LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 19, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Krugman to Playboy: Economic Crisis 'Doesn't Have to Be Happening'

Déjà Pooh

When Iran Talks Back

The .0000063% Election

The Best, Most Revealing Reporting on the Foreclosure Crisis

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
The Lowdown on Fracking
The .0000063% Election

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Appetite for Self-Destruction

Appetite for Self-Destruction

By Steve Knopper
$19.76

Shi’ism and Social Protest

Shi’ism and Social Protest

by Juan Cole and Nikki Keddie
$30.60

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Filmmaker Turns His Eye on Surveillance Culture

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Mar 6, 2009
Eyeborg
eyeborg.com

Here’s looking at you, Toronto: Rob Spence’s visions may not be perfectly Web-optimized from the get-go, but he aims to make a statement all the same.

A Canadian filmmaker is combining his love of science fiction with his alarm over the ramped-up surveillance in his native Toronto by putting a specially fitted Web cam into his prosthetic eye—he lost his own in a childhood accident—and filming everything he sees.

Check out Rob Spence’s “Eyeborg Project” site here.

The Vancouver Sun:

With the help of an ocularist and an engineering professor (Steve Mann, so dedicated to pushing the edges of gadgetry he has earned the nickname “cyberman”), Mr. Spence has targeted February to have a stage-one prototype complete.

While the working model will be able to record video, it won’t be able to broadcast live and will likely be out of focus. Hopefully, this will be enough to apply for funding to proceed.

In the end, Mr. Spence’s intention is to use the footage recorded from his bionic eye to become a “media virus,” imagining himself as a mixture of George Orwell and the Bionic Man.

“There is so much surveillance going on. It is getting a little scary in Ontario. There are 11,000 new cameras going into Toronto, for example. And it’s funny because you tell people that and it’s like, ‘Yeah, uh huh, what’s for lunch today?’ It doesn’t land,” he said.

“It’s not that I even necessarily disagree with security cameras. It’s just where is the oversight? Who has control of this stuff ?”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.

Previous item: Norman Birnbaum on Susan Sontag

Next item: Recession Chic: Just Another Passing Fad?



Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By cctvdirect, October 26, 2011 at 11:41 pm Link to this comment

It is scary to read about the Canadian filmmaker who is putting a Web cam into his eye to record everything. I think there are many houses and buildings which have CCTV devices. I think many people are worried about who’s really watching them.

Report this

By wagonjak, March 13, 2009 at 11:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This give new meaning the the phrase I’ve got my eye on you!”

Report this

By wagonjak, March 12, 2009 at 12:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The phrase “I’ve got my eye on you!” takes on a whole new meaning!!!

Report this

By Sepharad, March 11, 2009 at 2:54 pm Link to this comment

Back in the early ‘70s, at the Freedom of Information Center we were appalled at the news that the Huntington (CA) PD had put up hundreds of surveillance cameras downtown. The Privacy Act was still in the works. Sen. Sam Irwin (SC) came to visit us one day, and said that the real potential for invasion of privacy was the computer. Since then, so much has happened on the surveillance front that I can’t believe a few hundred cameras upset the whole staff. Or that we thought Orwell’s “1984” had arrived when PDs across the country were considering hooking up the computers the better to share. That prompted a bunch or research re the privacy right which we discovered was not there (in Constitution) but implicit in the Declaration of Independence.

Eyeborg is not as threatening as it would’ve seemed then, but I guess it depends on whose eye socket it’s deployed in.

Report this

By sns, March 9, 2009 at 12:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

the nyc art scene is so facile and vapid these days as to devolve into utter irrelevancy. so given that this really is a great idea, relatively speaking wink

Report this

By NYCartist, March 8, 2009 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment

I view it as an art project combining art and science.  Art is problem solving, as is disability.  Consider where most of the research funding in our US society goes, (I don’t know about Canada.).

There’s a little machine running around on Mars, but you can’t get a wheelchair that rolls on sand, bumpy surface in NYC.  (Hugely expensive one exists that can go over a sidewalk curb without overturning.)

Ironically, surveillance funding and variations on drones, satellite imagery is way ahead of the EYEBORG project.  I do not fear EYEBORG concept, since there’s already cameras on well over ten thousand streets in lower Manhattan recording everyone/thing that passes.  That’s just a tip of the government (and some private) visual surveillance.  Remember the camera in midtown Manhattan last year that was inserted into the middle of a wall advertisement on Seventh Avenue (or so) near W. 57thSt.?  One of the militaries was doing a research project.

EYEBORG has potential for artists, disabled people, photograhers/videographers.  Great idea, bravo and thanks for bringing it to this forum.

Report this

By sns, March 7, 2009 at 4:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

not a terribly original idea actually.

see Bertrand Tavernier’s “La Mort en Direct” from 1980. At least the film has a story….

truthdig what’s wrong w/ your editorial?

Report this

By maq, March 7, 2009 at 5:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Made in Canada”.

I love it but can you imagine the President or Prime Minister, trying to ban all recording devices from a press conference.

That is if he was a reporter.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.