Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
July 25, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

The Unwomanly Face of War
The Life of Caliph Washington

Truthdig Bazaar

The Fall: A Novel

By Ryan Quinn


By Oliver Sacks

more items

Arts and Culture
Email this item Print this item

Limbaugh Selling ‘Club Gitmo’ Gear

Posted on Feb 11, 2009
Club Gitmo

The “Club Gitmo” T-shirts come in a variety of sizes ... including the hard-to-find XXXL.

Leave it to the proto-fascists to find a way to make money off torture, human rights abuses and the degradation of America’s image abroad. Rush Limbaugh has found it acceptable to sell “Club Gitmo” shirts on his Web site, complete with the image of a diving board and swimming pool (water + board, get it?).

To see some models of the T-shirts (earlier versions with only “Club Gitmo” on the left breast), check out Rush’s photo gallery.


ECONOMIC STIMULUS! President Obama has issued an executive order closing Club Gitmo within a year. So we have adjusted to changing economic times with a new Club Gitmo design. Club Gitmo: When America Was Safe.

New Club Gitmo slogan/logo with diving board and swimming pool (Water & Board) emblazoned on front and back. Available in Institutional Orange only in sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL & XXXXL!

Read more

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By Jim Effect, June 9, 2011 at 7:25 pm Link to this comment

I think someone should shut him down completely.  How can anyone even endorse anything that he’s doing??

Report this

By P. Anthony, May 22, 2009 at 5:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

These shirts are awesome! I’m buying 95 from Rush. I’m keeping 5 and giving 90 away to Senators who voted against funding the closing of this state of the art prison. Obama might be insane. Bush was better than this guy.

Report this

By Late but here, May 21, 2009 at 11:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I find it interesting that many of you lower yourself to his level by commenting on his weight or size.  You are really no better than he.

Report this

By jimbosan, February 19, 2009 at 6:24 pm Link to this comment

Shouldn’t Rush be in prison?  Thought he got busted for ilegally obtaining perscription drugs.  As far as I’m concerned he is just another junkie.

Report this

By Mary, February 19, 2009 at 3:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

From Tobias:
“4) I find it a bit hypocritical that “the left” condemns someone for running a prison (even though I am in support of it closing as well) and then rejoice for a president who legalises the killing of children through abortion. If you start arguing “it’s the woman’s choice”, you are really missing the point of hypocrisy I am speaking of.”

Leave it to someone on the right to turn the discussion into one that has to do with abortion. Off topic much?

Report this

By buster, February 18, 2009 at 8:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Joe said, “I would like to waterboard fatso and see what he thinks.”

Just be patient,Joe, and you may find out what he thinks without having to waste your own time waterboarding him.

According to Murphy’s Law, if it can happen, it will. In fatso’s case, loving the attention he gets from broadcasting hate and misinformation, disrespecting others and being able to now control the actions of the Repuglican Party, it absolutely could happen. I can hardly wait myself!

Report this

By outbox, February 18, 2009 at 11:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Yea.  “Noble” may be a stretch these days.

Report this

By robert puglia, February 18, 2009 at 8:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“The poor guy continues to grasp for attention at the expense of dishonoring civility and our noble nation”
and for as long as people give it to him will he get it. did you say noble?

Report this

By Outbox, February 17, 2009 at 7:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I visualize adolescent and pathetic Rush Limbaugh as eventually wearing the orange suit and hood he now laughingly trivializes.  The poor guy continues to grasp for attention at the expense of dishonoring civility and our noble nation.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, February 17, 2009 at 6:19 pm Link to this comment

“I find it a bit hypocritical that “the left” condemns someone for running a prison (even though I am in support of it closing as well) and then rejoice for a president who legalises the killing of children through abortion. If you start arguing “it’s the woman’s choice”, you are really missing the point of hypocrisy I am speaking of.”

That’s a good example that speaks to my point. Abortion is an issue that falls right into the category of being a difficult (but correct) idea to understand, battling a simplistic (but catchy) sentiment.

Abortion is actually about power. Conservatives want to extend federal power in a way that would forever destroy liberalism, along with the foundation of the America our forefathers built. It’s the conservative end game.

