Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned On Climate Change

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

The Making of a Global Security State

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned On Climate Change
The Making of a Global Security State



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Arts and Culture

Christian Appy on ‘Mekong Diaries’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 16, 2009
book cover

By Christian G. Appy

    “We lost the war because the Vietnamese just flat out beat us. And we lost the war because we didn’t understand that they were poets.” I was offered this Delphic explanation of American defeat in Vietnam by Larry Heinemann, a novelist who survived some of the war’s fiercest fighting in 1967 and 1968 as a soldier with the 25th Infantry Division near the Cambodian border in Tay Ninh province. The inspiration for his enigmatic comment came years later when he revisited Vietnam and met a professor of literature whose wartime service included lectures on American writers to Vietnamese troops as they traveled down the Ho Chi Minh Trail. Professor Lien told the young soldiers about Walt Whitman and Ernest Hemingway and William Faulkner.

    “Now what Vietnamese literature did the American military teach to you?” Lien asked in all sincerity. “I laughed so hard I almost squirted beer up my nose,” Heinemann recalls. He explained that American military training did not place a premium on the prose or poetry of any culture, even its own.

 

book cover

 

Mekong Diaries

 

By Sherry Buchanan

 

University Of Chicago Press, 264 pages

 

Buy the book

 

    But how could poetry, or any kind of art, help explain one of history’s most astonishing victories? I think what Heinemann meant was that the Communist-led cause in Vietnam mobilized not just bodies, but souls. How else to explain the will of millions of Vietnamese to fight for years under unimaginably difficult conditions—under the most massive bombing in world history, in jungle camps and tunnels, on a diet of rice and cassava, for year after year after year. It was common for people to fight for five or even 10 years if they lived long enough. I met one man who was away from home for 29 years fighting the French and then the Americans. When he finally returned, his mother insisted that he show her a familiar mole on the back of his head to confirm that he was, in fact, her son.

    To maintain morale, the government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) deployed hundreds of artists, writers, actors, singers, photographers, puppeteers and dancers. These members of the “Literature and Arts” section of the military (Van Nghe) did not just visit combat troops, or lecture to them; they lived with them, moved with them, camped with them, and sometimes fought along with them. They were military artists in residence, only the residence was a war zone, not a campus. When combat was imminent they might move to the rear, but, when necessary, they picked up arms and fought, and died.

    What a contrast to the morale-boosting efforts of the U.S. military. In his memoir, commander William Westmoreland, sounding very much like a corporate personnel manager, claimed that the morale of his troops remained high because they had a one-year tour of duty, a one-week R & R in an Asian capital like Bangkok, well-stocked PXs and other “creature comforts.” That, and an occasional USO show featuring Bob Hope and young starlets like Joey Heatherton and Ann-Margret, pretty much exhausted the command’s prescription for morale. Of course, the strongest morale is built on an enduring commitment to a clear and convincing underlying moral purpose, a cause, and the military was no more successful than U.S. policymakers at identifying a cause in Vietnam that could sustain the faith of its citizens and its soldiers.

Ho Chi Minh City Fine Arts Museum
A detail of “Guerrilla Warfare: A Surprise Attack,” 1966. To see several other images from “Mekong Diaries,” click here (PDF file).

Sherry Buchanan’s new book, “Mekong Diaries: Viet Cong Drawings & Stories, 1964-1975,” gives us a stunning look at some of the wartime art produced by the Vietnamese soldier-artists who served in the “American War” to drive out the U.S., topple the American-backed government in Saigon and reunite Vietnam. The book’s title is a bit misleading. This is not a collection of diaries. There are a few scraps of moving wartime correspondence and some wartime poems by Nguyen Duy, but this is, primarily, a collection of watercolors and sketches created during the war by soldier-artists.

    To provide some context for the images, Buchanan has included several introductory essays and reminiscences from each of the 10 featured artists. The essays are written by Buchanan, a former features editor at The Wall Street Journal who now works independently on Asian art and culture, and two of her collaborators—Nam Nguyen (a Vietnamese-American who left Vietnam as a refugee in 1975 at age 7), and Nguyen Toan Thi, a war artist who was, until 2005, the director of the Ho Chi Minh City Fine Arts Museum.   

