LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 10, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Elections Are for Suckers

Embracing 'Enough'

'Crazy Horse': A Study in Erotic Abstraction

The Great Carbon Bubble

Judge Puts Heart Into Prop. 8 Ruling

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Embracing ‘Enough’

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Head Cases

Head Cases

By Michael Paul Mason
$16.50

more items

 
Arts and Culture

Get Milk

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Nov 26, 2008
filminfocus.com

By Sheerly Avni

First things first. Gus Van Sant’s “Milk” is a movie to be thankful for. Go see it, tonight if you can, and in a crowded theater. See it because as a grass-roots activist and California’s first openly gay elected official, Harvey Milk led and won the fight to defeat Proposition 6, an anti-gay measure as bigoted in its own time as Proposition 8 is today. Or because it features one of our best actors at his least actorly—in his most winning performance since “Fast Times at Ridgemont High.”  Or because on Nov. 4, civil rights took a step back on the very day it leaped forward—though Milk would have known how to use that defeat to galvanize a movement. See it because Milk is a legend in his community and in San Francisco but he hasn’t yet been written into the history of American civil rights at large, where he belongs.

Hell, see it because it’s going to take all Wednesday night to defrost the turkey, anyway, and how often does a movie about a martyred hero leave you wanting to buy tinted prescription glasses and dance in the street?

Related Links

 

“Milk” does not exactly paint Dan White as a homophobe or racist—the scenes in which White rants against a gay demonstration and fights to keep a facility for troubled young people out of his district tell only half the story. Before White, a Vietnam veteran and former crusader for racial justice in his own Fire Department, came completely unhinged, he was supportive of gay San Francisco.  SF Weekly has the backstory.

 

Screenwriter Dustin Lance Black, writer on HBO’s “Big Love,” was raised in the Mormon church. Last week he told Terry Gross how Harvey Milk inspired him to come out, and he offers some astute insights into church leaders’ possible motivations for backing Proposition 8.

 

Get Out of the Bars and Into the Streets on this audio walking tour of Milk’s San Francisco.

 

Rob Epstein, who won an Oscar for “The Times of Harvey Milk,” talks about his current project, a feature film about Allen Ginsberg starring James Franco.

 

 

If you live in a city or town with a gay neighborhood large enough for its own theater, see it there. After the credits roll—and yes, you’ll stay through the credits, weeping and clapping—take advantage of the fact that for a minute “Milk” will have done for that crowd what Harvey Milk did for the Castro district: help transform a group of isolated individuals into a community. Scan that community for cute strangers. Smile, strike up a conversation, and then invite them back to your place to share some cheap merlot and watch the documentary “The Times of Harvey Milk,” by Robert Epstein (see sidebar to watch online)—because these two films belong together.

Epstein’s Oscar-winning documentary, which he began working on before Milk’s assassination, is a marvelously constructed narrative of both Milk’s achievements and the political context of civil rights in the late 1970s. And now it’s also worth seeing just for the pleasure of appreciating how well Penn captures the real life politician’s gestures, charm and infectious humor, and how well Van Sant and his screenwriter, Dustin Lance Black, capture the ebullience of those first heady days of pre-AIDS freedom in the Castro.

Almost as impressive are James Franco as Scott Smith, Milk’s longtime boyfriend, and Josh Brolin—who specializes in bad guy pathos—as ally-turned-assassin Dan White. Diego Luna’s twitchy performance as an unhinged lover is an embarrassing distraction, and Van Sant and Black spend a bit too much time on Milk’s private life, at the expense of the much more gripping drama taking place back of Milk’s camera store, where he and his ad-hoc advisory council plotted out his campaign strategies. 

Which is why—inspired, tired and a little drunk—you and your new best friends might now take a look around your living room, and admit that it’s not nearly as shabby as the collection of beat-up couches and overflowing ashtrays that Milk and his staff used to plan some of most important campaigns in the history of American civil rights.

Sean Penn’s spectacular laugh lines inspire, but it’s Epstein’s film that blocks out Milk’s strategies and political philosophy in ways that Hollywood can only touch on, what with the need to make time for Love, Loss, Moments of Quiet Reckoning, and extraneous flashbacks to scenes that that were extraneous to begin with. Epstein instead explores Milk’s effect on some of the labor leaders he worked with, his almost spooky mutual love affair with news cameras, his insistence on the need for minorities to find strength by working together, and the darker days of unrest following White’s unjustly light sentencing, which culminated in a riot that did a million dollars worth of damage to City Hall and landed almost 200 San Franciscans in the hospital.

“The Times of Harvey Milk” is in essence a riveting primer in effective grass-roots activism. Epstein’s cameras followed Milk’s supporters straight into hostile neighborhoods where they reached out to voters one by one. Today, Milk would have sought out newly influential minorities through churches, pamphleteering and precinct walking. And we can be sure he’d have condemned intimidation campaigns against individuals who supported Prop. 8 and the recent name-calling by angry demonstrators directed at African-Americans on the streets of Los Angeles. Instead, he’d have preached a relentless optimism, the kind that rallies masses and empowers individuals.

“I know you cannot live on hope alone,” he told an enthusiastic crowd on the steps of City Hall 30 years ago. “But without it, life is not worth living. And you … and you … and you … gotta give ‘em hope.”

Hope is Milk’s legacy, and action his imperative. And if in the course of following both, you also brought some cute strangers home, Harvey Milk would not disapprove.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.

Previous item: Hollywood's Closet Still Closed for Business

Next item: Richard Ellis on 'Diagnosis: Mercury'



Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By mapol, November 17, 2011 at 9:53 pm Link to this comment

“Milk” was a good movie, which I saw twice.  Movies such as this are necessary in
order to shake up an ignorant and/or indifferent public to the problems of
prejudice in our society against people who’re perceived as “different”, which still
goes on even to this day.

Report this

By nhs, November 29, 2008 at 4:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m looking forward to the movie. It’s Sad I live in an area without a gay neighborhood.  But if it’s anything like “Brokeback Mountain” the theaters will be packed to the hilt anyway. grin

By the way, pam, the Indians in the old Westerns were “bad” because they were a “white caricature” of a proud and very diverse people. Those “Indian” would have been just as “bad” if played by 100% Native Americans.

Report this

By just wondering, November 28, 2008 at 9:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

So gay “actors” can’t play convincing straight parts, and straight “actors” can’t play convincing gay parts???

Report this

By GrammaConcept, November 26, 2008 at 2:52 pm Link to this comment

Great review, too!....’-)...

Thank you to Sheerly Avni..

Report this

By GrammaConcept, November 26, 2008 at 2:50 pm Link to this comment

At times, over many years, I have had similar responses to the works,
and the lives, of both Sean Penn and Bob Dylan…..
Something like a mother
with bright and creative children feels…
at times, annoyed by their excesses or their absurdities, but mostly….
so proud of them, and so grateful for their penetrating efforts and creative honesty, that I sometimes weep…

This movie is such an occasion…

Strive on, Sean…‘mama’ loves you…

Report this

By hippy pam, November 26, 2008 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

Remember the old WESTERNS???....Where they had ??whoever???play the INDIANS????Before Graham Greene and Wes Studi???FAKE INDIANS who did not know HOW TO ACT LIKE INDIANS????This is the same thing….And it needs to change…..it is akin to having a white person in grease paint play the part of a black person….a joke….a comedy….

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.