Jeb Bush tipped their hand in the Terry Schiavo incident years ago. During that episode, he proclaimed that *legally* ONLY the government could truly represent her interests, since she could not represent herself. Not her husband. Not her mother. The state. Bush. Bush claimed guardianship and was intent on getting the court to back him up. He didn’t quite get there, but he was headed there. Look it up.

Isn’t that contrary to what conservatives claim they want? Drown it in the bathtub and all?

I know it sounds conveniently inflammatory and borderline hysterical to say that a conservative victory on abortion would spell the end of the liberal experiment of America—not liberal in the sense of media talking heads, but liberal in the sense Thomas Jefferson envisioned it when he wrote the Declaration—but I believe it does. Which is why my blood boils when opponents start throwing around terms like “baby killers”.

Does the conservative rank-and-file really understand what they’d lose by winning?

The government elite want to declare the state to be the legal guardian of the unborn. Not the mother. Not the parents.

Think long and hard about that. What’s to make the state give up its rights after birth? Why wouldn’t the government dunderheads—you know, the people who makes laws and think the Universe is 6,000 years old and Alaska needs to secede and public bathrooms are a cool place to pick up guys—why wouldn’t they decide to maintain some… oh, residual guardianship over EVERYBODY afterward. You know, because they do so well at managing things.

You’d have no claim against that. See? Your guardian wouldn’t allow you to.

The end result is inevitable. No representation. No accountability. No “born with inalienable rights”. Only the rights the state thinks are best for you.

Like in Gitmo.

Report this

By Reubenesque, February 17, 2009 at 6:14 pm Link to this comment

Re:  By Tobias, February 17 at 2:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ m sorry.  Are you saying it is alright for rush to vomit his inflammatory vitriol and lies toward all he would have his listeners perceive as ‘enemies’ of America and not have it returned in kind?

My good man, how could you ever consider yourself fair and balanced.

We here at Truthdig are GREAT AMERICANS and PATRIOTS and we are FAIR AND BALANCED.  You believe in fairness and balance don’t you?

If you want to hear ‘hate speech’ toward Obama, go to a ‘conservative’ or ‘*type* of conservative’ board and find it in abundance.  You will even find considerable disparagement of Obama here if you look around a bit.

Until living, breathing innocent beings cease to be murdered through the guise of war and the death penalty, until innocent living beings no longer have the life slowly choked out of them through failed health care, justice, penal and economic systems let’s not talk of morality at all.  There exist sufficient mode already of terminating and truncating life.  All perfectly legal.

I say make a way for viable and opportune life first, then speak to the atrocity of not allowing the unborn the experience thereto.

Report this

By Kurt, February 17, 2009 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And as a follow up:

“My friends went to Club Gitmo
“and all I got was this crummy t-shirt”

Report this

By JFoster2k, February 17, 2009 at 3:49 pm Link to this comment

What a reprehensible, disgusting, self-serving, loathesome douche-nozzle!

Report this

By Tobias, February 17, 2009 at 3:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

1) I am not a supporter of Rush Limbaugh
2) I am a *type* of conservative
3) I am not a supporter of Obama
3) If I heard this kind of hate-speech directed toward Obama, even I would get a bit rankled. I absolutely cannot believe that any of you are “peaceful” people when you condone such hateful speech: whale size, comparing Rush’s IQ to a monkey, “can I test him” on a water-board, “fat head”, etc. I am at times a gullible person, but when people claim someone is a bad person, but use such language themselves, I absolutely refuse to believe any of you are kind peaceful people. If you are, prove it by your words and actions.
4) I find it a bit hypocritical that “the left” condemns someone for running a prison (even though I am in support of it closing as well) and then rejoice for a president who legalises the killing of children through abortion. If you start arguing “it’s the woman’s choice”, you are really missing the point of hypocrisy I am speaking of.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, February 17, 2009 at 5:46 am Link to this comment

Ribald, I think your comment was brilliant and I can agree with a lot of it. The way I interpret it, however, it seems to absolve liberalism for any blame, and I’m not sure about that.

In my opinion, another reason why radical right “thought” thrives is because of the tactic it uses of embracing patriotism and spirituality and profitability. High ideas simply expressed. It declares itself the “epitome of virtue” and “America first”.

