To bad we didn’t get a good shot of the set, still not worth 1/2 a million but better than seeing some childs arm or body torn to pieces by 7.62 rounds.

BruSays sums it up nicely.

Amerika will not rest until it achieves Total Victory in the Global War on Nipples!

Hey, what about all those “Girls Gone Wild” tapes/DVDs they advertise all the time? They may not show nipples on TV, they blank that part out, but they leave little else to the imagination. And the ones with 2 females getting it on are totally offensive, but they haven’t been banned either.

There are more important things that could and should be looked into, but it is just easier for them to go after something that happened years ago.

That we’re even having this conversation on Janet Jackson’s breast speaks volumes about our infantile society. We have some serious issues to face.

1. Sexually Repressed. As a nation, we haven’t yet shaken our Victorian-Age/Salem-Witch-Hunt outlook on sex. Sex is the forbidden fruit. It’s tantalizing but it’s the work of Satan. We may pretend we’re liberated but we’re still tied to our backward legacy.

2. Hypocrisy. As a nation, we’re hypocrites. Oh, we can talk about sex (just about every sitcom on TV is dripping with it) but we can’t SHOW it. We can make jokes about it and even run prime-time ads promoting sexual prowess (“if your erection lasts longer than 4 hours, consult with your health professional.”), but we don’t dare SHOW that erection.

3. Our nation’s priorities are screwed up. We’ve killed 4.200 of our soldiers and god knows how many thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens in an illegal war that didn’t have to happen. We have millions going to bed hungry, we have record deficits, record home foreclosures, a shattered health care system, crumbling infrastructure, and we’re worried about the impact a wardrobe malfunction will have on our children?

Right now AOL has a lead story on Obama skipping out on church and going to the gym instead. Here’s a man who from the start was against the killing of thousands of troops and Iraqi citizens and people are questioning his morals because he hasn’t attended church? Geeezzz, peeps. It’s the 18th century all over again.

When you turn on your TV to see a ball game but you see a nipple instead, that’s not good.  Who knows what you might see on any kind of program if you see a nipple on football.  Why, you might see a dick on that Crystal Catheadral show on Sunday am.

Look folks, we need censorship on TV.  There are a lot of irresponsible people out there, not to mention incompetent materials and prop handlers whose ineptness might make it possible for us to see all kinds of lewd things on TV.

As for me, I can’t get my mind around why two people have to be standing up there titillating millions of people with sex-suggestive noise, anyway.  Why does music, if you want to call it music, have to be so steeped in sex?  If you have to have a half-time show, why does it have to be sex?  How does it go from football to sex?  If you want to have sex, then why beat around the fucking bush?  Just have the gd sex and get it over with.  They’re up there “singing” about sex and even showing a nipple, the audience knows it’s about sex, but you can’t have the sex.  Just a nipple.  What are we, masochists?  What’s wrong with us?  Don’t we have anything at all better to do with our time?

You listen to pop music and it’s all about how he hurt her, she dumped him, he doesn’t know when he’s going to get laid again, she’s full of heart-ache, he’s getting it on with someone else, etc., etc., and effing etc.  We’re unbelieveably single-minded. 

Then, the effing FCC can’t let it go. 

Hey, FCC, stop the food ads on TV that are making our kids fat and sick!!!!!!!

By Fadel Abdallah, November 23 at 10:02 am

No body sees the obvious and this jj nipple flash is just a small look at the influence of the religious freak’s fears and prejudices in how someone else thinks all people should live. It has huge and devestating effects on this country and plays a big part in the backward motion our country takes in educating the people.
I would say that, no people just can’t be allowed to walk around with no clothes displaying and causing a constant state of arousal, because being sex, and I think this would be funny, just about everybody would be performing sex and nothing else would get done. But, trying to cover up sexual displays has its own way of creating adverse conditions.
In short, this is an extreme waste of the FCC’s time and the people’s also. There are way too many important and real issues for the FCC to tackle and as I mentioned in an earlier comment here, breaking up the conservative media hold on the msm, where most people get their information(tv, radio, newspapers, magazines), is their number one priority in my eyes. This ownership by just 4 or 5 owners is totally undemocratic for this republic.

When I thought I heard it all, I keep getting shocks about our system! Is the FCC Agency a moral police entity?! If Janet Jackson was hurt as a result of her nipple’s exposure, isn’t she the one who should be suing CBS?

Then what is big and abnormal about a nipple’s exposure in a culture where 5-years old have seen such things in magazines, the internet and possibly in person. This is also a culture where the lives of celebrities is legitimately pursued as part of the entertainment business, and there nothing more entertaining than seeing a nipple exposed during a Superbowl game!