    Most of the featured artists were born in southern Vietnam, and a number of them served in the war of resistance to French rule (1946-1954)—the First Indochina War—as well as the American War. After the Geneva Accords divided Vietnam in 1954, they “regrouped” to the North, where they received training at the Hanoi School of Fine Arts; a few trained in the Soviet Union as well. As the United States escalated its military intervention to prevent the collapse of the government it had backed in South Vietnam since 1954, Hanoi began to send artists on the four-month trip down the Ho Chi Minh Trail to the southern “Front.” During the course of the American War, about 100 soldier-artists served with units of the People’s Liberation Armed Forces (the southern guerrillas known to Americans as the Viet Cong) and units of the People’s Army of Vietnam (the North Vietnamese army). Sixty-two of them died in the war. 

1   2   3   NEXT PAGE >>>

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Moore May Face Lawsuit Over Iraq Photo

Next item: Celeb-Fest 2009 Continues in Washington



New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Robert, January 21, 2009 at 6:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I read the book review posted on this site on Friday.  I immediately went out and bought the book at my local bookstore.  I finished the book within 2 days.  I was thoroughly impressed by the emotions that spilled out the pages by those who experienced this war.  The stories behind the painting/drawings were heartfelt.  It just shows that war is as psycological as it is physical.  It also goes to show the human toll war takes on everyone involved - as well as their family members. I will read this book again because it tells a story from a perspective that is usually ignored.

Report this

By xyzaffair, January 19, 2009 at 1:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I get really angry when I see the intransigence of Vietnamese refugees in the U.S. who violently protest the slightest acknowledgement of the current government in Vietnam.  Protesters in Orange County, CA, the largest Vietnamese community outside Vietnam, vandalized an art exhibit that displayed the red star flag and a repair shop whose owner displayed a portrait of Ho Chih Minh.  They claim such displays stir up painful memories.  What about those still in Vietnam who had family members killed by the mindless U.S. carpet bombings?  There are two sides to the issue, and these protesters should take the time to examine both.

Report this

By James E Taylor, January 18, 2009 at 11:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The art and science is a true indicator of
man humanity, much more so than teaching man to kill
one another.  One of the major problem in our schools,
are the lack of teaching the spiritual virtues to the
students.  Growing up in the thirties and forties we never had the kinds of problems you see from the schools today because, student not only respected their teachers, but each other also.  Each school day were open with all students and teachers beginning the day with devotions and songs.  How much more to have someone to recite a poem.

Report this

By since1492, January 18, 2009 at 5:55 am Link to this comment

We lost because we didn’t know anything about them, or their history, let alone their poetry and art work. We were given USO shows more for distraction than for inspiration.
Hoa binh

Report this

By JayRoot22, January 17, 2009 at 5:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fascinating piece giving further insight into the differences in approach to morale uplift and maintenance between the Viet Cong and their G.I. counterparts during the “American War” in Vietnam. It’s clear that Sherry Buchanan’s book will shed new light on the conflict and our huge gap in understanding our so-called “enemies” during that war. For that reason alone, “Mekong Diaries” would appear to be a valuable resource, but as fascinating as this piece is, I am a bit baffled by the “official” nomenclature that Christian Appy uses for the southern guerrillas usually known as “Viet Cong” (which, I believe is simply Vietnamese for “Vietnamese Communist”)as the People’s Liberation Armed Forces. I had always thought that they were officially known as the National Liberation Front for Vietnam. Or was that assumption incorrect all along?

Report this

By rav, January 16, 2009 at 9:48 am Link to this comment

A unique and real’ view. There is a beautiful ugliness to war, from this perspective. I havn’t persued this view of war and I think this article has sparked my need to look further as with your comment. Thank you

I will look to aquire the Mekong Diaries’ I think will be a good start.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, January 16, 2009 at 7:28 am Link to this comment


“How else to explain the will of millions of Vietnamese to fight for years?”

That’s normal territorial-trooping-primate behavior.  If the Vietnamese invaded the U.S., the Americans would have resisted for years.  In fact, the Vietnamese actually did fight smaller nations or tribes within their borders who didn’t care to be assimilated for years.  Humans are not very different from chimpanzees and baboons in this area.

Poetry may shore up the spirits of the warriors, but it doesn’t guarantee victory—the Japanese forces in World War 2 seem to have been fond of it.  Germans and Americans (the preponderance of whom descend from Germanic tribes) seem to prefer their verse with music.  Did “Lili Marlene” win the war, or lose it?

Report this

By rav, January 16, 2009 at 6:18 am Link to this comment

There is alway’s some new thing to learn about war and culture, this in particular is unique. Artistry and poetry grafted into the vietnamese soldiers fields of war for morall and balance. 
  I must say we Americans are a bit off the mark when it comes to morality and Balance in war.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.