You and I understand how disingenuous they are, but I think people like to embrace an ideal, even if only in concept, and I think liberals tend to be a little light in that regard. As our founding fathers no doubt realized, “America” is a hard thing to understand and in today’s rapid and simplistic media culture getting complex discussions going adds to the difficulty.

But somehow, I think, we need to find a broader voice that can urge justice (rightly) but provide a context (or maybe something else) for it that people can embrace. For example, I think a lot of people suspect Bush may be innocent of war crimes, so, they’d argue, why bother? As you point out, there’s a good reason to bother, but I don’t think Democratic “meekness” totally accounts for inaction.

Report this

By outbox, February 15, 2009 at 11:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Shirts colored with Agent Orange die and made of 100%-foxy cotton.

Report this

By Ribald, February 15, 2009 at 1:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Unfortunately, the dynamic of radical right-wing thought is one that thrives with opposition (and invents it when it doesn’t exist). The goal of Republicans today is, in no uncertain terms, to spark the umbrage and outrage of their political opposition. After all, how can you tell if you’re winning except by observing your enemy’s response (the rationalization given for war and corruption)?

  The only reason that this pattern of thought has any influence is that it is shared by some of the most powerful and corrupt individuals in the country, who see enemies around every corner and feel persecuted by the public for what they view as free speech (their right to rule).

  The only reason they are able to endorse blatant criminality is because their champions in government have been allowed to be criminal without consequence. Without consequences for breaking the law, they are free to refer to criminal acts as mere policy disputes.

  If we want the current incarnation of the Republican party to disappear, we can do no greater good than to investigate and aggressively prosecute their crimes. If we want it to return, we can do no greater harm than to shield the criminality of Democratic officials (the ones who were briefed on and supported the Republican crimes, for instance).

  This, in a nutshell, is why the Republican party will not change, and why the Democrats will continue to be only meek advocates of the public good.

Report this

By WilyTrax, February 15, 2009 at 9:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Republican leadership has work for a least two more years. That’s more than they can say for the people they “represent”. They should enjoy it.

Report this

By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, February 14, 2009 at 7:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I appreciate the luv, man.  So here’s a gem just for you.

“A man who has both feet planted firmly in the air can be safely called a liberal as opposed to the conservative, who has both feet firmly planted in his mouth.”
Jacques Barzun

Report this

By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, February 14, 2009 at 6:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)


Try Disney World.  I think Pluto and Goofey can identify with your reasoning powers.  TD is way over your head.

Report this

By Folktruther, February 14, 2009 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment

That Limbargher would publically endorse tortune indicates a turn to the right by the religious-political loonies, just as the Israeli voting population went to the right after the Gazan war and blockade, which is still continuing.  This irrationality is getting more sadistic as rank and file Gops begin to realize how they have been duped, and leave.

The right is getting more openly for death and despotism as the class inquality increases, the only way they have of continuing despotic power.  And Obama is catering to it, leading rank and file progressives to ally with this death culture.

It is essential that progressives reject this drivel out of hand, and oppose Obama from the left to prevent him with allying with it.  Comments like Marks are so absurd on their face that they should be largely ignored and our focus should be on the torture that Obama supports, continuing Bushite policies.

Report this

By Sodium, February 14, 2009 at 12:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The buffoonery of Rush Limbaugh and his ilks is so delusional beyond description. And to be delusional is utterly destructive. If he and his ilks are not neutralized and marginalized by treating them with their own medicines in constantly and steadily attacking progressives and liberals,America may fall in total confusion and entrobic social disorders for which there is no cure except bloody civil war or/and bloody revolution.

Neutralization is the profound answer to the buffoon fascism. Much more Progressive TV and Radio talk shows are needed.Keith Olbermann and Rachel Meddow of MSNBC,cable channel are both doing an outstanding job. Where are the rich/wealthy Progressives and liberals? Why not opening their wallet for a worthy cause to save America from its home-grown fascists?

Report this

By FiftyGigs, February 14, 2009 at 8:21 am Link to this comment

“Cinservative values are rooted in individual freedoms, responsibility, and achievement.”

Yes, I know that’s what Limbaugh and other conservative propagandists promote, and it’s a hoot to argue that conservatism is “really” what liberalism use to be. I’ve heard that all before. The problem is: it isn’t true.

