.
Bradly Manning should not be in prison, at lest he should be out on bail. If there was any right in the world he would be free and the bastards in the government who have dismissed so easily his rights should be in the docket.
As for Obama and his clearly continuing lack of character and standards, shame on him. And, the Republicans who engineer all of these crimes, the Republican Presidents we have had who believe that they are ordained to ignore the laws, well they are the most criminal of all. But, wait, this is a democracy and they have support of many people. What do they say?
Report thisBy Psychobabbler, March 26, 2011 at 12:07 am Link to this comment
This book will be very helpful for me.
Report thisBy SteveL, March 25, 2011 at 11:20 pm Link to this comment
Let’s see the people joining the military take an oath to uphold the constitution
Report thisand the politicians take an oath to ignore it?
By diamond, March 25, 2011 at 10:41 pm Link to this comment
A little story and then a question:
“The Mexican American war had barely begun the summer of 1846 when a writer, Henry David Thoreau who lived in Concord, Massachusetts refused to pay his Massachusetts poll tax denouncing the Mexican war. He was put in jail and spent the night there. His friends, without his consent, paid his tax and he was released. Two years later he gave a lecture ‘Resistance to Civil Government’ which was the printed as an essay, ‘Civil disobedience’.
His friend, and fellow writer Ralph Waldo Emerson, agreed but thought it futile to protest. When Emerson visited Thoreau in jail and asked, ‘What are you doing in there?” it was reported that Thoreau asked, “What are you doing out there?”
A question everyone should be asking themselves re Manning’s incarceration.
Another question.
If the fourteenth amendment states this-
“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges of immunities of citizens of the US; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny ANY person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law” how can it be that Manning can have his rights denied in so egregious a manner? Does being a soldier mean that you are not protected by the fourteenth amendment? If so, it seems a funny reward for serving your country and exposing war crimes.
Report this