LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 12, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

'Daily Show': Cold Busted, Sean Hannity

Testing Next Year's Lies Today

Gorbachev's Sermon on the Mount

The Man Who Put the Rainbow in 'The Wizard of Oz'

The Economy Looks Better in Paul Krugman's Neighborhood

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Where Does the Caving End?

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Appetite for Self-Destruction

Appetite for Self-Destruction

By Steve Knopper
$19.76

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Art Dealer Nabbed in $88 Million Swindle

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 26, 2009
De Niro Sr.
AP photo / Michel Spingler

Robert De Niro poses in 2005 next to an image of his father, artist Robert De Niro Sr., on a poster at La Piscine Museum in Roubaix, France. The actor is accusing art dealer Lawrence Salander, who was arrested Thursday, of stealing a dozen of his late father’s paintings in 2007.

It appears to be game over for Manhattan art dealer and gallery owner Lawrence Salander, who was arrested Thursday morning and accused of stealing $88 million from various art world players, institutions and investors, including tennis champ John McEnroe.

AP via Google News:

Lawrence B. Salander used the money to try to corner the Renaissance art market and to support an extravagant lifestyle that included private jet travel, a lavish party for his wife at New York’s Frick Collection museum, and the purchase and maintenance of his Manhattan town house and a 66-acre estate, Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said.

Morgenthau said Salander defrauded a total of 26 victims in two primary ways:

In one, he sold artwork not owned by him and kept the money. The district attorney said Salander sometimes sold a piece of art owned by someone else several times.

“Why sell it just once when you can sell it three times?” Morgenthau said.

Read more


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By CJ, March 29 at 11:12 pm #

On the other hand, “’Why sell it just once (to status-seekers, who don’t likely know a Courbet from a Gorky, or Maxim from Arshile, for that matter) when you can sell it three times (to same)?’”

Were Stuart Davis and Arshile Gorky (who was not an Abstract Expressionist anymore than was de Kooning. Both painters, by the way, far better than any Abstract Expressionist) still with us, I’m certain they’d appreciate exquisitely rich irony in connection with Salander’s sense of humor.

What swindle? Different than the one perpetrated when one forks over seriously hard-earned dough to view tedious tennis match performed by brats or same tired movie?

Mr. McEnroe might want to get back to abusing center “court” referees and linesmen while swatting at yellow balls with a “racket.” Mr. De Niro to shoot-em-ups.

See, it’s like this, John, and both Bobs, and you too, Earl…

Never mind, since what’s the use if/when you regard paintings first in commodity-fetish terms.

I suppose prosecution of Mr. Salander is wearily necessary if fine art made over course of human history is not to be emptied of only “value” that remains. And for the sake of painters—as opposed to fetish-minded dealers and collectors—trying to make paintings while scraping by performing lousy-paying jobs that none of aforementioned ever had to do for more than a year or two, if for that long.

Report this

By cyrena, March 29 at 10:18 pm #

I ditto Ed Harges.

But, if he had to steal from anybody, it couldn’t have happened to a more appropriate PRICK than John McEnroe.

Now THAT’s a cheerful thought.

Report this

By NYCartist, March 27 at 2:52 pm #

Artists have been cheated by galleries.  I just googled to refresh my memory.  Mark Rothko’s estate sued Marlborough Gallery and the case (with gallery owner convicted in 1983, after an 11 year case).  Irony is that many artists, most artists, do not have galleries representing them.  It is not that uncommon for galleries to cheat artists when reporting sales and giving the artist her/his “share” (ever shrinking).  Best to have a good contract.

Report this

By Ed Harges, March 26 at 8:23 pm #

This is simply an extreme example of the current economic disease of America: everyone wants to live like a millionaire for the rest of his or her life off the proceeds from selling a lucky-find asset, not through creating actual goods or providing actual services.

Everybody wants to sell a house (bought with borrowed money), or a painting, or something bought at a flea market for two dollars, and then retire in comfort and splendor at age 35. Nobody wants to work or produce anything.

It’s the “Antiques Road Show” economy.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Get any 3 books for $3.00 - Join Progressive Book Club todayChrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.