Modern American conservative followers—the movement’s rank and file who provide the populist support without actually benefiting themselves from conservatism (did you get a bonus?)—think conservatism and liberalism are two sides of the same coin. They are not.

Conservative values are rooted in the authority of the state, the wealthy or business class, and the religious elite to proscribe and interpret laws and doctrine for the masses.

Contrarily, Liberalism promotes the simple value that all men are created equal, and governments are formed by the consent of the governed.

Conservatives call that socialism, because liberalism, while not directly addressing the same issues as conservatism, indirectly threatens it. For example, labor unions—the exercise of INDIVIDUAL freedom in forming a democratically managed group to represent a common interest—labor unions threaten the centralized power of the privileged business elite.

See how this goes? Next, you’ll argue that a business owner should be free to run his business. Sure. But then you’ll have to argue that EVERYBODY ELSE has to abide by… still with me? ... by the rule of one person, an elite.

Conservatism and liberalism really address different things, but they intersect sometimes. Under liberalism, theoretically, people can vote to be ruled by a dictator. But I don’t believe conservatism can never allow individualism.

Report this

By boggs, February 14, 2009 at 7:20 am Link to this comment

I find it extremely sad that the right wingers follow Limbaugh as kind of a trend setter for their thought.
He is a drug induced ranter of theories that are good only for the corporations who want no regulations.
They depend on us liberals to buy their rotten peanutbutter and tainted vegetables.

Report this

By Alex Freeman, February 13, 2009 at 11:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

WMark is a liar (That is not name calling BTW. A person who lies is a liar just a person who steal is a thief). Conservatives want to take away individual freedoms (freedom from warrantless wire tapping for instance). He does not believe Merriam-Webster’s definition of Fascism. He promotes a distortion of it. Mussolini railed against liberalism and sent his Black Shirts to kill socialists and liberals. Hitler had homosexuals killed in the Holocaust. They were members of the far right. The Fairness Doctrine enhances free speech and enjoyed the broad support of conservatives before Reagan overturned it:
We stand for the rights of ALLEGED terrorists because we need a fair justice system to avoid prosecuting the innocent. We don’t know if all of them are guilty, and torturing them only harms America’s image. Bush ignored a memo titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE USA and thus failed to keep us safe and showed what a keystone kop he was. I can see your mind is too closed for open debate, so bye.

Report this

By WMark, February 13, 2009 at 6:57 pm Link to this comment

Fiftygigs - I agree with the MW definition of fascism. See my previous posts, though on why the dems are the fascists, not conservatives. Cinservative values are rooted in individual freedoms, responsibility, and achievement. Liberal values are based on redistribution of wealth in order to equalize as many things as possible. Liberals want to squash free speech (the fairness doctrine).

Report this

By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, February 13, 2009 at 6:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)


I don’t need to dress you down any more.  My TD PATRIOT buddies can handle that just fine.


BTW that is my emoticon blowing you STRAWBERRIES!

That is all the civility you are due and all you will get from me.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, February 13, 2009 at 5:41 pm Link to this comment

Fascism, based on a real American institution—the Merriam-Webster dictionary with audio pronunciation—is:

“A political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”

That’s what Limbaugh cheered as Bush delivered, so, yes, conservatives are fascists.

Report this

By WMark, February 13, 2009 at 5:08 pm Link to this comment

Sagep - you and I agree on something - if you feel strongly about something, take a stand! But you can only debate the issues if there is openness to do so. Squelching someone else’s free speech isn’t the way, even if you disagree.  If it were that easy, we conservatives would have squashed the liberal media back when we had the power to do so. 

If you don’t like commentators like Rush, don’t tune him in.  Hell, I often turn off CNN for the same reason. It’s still a free country (or is that the idea…regulate freedom of speech?)

Report this

By WMark, February 13, 2009 at 4:21 pm Link to this comment

Behold- about your comments on Rush and how all we need to know is “hate, monger, and rich….”. I’ve never heard so many words of hatred towards conservatives until I read this board. And you accuse it of Rush?  Gee, it seems everyone wants to treat terrorists with “fairness” but anyone who disagrees with your political views is called names!  I would have thought that such an educated and open-minded bunch would have been able to accommodate more diverse viewpoints before resorting to name-calling.