In fact, I would consider this a piece of unique art where the camera can shift from the rough scene of players shoving each others to the delicate and romantic scene of a nipple’s exposure! This is indeed a unique shot for which CBS should receive an award, not be fined! 

If this would have happened in a country like Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan, then we would understand why a large number of people would be scandalized! But in America?! In fact, I am scandalized that a government agency is pursuing such frivolous affair after four years of its happening. Another indication that America is moving backwards when the whole world are trying to move forward!

The FCC ought to be replaced with an agency that is interested in stopping media consolidation and forget about Janet’s nipple! This is the most idiotic thing, ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A BREAST ???!!!  EEEEEEwwwww! 

If I see one it’ll probably hurt my heterosexual marriage and forever damn my heterosexual offspring into a heterosexual lifestyle.  Really?

Ask the censors in the Christian Far-Right where Jesus our Saviour, the Christ Child, the Lamb, would have been had he not been suckled at Mary’s breast? 

Now if we could censor bad taste for exploiting the breast at a sporting event, or advertising Viagra to shriveled, flaccid old men on the national airways, I’d be all for it.  “Ask your doctor if Cialis is right for you” ...

Could we punish prominent people for committing grammatical mayhem ... such as ... ” .. to my wife and I”” ...  or saying “new-ku-lar”.  Capital crimes, all. 

I’m an old curmudgeon who thinks breasts are beautiful and essential to the survival of all mankind.  Censor breasts and you deny our mammalian nature and the nurture of tiny children.

Grrrrr!  Grrrrrrrrr!  Double Grrrrrrrrrrrr!

I agree with purplewolf’s post at 4:52

What a waste of taxpayers money. Have these morons from the FCC never seen some of the documentaries from other countries that not only show women with bare breasts often sitting in public on the streets, some are breastfeeding also,(wow a bad thing right) children often run around totally nude in some countries and no one is making a circus out of it. America and its people have a childish attitude toward the human body and sex. It is time for these narrow people to grow up.

These same judgmental people should ask themselves if they believe in God and if everything that their God created is good? Well according to God, this is the way women were designed, so it could not be bad now could it? Get over it, or do these prudes suffer from breast envy?

I have seen members of the male gender who have much larger “breasts” than many women, who go without shirts in the hotter weather, yet I have not heard of anyone complaining about them. Some are downright gross. And many of these men have bigger ones than Janet Jackson.

Why not go after all these male enhancement ads on TV. I had the TV on the other night and every 5 minutes there was at least one of these ads on. Usually 2 ads per commercial break for these products. It went past the obsession point of being disgusting.

It is interesting that during the same Super Bowl as the infamous “wardrobe malfunction” there was an ad for one of the ED drugs that warned against a 4 hour erection!  Well, I think they should be sued for false advertising——mine only lasted for 2 hours!!!

FCC,
Just when in the hell are you going to break up the media monopoly held by conservative owners that are still controlling the information and minds of the american people? Make the media formats help and educate and not keep the elite from being seen.

Really? Seriously? Still?

This is just getting ridiculous. Who cares. First of all, it really was not the end of the world. Second of all, most people have forgotten about it now. Third, just forget about it already, this is just madness.

Waste of time, money and effort. Its over and done with, move on. Shouldn’t of even been a big deal from the beginning.

Meanwhile the networks hint at every sexual function known to man every night in every way they can. Jackson’s under fed breast was gross though and should be permanently banned from public veiwing….....

Publicity stunts can get costly.

And the Shrub’s appointees soldier on! What in the name of all that is normal and holy is the FCC fighting about? A total of nine-sixteenths of a second when Janet Jackson’s nipple was exposed.
Are these people for real? Do abnormal people sit on the board of the FCC?
This country has the moral attitude of Puritanical and prudish behaviour when it comes to the human body and of course, sexuality and sex.
Broadcasters are now self-censoring their programs, in an effort to avoid the wrath of the FCC, especially when it comes to the areas of LGBT thoughts and especially comedic series that show LGBT
lifestyles in an everyday normal light.
How in the world are people supposed to learn that there are other people than themselves who don’t hold to the values system, of 60 years ago, if not on the Television? Where will these puritanical, prudish people supposed to be exposed to different ideas? Most if not all, of the people I know who hold these beliefs are hiding their collective heads and asses in the sand, hoping that someone will come along and liberate the world from “indecency, immorality, spurious displays of sexuality, and other assorted and sordid things.
If people truly want to live that kind of lifestyle, hidden from the world in their own homes, then more power to them, just do not force that viewpoint on me, do not control my portion of the airwaves in an attempt to set your decency standards above the normal people in this country.