By the way, like most other conservatives, I welcome an open debate and appreciate other points of view. 

Got nothin’ but love for ya’,


Report this

By sagep, February 13, 2009 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think the time has come that those of whose of us who have always been so tolorant of different views of others who don’t agree with us….take a different stand !!  Its time to stop tolorating intolorance.  Intolorant people Rush Limbaugh have no place in American societies or other free societies. Might have had a place in the 3rd Reich or something or Maybe in a zoo….but who would want to pay to keep such a horrible disgustng loudmouth slob…even in a zoo?

Report this

By WMark, February 13, 2009 at 3:37 pm Link to this comment

Behold—-Can’t believe you actually think we could release all Gitmo prisoners without consequence.  One of the ex-Gitmo “guests” has already taken a top Al Queda spot (I’ll get the link to the news if you need proof). 

Due process is something afforded to U.S. citizens, not to prisoners of war.  Their capture and interrogation prevents thousands of U.S. CIVILIAN deaths. 

I haven’t forgotten 9-11, and hope you are old enough to remember it.  Say what you want about Bush, but he kept us safe while others wanted to inialate all of us (and they still do.).

Report this

By Folktruther, February 13, 2009 at 2:50 pm Link to this comment

Damn right, BEHOLD.

Report this

By squeaky jones, February 13, 2009 at 1:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

When serious war crimes court for the whole Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Limbaugh, etc. families are on there way, I vote they all get to experience the Iron Maiden. Not the metal band; but, the Medieval torture device. Of course it will not be torture unless total organ failure occurs using the above creeps diffinition and of course just trying to get information to keep the world safe from the terrorists named above to name a few. squeaky.

Report this

By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, February 13, 2009 at 11:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And concerning Gitmo… all this ‘conservative’ blather about the luxury of Gitmo misses the point of being removed a half a world away, uncharged, subjected to cultural and religious degradation, lacking basic due process, and denied visitation of friends or family for years.

We ‘civilized’ humans cannot call ourselves humans until there is a uniform set of laws for all.

All the prisoners could be released from Gitmo today and we would never know the difference.  It is the policies of the U.S… degradation, torture, extraordinary rendition, human rights violation, quest for oil, cowardly drone strikes killing innocent civilians, general bullying, etc. that fuel the proliferate creation of terrorists.

In fact, the gesture of releasing all held ‘terrorists’ would be the Taliban’s and AlQeida’s worst propaganda nightmare.  They are already having to oppose the conception of Obama’s Muslim heritage by calling him a ‘house Negro’.

The terrorists, republican and so called ‘conservative’ dogma is much the same… you win, you win… you lose, you spin, you win.  It is forever win-win for them, given the lacking mental faculties of their sycophants.

Report this

By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, February 13, 2009 at 10:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)


We can argue about definitions until we are dead and gone.  And, by the way, that Wiki definition is much in dispute within their editorial facilities.

Pretty much, the only words one need look up concerning rush are ‘hate’, ‘monger’ and ‘rich’.

Report this

By WMark, February 13, 2009 at 9:13 am Link to this comment

Here’s a shortened version of my previous post:

1.  Conservative thinkers, like Rush but others as well, believe in a free exchange of ideas, open debates, and publicly-available information.  The Dems are the ones that shut doors on conference committes to prevent Republican representatives OR the public from participating.  Point in case: the stimulus bill.  This is fascism, conservative ideas are not. 

2.  Gitmo serves a purpose - so what will happen to captured terrorists and combatants without Gitmo?  Most likely, we’ll spend millions on a new facility inside the U.S. to replace it, and prisoners will be processed the same way (sans “waterboarding,” which only occurred three times at Gitmo.)

Report this

By WMark, February 13, 2009 at 8:51 am Link to this comment

I’m pretty sick of seeing the posters on this site constantly refer to conservative thinking as “fascism,” when the left-led government we have today is FAR closer to its definition.  From Wiki…

- “Fascism is an authoritarian nationalist ideology focused on solving economic, political, and social problems that its supporters see as causing national decline or decadence”  - and the left now believes they can impose any laws and any taxes on the people, without regard to the 58M Americans that voted AGAINST them.  Sounds pretty authoritarian to me.  The pressure from the left to be “politically correct” is another great example.  Nobody ever referred to “politically correct” as a conservative practice. 

-“Fascists aim to create a single-party state in which the government is led by a dictator who seeks unity by requiring individuals to subordinate self-interest to the collective interest of the nation or a race.” - The last thing our (Democratic) govt wants us to do is to be loyal to our own self-interest.  They want everyone to pony-up “for the good of the country,” despite its effect on our personal lives.  Individualism is just about prohibited.  Look at the “stimulus” bill - every man, woman, and child is about to take out a $3,000 loan and hand it over to Uncle Sam to spend on dozens of other programs that have nothing to do with enhancing productivity, fixing our banking system, or creating a market environment that can thrive so that real, sustainable jobs can be created.  Instead, they’ll get everyone on the federal payroll to create a class of people dependent on govt money. Add to that the push to legalize millions of ILLEGAL immigrants that will vote Democratic, and you have a perfect recipe for creating a single (Democratic) party system. 

- “Fascist movements oppose any ideology or political system that gives direct political power to people as individuals rather than as a collective through the state (liberalism, democracy, individualism); that is deemed detrimental to national identity and unity (class conflict, communism, internationalism, laissez-faire capitalism); that protects and enhances the power of “weak” people rather than promoting “strong” people.” - once again, a perfect picture of the Democratic party - make the weak feel powerful, and take from those who have followed the rules and been successful. 

As for Gitmo - (expecting plenty of comments on this one, so let’s hear it…)...waterboarding was done only three times at Gitmo, each time with the approval of the justice department.  If “we” don’t think this should be a legal interrogation technique, then “we” can make our own law against it, but it was done legally and it has stopped. 

More importantly, what are we going to do with the terrorists that we let go from Gitmo?  What are we going to use INSTEAD of Gitmo as a place to hold and interrogate terrorists and combatants?  I would LOVE to hear your ideas.

Report this

By Folktruther, February 12, 2009 at 7:09 pm Link to this comment

I wonder how many of those t-shirts he has sold.  Romney, a Gop candidate for president, stated publically as part of his campaign that their should be two Gitmos.  And Clinton was in favor of ‘obliterating’ Iran. 

What has developed in the US is a culture of death, and it has infected the population.  It makes the US the most dangerous, violent and barbaric power in the world.

Report this

By Jamie, February 12, 2009 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dave: What’s truly sad is that there are Americans like you who either admire a dirtbag like Limbaugh and/or think what the US did and still does at “Gitmo” is humorous and worthy of advertising by way of tee-shirts. Instead of feeling sadness over the well-deserved insults Limbaugh deliberately generates with his ugly, hateful rants, why don’t you try asking yourself why you find the torturing of human beings at “Gitmo” (some of whom are undoubtedly innocent), and Limbaugh’s promotion of it, so damn amusing.  If you’re capable of being honest with yourself, you may not like the answer. Let us hope so anyway—at least for the sake of any children you may have or bring into this world.

Report this

By joe, February 12, 2009 at 3:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

i would like to waterboard fatso and see what he thinks.

Report this

By coloradokarl, February 12, 2009 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment

Rush will twist up his Karma to a point of no return very soon.

Report this

By Dave, February 12, 2009 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have already ordered mine.

When you guys write these things (head won’t fit through the neck hole, world-renowned douchebag, good place to send overweight drug addicts—like Limbaugh!, etc etc etc), do you really think you are witty?

sad sad sad

Report this

By robert puglia, February 12, 2009 at 11:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

leave it to purportedly fair minded, civilized people to further promote those they allege to be proto-fascists.
he is a lout and a rank dissembler and you’re giving him free advertising. ann coulter, sean hannity, nancy pfotenhauer are rotten, too. they deserve equal time which you will no doubt allow them.
it isn’t just jerks who are jerks but also jerk enablers. 
truthdig seems to be enamored of the simp rush limbaugh. your unfailing notice of him and his bullshit make you more like him than not like him. figure it out.

Report this
photoshock's avatar

By photoshock, February 12, 2009 at 7:56 am Link to this comment

re: Mark-the unregistered commenter,  You have been reading the books and doing the work. For only a person who is in the know, is of the understanding that there is nothing proto-fascist about the fascists that inhabited the government under the shrub.
Rush and his ilk, and I do like to go ilk hunting, are worst than the fascists under Mussolini and Hitler, for they knew what they were doing was not democracy,
These people who ascribe to the positions of the herd of neo-conservatism have yet to figure out that there is nothing in their manifesto that talks, walks or quacks like a duck. I am not ashamed to say that I saw the light and became a progressive and almost overnight, when I became homeless and none of my so-called friends would even take my calls.
Thank G-d, that there are still pockets of people out
there who have lived long enough to remember that we are our brother’s keeper and we are one.
Not the herd of Rush and his ilk, they could care less if the country goes to hell in a hand basket, they are doing fine.

Report this

By Psaltseller, February 11, 2009 at 11:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Loved London’s little bit of jingoism. “Yes, we should all be real worried about Europe’s opinion of us since the entire continent doesn’t have a single functioning army on it and they’ve been running to us like pussies for 100 years for us to defend them.”

You do realize we stopped including our NATO-nation allies in our war games because we kept getting our heads handed to us. The sneaky little devils would attack after 1900, when our off-duty guys were mostly too drunk or stoned to reinforce the skeleton night crews. If you weren’t there, you don’t know.

For that matter, in just how much of the 1914-1918 war did we participate? And then there were the jokes about the Nation of the Deaf, since it took half a decade between Britain sounding the alarm and America doing much of anything in the last war.

But just go ahead and diss the Europeans whenever you want. Then see how many Euros can be purchased for a dollar, and remember they started out at par.

Report this

By P. T., February 11, 2009 at 8:35 pm Link to this comment

Club Gitmo would be a good place to send overweight drug addicts—like Limbaugh!

Report this

By Big B, February 11, 2009 at 7:49 pm Link to this comment

I have not looked at Limbaugh’s web site (ever) but I would be a little interested in finding out if I could get Rush’s vacation t-shirt, “Someone went to Puerto Rico to buy viagra and sodomize 12 year old boys and all I got was this lousy t-shirt, and the clap, of course.”

Report this

By nickysin, February 11, 2009 at 7:31 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

only one response to Rush Limbaugh, see Bill Hicks on YouTube!

nuff said…

Report this

By Debra Istvanik-Strotman, February 11, 2009 at 6:41 pm Link to this comment

Limbaugh is the lowest form of human making money from peope just like him.

Someone should mraket a tshirt with Limbarugh being waterboarded saying “Line up to waterboard Rush,” 3 tries for a $1.00.” What a fat pig!

Report this

By 1twenty1, February 11, 2009 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Doubt that rush could wear any of his pull over wear.

Couldn’t get his fat head through the neck hole.

Report this

By Larry Linn, February 11, 2009 at 4:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Will Rush Limball sell me a waterboard? Can I test it on him? will he tell the truth?

Report this

By 1twenty1, February 11, 2009 at 4:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Looked at the site.  I bet Bailey from TN named his monkey Rush.  How do you fatten up a monkey and teach him how to smoke stogies? 

Look out, Rush, your IQ was just eclipsed!

Report this

By nino, February 11, 2009 at 4:39 pm Link to this comment

funny that proto-fascists are the ones that need XXL, XXXL and “the hard-to-find XXXXL”

Report this

By London, February 11, 2009 at 4:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes, we should all be real worried about Europe’s opinion of us since the entire continent doesn’t have a single functioning army on it and they’ve been running to us like pussies for 100 years for us to defend them.

Report this

By wagonjak, February 11, 2009 at 3:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Personal Failure…apparently they’ve made a dozen shirts especially for Rush that are XXXXXXXXX whale size!

Report this

By Personal Failure, February 11, 2009 at 2:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

So, they don’t have Rush’s size?

Report this

By Mark, February 11, 2009 at 2:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Please stop giving Limbaugh and his ilk the benefit of the doubt.

There’s nothing “proto-” about it.

It’s fascism, plain and simple.

Can’t recall who said it but it’s not an ad hominem attack if it’s true.

Report this

By richard east, February 11, 2009 at 2:16 pm Link to this comment

“world-renowned douchebag”

...couldn’t say it better myself.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook